Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Booker goes on full dindu nuffin and blames the evil Rethugglickkkans for the fact his attention whoring stunt blew in his face.


https://www.dailywire.com/news/35571/watch-cnn-msnbc-go-after-cory-booker-lying-booker-ryan-saavedra

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) received intense scrutiny from CNN and MSNBC on Thursday after he was caught in an apparent lie earlier in the day about documents he released that were connected to Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

Booker, in a show of political theatrics, claimed that he was breaking Senate rules by releasing “confidential” Kavanaugh emails.

Not only did the move completely backfire as the documents showed that Kavanaugh opposed racial profiling and racial bias, officials revealed that they had cleared the emails for Booker to release at his request and that they gave him the green light to release them.
 
At one point he even says in the emails that he wants a system that does not resort to racial and national profiling. He admits it's hard and that, until a effective system is formed, they have to grapple with ways to make things work until then without dipping into the race/nation profiling stuff.

Holy shit. This has got to be one of the funniest self-owns I've seen in a while.

"This guy can't be a judge. He's racist! He believes in racial profiling!"
*releases documents showing guy doesn't favor racial profiling*
"Don't forget to vote Booker 2020!"
 
I love how the left can only ever compare things to fantasy TV and stories.

History can't be that hard to draw comparisons from.
History unfortunately shows most of their ideas have already been tried and failed numerous times. It also shows some of the scams politicians have pulled on people, and they don't want that.

On the other hand, fantasy stories have weird unconventional forms of government work just fine, and lots of the the history itself is subject to change, because it's all made up anyway!
 
Holy shit. This has got to be one of the funniest self-owns I've seen in a while.

"This guy can't be a judge. He's racist! He believes in racial profiling!"
*releases documents showing guy doesn't favor racial profiling*
"Don't forget to vote Booker 2020!"

To be fair, leftists and democrats don't read anything besides titles and gossip. It was an admirable bluff.
 
Wow. Even the grabassiest of the assgrabbers aren't taking this lying down. Somebody better stick a fork in this nigga, cuz he done as shit.
Unfortunately, no, he isn’t done, Jersey is one of those states where politics is dominated by a single urban area, in this case Newark. Senator Booker here is the former mayor of Newark. He will be reelected forever until he dies or gets beat in a primary by another Democrat.
I also think that it’s a shame that this clown is still the less offensive Senator my state has. Bob Menedez has been involved in a corruption trial for like the last 5 years that shows no signs of being resolved, and HE keeps being reelected no matter what. Booker being a drooling tard isn’t that bad in the grand scheme of NJ politics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow who would have thought that Booker would end up being as crooked as the guy he ran against all those years ago in the mayor of Newark election they even made a documentary about it called Street Fight. Sharpe James used the same Soros tactics by bussing in people from Philly and giving them shirts and signs to wear outside the polling stations.
 
orchestrated_sedition_cartoon.jpg


https://grrrgraphics.com/the-democrats-orchestrated-sedition/
 
Unfortunately, no, he isn’t done, Jersey is one of those states where politics is dominated by a single urban area, in this case Newark. Senator Booker here is the former mayor of Newark. He will be reelected forever until he dies or gets beat in a primary by another Democrat.

I also think that it’s a shame that this clown is still the less offensive Senator my state has. Bob Menedez has been involved in a corruption trial for like the last 5 years that shows no signs of being resolved, and HE keeps being reelected no matter what. Booker being a drooling tard isn’t that bad in the grand scheme of NJ politics.

Booker is known mainly for parading around a composite, imaginary character (T-bone) he made up in an attempt to gaslight his constituents and colleagues whenever he finds it convenient. It goes without saying he never actually lived in Newark whilst he served as mayor.

I don't recall much about Bob Menendez, other than that he is a pedofork and that the media went to extreme lengths to swipe it under the rug the last time he ran for re-election in '12.
 
ae5238fb5f7dec1c800a6d25054af30a.png

Oh for Christ's sake are we seriously going to dig back to this dude's high school years and find some completely-anonymous source to try and whip together another off-the-cuff "sexual scandal" just to try and avoid nominating him? I'm so fucking tired of this playbook.
 
ae5238fb5f7dec1c800a6d25054af30a.png

Oh for Christ's sake are we seriously going to dig back to this dude's high school years and find some completely-anonymous source to try and whip together another off-the-cuff "sexual scandal" just to try and avoid nominating him? I'm so fucking tired of this playbook.

Well weaponizing #MeToo got Judge Persky yanked off the bench after the Turner case and they didn't even accuse Persky of misconduct, sexual or otherwise. So why wouldn't #MeToo be used as a club here for political purposes?
 
ae5238fb5f7dec1c800a6d25054af30a.png

Oh for Christ's sake are we seriously going to dig back to this dude's high school years and find some completely-anonymous source to try and whip together another off-the-cuff "sexual scandal" just to try and avoid nominating him? I'm so fucking tired of this playbook.

The woman has retained an attorney but doesn't want to press this further? Is this just her trying to get an attorney before being sued for defamation?
 
Back