Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still found hilarious that they actually believe the Muslim ban and the enforcement of immigration law is something so apocaliptic that they need to screech about it, unless they want to be cultural enriched like Europe

They do believe that its apocalyptic, but they don't know the real reason they are screeching. They've been fed the media narrative that looks good on the surface, make them feel better about themselves, help the poor refugees etc etc. But who is feeding the media that story?

People in power who see immigrants and dropping of border controls towards having not only a captive voting bloc (uneducated immigrants would easily fall for party propaganda), but also as a good way to flood the market with more potential labor force, driving down wages ad-infinitum. So it benefits both politicians and corporations.

Sure you could try and do what Trump does and keep borders closed, work on innovation, education, trade tariffs to try and force manufacturing to return. But that doesn't guarantee your party permanency in office, nor does it give corporations and easy way to boost growth predictions for their shareholders. They want big profits NOW. Like the 2008 crisis.
 
Sure you could try and do what Trump does and keep borders closed, work on innovation, education, trade tariffs to try and force manufacturing to return. But that doesn't guarantee your party permanency in office, nor does it give corporations and easy way to boost growth predictions for their shareholders. They want big profits NOW. Like the 2008 crisis.
The sad thing is they'd get bigger and more stable profits over the long term if that didn't happen. Publicly traded companies were a mistake.
 
The sad thing is they'd get bigger and more stable profits over the long term if that didn't happen. Publicly traded companies were a mistake.

Yes but CEOs want their big bonuses and the way they get their bonuses is from huge short term returns. So they do whatever it takes to do it. Even if it turns into some corrupt sideshow like the housing loan crisis. Doesn't bother them, they got the bonuses, the shareholders were happy, and they are on vacation in Switzerland.

In the long term I think the idea is to resemble China economically. Have so many people immigrating in, that human labor is worth almost nothing, while the population is so poor and uneducated, that you can manipulate their public opinion easily. And I think Sweden and Germany are the test cases in switching to globalization you want to look at right now.
 
fb55fe497404732367253fcc2e754341.png

8013055c4b8a37cee315b3cc53a50aec.png
50fb67af60cf0623ad5303629d35acb8.jpg
0f940bdd1f1f563f04d90b617c3d40ad.png
a71eb5f1756a898b2a28d235cb39e65d.png
ebc0f6546be07dd81b8c0816717145dd.png
95c2b7abd421fcee8ecbd09a9cfdf3ee.png
3e1eb2987a91f5f023559305b8e43be8.png
204bc21a68cfcdc3bd4a68db32df6f74.png
a69fbbffe9f7e17b7d9c1fd022c0eb6b.png
8e00781cfae6c1f4fd8d034068a69559.png
8b5ce89dc59d97613cbc6ad7517527b8.png
02485000a0a29e82e212a531668a2ad0.png
dfec0ebf0715a3a3c597af221bbee964.png
148b9b4a38c77b417e71a54b2cf52ff7.png
13529fdf669b6d4f7d8a9dcee8724a9c.png
ac82d66f903bda21b7476ab742131e9b.png
3441dd8663f9995a22ea0099a063fe57.png

So were they just incapable of finding even a single protestor that didn't look like they came from some meth-granola hippie camp in California? I've rummaged through a decent chunk of all the protestors who stood up to start screaming and every single one of them looks exactly like you'd expect them to look. That woman in the lime-green shirt read Harry Potter so many times that she became a Harry Potter character, for fuck's sake.

Black guy looks like the dude from "Get Out."

Aside from the bad optics of interrupting dozens upon dozens of times in one sitting, these people continue to look like the caricatures the right paints them as. You gotta love it when your opposition takes no time to at least pretend to look respectable, or find paid protestors who don't look like (as you said) hippies from some commune in California.
 
31d3ba478956ca8cf4cb9e930628c00a.png

... Any particular reason that you wrote that one out in Spanish, guys?

>Ilegal and inmigrant
>Employed
>Having Worker's Rights

Man, they sure want to die on that hill, huh? Is not like corporations and business would use that to do some laundering, no sir.

Red wave incoming.
 
The thing is that Roe vs. Wade being repealed doesn't matter. What matters is abortion rights have been easily chipped away for years and years in the midwest and the south, places where white, East-Coast Democrats don't care about. They make laws where they define the exact dimensions of abortion clinics and shit, forcing them to go out of business. Conservatives have long since figured out the way to stop abortion was simply to regulate the ever-living fuck out of it on the state level.

The Supreme Court is the last place you'd go to fight for abortion. Its right there in the states and local governments.
Yeah, but they can't. The Dems have spent so much time focusing on federal, they've lost huge chunks of state and local governments. What was it, like 1000 state legislature seats have shifted to the GOP from the Dems? 33 States with GOP governors, and 25 of those with GOP governor + majority GOP state legislatures? If they keep losing on the state level, they could wind up 'owning' D.C. and having nothing to show for it.
 
It’s funny and sad how liberals/leftists keep embarrassing themselves. Kavanaugh is pretty much already confirmed and this hearing is just a circus. There is nothing dems can do to stop it or delay at this point unless two republicans flip which is unlikely.

So painting the guy as being an ultra-righting judge does what? Look at Clarence Thomas, he wasn’t impeached. The liberal jerkoff fantasy of impeaching Kavanaugh is childish and naive and not winning over moderates. The base is already “energized” and still won’t show up to vote in November. I know I’m not planning to vote.

Man, just spend 5 minutes reflecting on what got you into this situation (identity politics).
 
I hope it's literally nothing and Booker gets tossed at the same time.

Two birds one stone and all that.

https://www.scribd.com/document/387988906/Booker-Confidential-Kavanaugh-Hearing
Here's the documents, four pages of a email conversation in regards to racial profiling after 9/11. From what I've skimmed through it indeed looks like literally nothing. It looks like he's giving advice to colleagues on how to go about finding terrorists in a quick and effective manner without resorting to race or national origin. At one point he even says in the emails that he wants a system that does not resort to racial and national profiling. He admits it's hard and that, until a effective system is formed, they have to grapple with ways to make things work until then without dipping into the race/nation profiling stuff.

email said:
The people who favor some use of race/natl origin obviously do not need to grapple with the interim question. But the people (such as you and I) who generally favor effective security measures that are race-neutral in fact DO need to grapple --and grapple now -- with the interim question of what to do before a truly effective and comprehensive race-neutral system is developed and implemented.
 
I for one find it telling that they can't disqualify this man on his qualification for office or any legal/political skeletons, and instead are trying to create this circus.

From where I'm sitting, Kavanaugh seems to be a bit of strict constructionalist but is otherwise pretty vanilla, we've had worse.
 
Yeah, but they can't. The Dems have spent so much time focusing on federal, they've lost huge chunks of state and local governments. What was it, like 1000 state legislature seats have shifted to the GOP from the Dems? 33 States with GOP governors, and 25 of those with GOP governor + majority GOP state legislatures? If they keep losing on the state level, they could wind up 'owning' D.C. and having nothing to show for it.

The Dems did nothing to reverse Nixon's Southern Strategy, and now they are doing nothing in regards to Trump sipping away their core blue-collar base for the past three years. Their woes are strictly self-inflicted, and it's only going to get worse as more and more establishment Dems are getting flushed out by hipster low-functioning sociopaths and mystery meats. So much for their "fuck drumpf and fuck whitey" dogma.

Anyway, back on topic.

https://twitter.com/jason_donner/status/1037695051542024192

TldUCvT.png
 
The Dems did nothing to reverse Nixon's Southern Strategy, and now they are doing nothing in regards to Trump sipping away their core blue-collar base for the past three years. Their woes are strictly self-inflicted, and it's only going to get worse as more and more establishment Dems are getting flushed out by hipster low-functioning sociopaths and mystery meats. So much for their "fuck drumpf and fuck whitey" dogma.

Anyway, back on topic.

https://twitter.com/jason_donner/status/1037695051542024192

TldUCvT.png
Never thought I'd see the day when I'd be cheering for Grassley. I've always viewed the guy as a grandstanding asshole.

Oh well. The enemy of my enemy is a problem for later, but in the meantime, he might be useful.
 
Back