Daddies and Littles - Child Abuse Fetish

That guy isn't even a guy, they're a genderspecial... so, sad, insecure natal woman with a ton of daddy issues, just like 90% of all the other 'littles' this thread has unearthed. Her blog is a fucking trip, too: 50% standard Tumblr bullshit about cats and self-esteem and #woke superhero OCs; 50% diapers and, apparently, self-induced incontinence.

Screenshot_20180916-133555_Chrome.jpg


Screenshot_20180916-133315_Chrome.jpg
 
That guy isn't even a guy, they're a genderspecial... so, sad, insecure natal woman with a ton of daddy issues, just like 90% of all the other 'littles' this thread has unearthed. Her blog is a fucking trip, too: 50% standard Tumblr bullshit about cats and self-esteem and #woke superhero OCs; 50% diapers and, apparently, self-induced incontinence.

View attachment 542296

View attachment 542295

Why do they always choose colour combinations for text that assault the eyes?

If anyone actually wants to read that, I've inverted the colors, so while the colors are still horrid, it's now legible.
It's not anything special, so I don't see why anyone would want to read it.
Screenshot_20180916-133555_Chrome.jpg
 
Anyone run across an underage daddies? I recall seeing them (or at least ones who claimed to be underage) on those dd/lg matchmaking blogs that have all gotten suspended by now, but are any of them still around? and legit?

Also it makes me sad that I can't call stuffed animals "stuffies" anymore because of these freaks... I always found it a completely normal term....
 
Anyone run across an underage daddies? I recall seeing them (or at least ones who claimed to be underage) on those dd/lg matchmaking blogs that have all gotten suspended by now, but are any of them still around? and legit?

Also it makes me sad that I can't call stuffed animals "stuffies" anymore because of these freaks... I always found it a completely normal term....
I don’t know of any specific ones post new community standards, but I do know the group you’re speaking of. There used to be a collective of blogs that claimed they were a “minors only, sfw dd/lg matchmaking service for daddies and littles”. Not sure how a fetish is “sfw” or acceptable for minors! Anyway, most underage daddies would pair up with even more underage girls, some of them being as young as 13 (youngest age permitted on tumblr- though one could lie). A daddy wouldn’t pair up with an older little (to my knowledge), because that’d just be a mommy and male little, which is basically the same gross coin’s other side.
 
Secondary question: if the little is as young as 13 (or 12.9 as the age fakers on tumblr all claim), what's the point of regressing to childhood. They're already kids. They're literally just going back, like, three years and that's sexy somehow??

eta: How often do "underage" daddies get caught lying about their age to get ahold of even more underage littles through the matchmaker? or are the mods not completely idiots
 
Tumblr dd/lg communities are a predator's dream.

The idea of an "underage little" is something made up and promoted by pedophiles. A 13 year old is going to like things appropriate to a 13 year old, big surprise. And then a pedo comes along and grooms them to believe it's because they're a "little" and need a "daddy" when actually the kid is just acting like a kid.

"Underage daddies" are rare because this is a fetish for post-college beta cucks who have been rejected and scorned by women all their life and desperately want to have complete control over a female. Control is their fetish because deep down they know it's their only shot.

Dd/lg tumblr claims to be against pedophilia, but they can't seem to understand that pedos and predators can be nice to people who aren't their victims. It's the same thing happening in the furry fandom with the zoophilia thing. "Oh my friend can't possibly be a rapist" wrong dumbshit.
 
(:powerlevel:) Years ago I was invited (but declined) to do a comic for Erika Moen. The only topics she won't allow anyone to cover are scat and rape fetishes, with some nonsense about not kinkshaming anyone. I think she has an aversion to anything unsanitary (except piss I guess).

So of course she did a Pedo Fetish comic without diapers. Acknowledging these people shit themselves would not be OJST material.
 
(:powerlevel:) Years ago I was invited (but declined) to do a comic for Erika Moen. The only topics she won't allow anyone to cover are scat and rape fetishes, with some nonsense about not kinkshaming anyone. I think she has an aversion to anything unsanitary (except piss I guess).

So of course she did a Pedo Fetish comic without diapers. Acknowledging these people shit themselves would not be OJST material.
Poop and Rape are bad, but Piss and simulated kiddie porn is okay?
:thinking:
Also what... kink? Did Erika Moen initiate contact with you over?
 
(:powerlevel:) Years ago I was invited (but declined) to do a comic for Erika Moen. The only topics she won't allow anyone to cover are scat and rape fetishes, with some nonsense about not kinkshaming anyone. I think she has an aversion to anything unsanitary (except piss I guess).

So of course she did a Pedo Fetish comic without diapers. Acknowledging these people shit themselves would not be OJST material.

I can see why she'd avoid rape fetishes, as they conflict with her conception of reality that no person ever fantasizes about that ever and nothing bad ever happens. But I still see it as "chickening out" as many survivors actually use rape kinks to cope. Add whatever "trigger warnings" and what not and most people should be ok if they don't want to see it. As an editor your job is to give the people what they want and as an educator what is good for them, as opposed to what you want.
 
Back