- Joined
- Sep 21, 2018
I agree! I don't know why I'm still the messanger here, I Belive glowfox is ligit. he is willing to answer your questions and try and prove he is but will he be able to walk here now without getting destoryed? I mean I was only meant to be a white flag, it got me doxed and outed when I was just trying to help... but I've reached my limit and I've gave you all the evidence I personally have I'm going to ask Glowfox to join here, please be fair with him...
Coast.
Here is my current analysis of the situation based on the statements and evidence provided.
I am convinced, based on provided evidence, that the chatlogs between Glowfox and SnakeThing are 100% legitimate, and were not fabricated. I can elaborate further if you would like me to show evidence validating the logs.
Based on the chatlogs, and the media shared between Glowfox and SnakeThing, I am convinced that Glowfox and his boyfriend are both zoophiles.
That being said, however, there is nothing to suggest, at the time of writing, that Glowfox is a zoosadist. No zoosadist content was shared between them. Some here may consider what Glowfox did to be zoosadism, but I don't think it compares to the allegations leveled against Kero, or other people in the zoosadist archive.
"Innocent until proven guilty" applies here. There is no indication that Glowfox shared zoosadist content, or engaged in any zoosadist activity. At the time of writing, I am willing to say that Glowfox is innocent of these particular allegations.
The allegations of pedophilia are still up in the air, and I will not make any assumptions at the present time, based on the gravity of the accusation.
If you would like me to post evidence that supports my assumptions, ask and I will do so.
Summary:
* The chat logs are legitimate.
* Glowfox is a Zoophile.
* Glowfox is NOT a Zoosadist.
* I cannot make any assumptions regarding the pedophilia claim.