Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
c1bf6e99094e9b5d7f5bd8b36fa39a4b.png

Apparently the e-mails Booker was talking about weren't even confidential, so if he got his ass hurled out of the Senate he'd have done it for absolutely no reason. Not that I believe even he thought he was in any danger of that happening, he just wanted to grand-stand for his 2020 run.
 
Last edited:
c1bf6e99094e9b5d7f5bd8b36fa39a4b.png

Apparently the e-mails Booker was talking about weren't even confidential, so if he gets his ass hurled out of the Senate he'll have done it for absolutely no reason.

It takes 2/3's of the senate to kick out a member. He won't be removed, that's why he went ahead with it and colleagues backed him because they know they're safe unless the Senate suddenly adds 11 or 12 more Republicans.
 
These people can't see how they are strengthening the hated Drumpf and his Republicans. It's working so well that it's surprising that they haven't started accusing each other of being Russian sleeper agents. I think they may reach that state in the post-midterm collective nervous breakdown.
 
https://www.scribd.com/document/387988906/Booker-Confidential-Kavanaugh-Hearing
Here's the documents, four pages of a email conversation in regards to racial profiling after 9/11. From what I've skimmed through it indeed looks like literally nothing. It looks like he's giving advice to colleagues on how to go about finding terrorists in a quick and effective manner without resorting to race or national origin. At one point he even says in the emails that he wants a system that does not resort to racial and national profiling. He admits it's hard and that, until a effective system is formed, they have to grapple with ways to make things work until then without dipping into the race/nation profiling stuff.
So how quickly will this be spun into "muh RACISM" by the media, because "racial and national profiling"?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Fool
I'm not sure people understand what repealing Roe v. Wade would do. I think they think it just makes abortions illegal immediately. No Democrats are interested in correcting this misconception because it riles people up.

I got tired of this during Obama when every year or so friends would circulate hysterical warnings about some bill that was supposedly going to cripple Planned Parenthood, so please give money and sign the petition now. Obviously none of them would do anything, because they could not make it past the House/Senate/Obama.
Planned Parenthood spends a bunch of money on troon causes. Why? What do troons have to do with pregnancy? If they're so worried about losing funding why are they throwing money at random trannies?

No one really gets that Roe vs. Wade has been a boon to Republicans and they'd never repeal it because it risks a stronger and more stringent law gets put into place so they can't piecemeal destroy abortion like they can now if they wanted.

Not to mention Kavanugh has explicitly stated he is not interested in overturning Roe vs. Wade.

Why is this guy bringing out all the crazies? Gorsuch is a conservative judge and I don't remember a circus at his hearings.

Dem organizations are paying and busing them in. They're still very angry about being prevented from having their pick when Scalia died and they have no qualms about using this to drum up support for midterms. By the by, if RBG dies, its going to be 1000x worse. I wouldn't put it past them to bus Antifa in and let them loose in the hearings if that happens.
 
It's close to the midterms. They have to motivate their base of hysterical morons. And this is their best strategy.

One would expect Dems to, at the very least, capitalize on the cuckservatard #NeverTrump apathy, or rehash the same Blue Dog strategy that worked in the 2006 midterms, and they've done neither.
 
fb55fe497404732367253fcc2e754341.png

8013055c4b8a37cee315b3cc53a50aec.png
50fb67af60cf0623ad5303629d35acb8.jpg
0f940bdd1f1f563f04d90b617c3d40ad.png
a71eb5f1756a898b2a28d235cb39e65d.png
ebc0f6546be07dd81b8c0816717145dd.png
95c2b7abd421fcee8ecbd09a9cfdf3ee.png
3e1eb2987a91f5f023559305b8e43be8.png
204bc21a68cfcdc3bd4a68db32df6f74.png
a69fbbffe9f7e17b7d9c1fd022c0eb6b.png
8e00781cfae6c1f4fd8d034068a69559.png
8b5ce89dc59d97613cbc6ad7517527b8.png
02485000a0a29e82e212a531668a2ad0.png
dfec0ebf0715a3a3c597af221bbee964.png
148b9b4a38c77b417e71a54b2cf52ff7.png
13529fdf669b6d4f7d8a9dcee8724a9c.png
ac82d66f903bda21b7476ab742131e9b.png
3441dd8663f9995a22ea0099a063fe57.png

So were they just incapable of finding even a single protestor that didn't look like they came from some meth-granola hippie camp in California? I've rummaged through a decent chunk of all the protestors who stood up to start screaming and every single one of them looks exactly like you'd expect them to look. That woman in the lime-green shirt read Harry Potter so many times that she became a Harry Potter character, for fuck's sake.

Remember kids, these folks are on the right side of history.
 
You know it's bad when i can say even Castro's son is less of a shitshow than the Democrats and mean it without any irony despite making my opinion on him clear

fb55fe497404732367253fcc2e754341.png

8013055c4b8a37cee315b3cc53a50aec.png
50fb67af60cf0623ad5303629d35acb8.jpg
0f940bdd1f1f563f04d90b617c3d40ad.png
a71eb5f1756a898b2a28d235cb39e65d.png
ebc0f6546be07dd81b8c0816717145dd.png
95c2b7abd421fcee8ecbd09a9cfdf3ee.png
3e1eb2987a91f5f023559305b8e43be8.png
204bc21a68cfcdc3bd4a68db32df6f74.png
a69fbbffe9f7e17b7d9c1fd022c0eb6b.png
8e00781cfae6c1f4fd8d034068a69559.png
8b5ce89dc59d97613cbc6ad7517527b8.png
02485000a0a29e82e212a531668a2ad0.png
dfec0ebf0715a3a3c597af221bbee964.png
148b9b4a38c77b417e71a54b2cf52ff7.png
13529fdf669b6d4f7d8a9dcee8724a9c.png
ac82d66f903bda21b7476ab742131e9b.png
3441dd8663f9995a22ea0099a063fe57.png

So were they just incapable of finding even a single protestor that didn't look like they came from some meth-granola hippie camp in California? I've rummaged through a decent chunk of all the protestors who stood up to start screaming and every single one of them looks exactly like you'd expect them to look. That woman in the lime-green shirt read Harry Potter so many times that she became a Harry Potter character, for fuck's sake.
I don't understand, why do you mean she became a Harry Potter character? Democrats are messing my brain and i'm so confused
 
dbe8fb041e547494bf81f91a73caa1aa.png

Because it was stupid request, why the fuck would he do that? Also what the Hell is wrong with his hands? Does this dude have Parkinson's or something?
Seriously why the fuck would he? That makes absolutely no sense. Telling a judge of the supreme fucking court to not do his job? What in the fucking shit? These dems are starting to make me mad on the internet
 
Because it was stupid request ?


You stand to represent the highest court in the land, of last resort, above which there would be no other. So, you'd naturally recuse yourself from ruling on a case involving the highest level of the executive branch, above which there is no other office? Right?

Darn straight it's stupid.
 
c1bf6e99094e9b5d7f5bd8b36fa39a4b.png

Apparently the e-mails Booker was talking about weren't even confidential, so if he got his ass hurled out of the Senate he'd have done it for absolutely no reason. Not that I believe even he thought he was in any danger of that happening, he just wanted to grand-stand for his 2020 run.
I’m sure this got a ton of upvotes and made the front page of reddit like all the other topics jerking off Booker for breaking the rules and releasing “classified” emails.

Fuck the democrats.
 
Back