DNC rule restricting superdelegate power adopted - Feel the Bern 2020?

CHICAGO — The Democratic National Committeevoted Saturday to significantly curtail the power of superdelegates and make presidential caucuses more accessible, overcoming objections from a vocal minority of its membership.

The reform package, pushed by DNC Chairman Tom Perez and allies of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, among others, passed overwhelmingly by voice vote at the DNC’s summer meeting here — two years after the process started.

Perez and others hailed the outcome as momentous, saying the reforms will help welcome new people into the party by reassuring them that their vote will never be overruled by the party leaders who can vote for whomever they want for the presidential nomination.

“Today is a historic day for our party,” Perez said. “We passed major reforms that will not only put our next presidential nominee in the strongest position possible, but will help us elect Democrats up and down the ballot, across the country.”

The change will prohibit superdelegates from voting for president at the party’s 2020 convention, unless the outcome is already assured or it deadlocks, which hasn’t happened in decades. The vast majority of superdelegates sided with Hillary Clinton over Sanders in their primary fight two years ago.

"Today's decision by the DNC is an important step forward," Sanders said in a statement. "This has been a long and arduous process, and I want to thank Tom Perez and all of those who made it happen.”

The new rules will also make caucuses more accessible by requiring state parties to accept absentee votes, addressing concerns that the caucuses are less democratic than primaries because they require people to physically attend the events in order to participate in the presidential nominating process in their state.

A number of state parties are already considering replacing their caucuses with primaries, with some state party chairs here predicting the 2020 nominating contest will feature many fewer caucuses than in 2016.

The DNC can’t force states to change their rules but the reform package includes measures to encourage states to open their primaries and caucuses to independent voters, as well as to expand same-day voter registration in order to bring new voters.

Saturday’s vote was the conclusion of a lengthy process that began just before the 2016 Democratic National Convention, coming out of the animosity of that year's presidential primary.

Nearly every DNC member is a superdelegate, so some were not eager to give up their power.

Defenders of the status quo headed into the meeting knowing they were outnumbered, but determined to fight. However, after a procedural vote that went overwhelmingly in Perez’ favor, they saw the writing on the wall.

In a dramatic moment, Don Fowler, a former DNC chair who has been leading the resistance to the superdelegate change, stood to essentially concede and call for a swift approval of the changes by acclimation, rather than a full vote by paper ballots.

That was met with a standing ovation from delegates, many of whom were eyeing the clock as they hoped to catch flights later in the afternoon.

“I was skeptical of this proposal, but I’m a team player, and the most important thing we can do is elect Democrats this fall and in 2020,” said William Owens, a DNC member from Tennessee, choking back tears. “I’m trying to say this without crying.”

The debate was passionate and personal on both sides, provoking a hunger strike, invocations of the Bible and JFK, and some hurt feelings.


But in an interview with NBC News, Perez said he'd much rather have passion than apathy.

He compared the fight to a healthy "family" discussion, and said he was pleased the party ultimately decided to take a "leap of faith" to show that it trusts its grassroots and its voters.

In particular, he hoped young people, many of whom have been registering as independents instead of Democrats, will "look at what we did today and say, wow, the party is listening to me."

Some of the strongest opposition to the change came from black delegates, especially in the older generation, who said it would “disenfranchise” African-American and Latino party leaders and make their convention less diverse.

“Are you telling me that I’m going to go to a convention, after my 30 years of blood, sweat, and tears for this party, that you’re going to take away my right to appease a group of people?” said DNC Vice Chair Karen Carter Peterson, a black Louisiana State Senator, presumably referring to white Sanders supporters.


Proponents of the change dispute that charge, noting state parties will still include diversity requirements in their delegate selection rules, and that superdelegates can still endorse and advocate for candidates.

The changes are the most consequential reforms to the party’s nominating process since the 1980s, when it created superdelegates. Republican have no equivalent to superdelegates in their party.

Meanwhile in Chicago, the three finalist cities to host the 2020 Democratic National Convention tried to woo DNC members with food, drink and celebrity guests.

Miami’s host committee threw a party on a boat that included free flip flops and beach towels, Houston decked the halls of the Hyatt Regency with advertisements, and Milwaukee brought in basketball legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar to work a rope line as delegates munched on cheese curds and sipped the wares of the city's famous breweries.

Article: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna903866
 
I was skeptical of this proposal, but I’m a team player, and the most important thing we can do is elect Democrats this fall and in 2020,” said William Owens, a DNC member from Tennessee, choking back tears. “I’m trying to say this without crying.”

Srsly? :roll:

edit: My $ 0.02 on this, this will probably pull the Dems to harder lefty positions, given that the average primary voter is probably further to the left than the average general election voter. Doubly so in states with "closed" primaries.

As an example of what I mean, the 2006 CT Dem primary had Lieberman beaten by Ned Lamont. Lieberman went on to run as an Independent and squashed Lamont in the general. The average CT voter was quite happy with Lieberman as senator; the average CT voter willing/able to vote in primary elections was not.
 
Last edited:
They're changing the rules for the 2020 election right before the 2018 election. I'll believe them if they keep the rules change in 2020. Right now, it's just them coaxing dumb people into thinking they've changed.
I agree with you and @Duke Nukem it's a stunt.. but regardless where you sit in the realm of politics, I wonder if this will help or hindrance the DNC.

It looks dirty as hell to many people but the zealots are open to change rules to favor them (baffled and infuriated when cheating can go both ways) I think a lot of more sane left leaning people don't want to see this for what I said above, they want to win fair and square and fear what could happen when the boot shifts feet if moves like this happen.
 
Both the parties are the same anyway, it's all about whether or not the other guy insults his opposition and promises more rainbows for his constituents.

Democrats need to learn how to meme market if they want a chance.

Careful where you say that, some leftard fanboy/fangirl is gonna hear you and start screaming in your ear about how "my party is better how dare you compare me to Republicans YOU RACIST"
 
I'll be impressed if the dems actually make a move to get rid of the bullshit early caucuses and primaries and actually try to push for a single national primary, rotating regional primaries, or something other than the current bullshit where two tiny rural states get hugely disproportionate influence into the electoral process. I think that moving to a much better/fairer primary schedule is something both parties could agree on. It would be a smart tactical move for the Republicans too, since successful candidates would be less likely to be the kind of person who's good at buttering up to elderly farmers.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lysol and MidUSA
I know what this means:

c6c.jpg
 
This is a hoax. It only prevents them from voting on the first ballot. Normally during the first ballot there is a large field of players and nobody gets a majority.

In such a case the DNC's claimed superdelegates have been stripped of power is absolutely meaningless. There is a really good chance that they have included a new provision about how they're going to have more than one ballot so they can work things out and think things through required. It will be something about not rushing to judgment on just one ballot.
 
Last edited:
Back