Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still think they might try to pin a crime on him.
Grabbing a boob in 1982 is well past the statute of limitations. I don't think that grabbing boobs is a federal crime anyways. Which is why they balked when asked before.

I guess it could be a special investigator witch hunt kinda dealie. Looking for perjury and other irregularities. But that could lead to all sorts of problems for dems considering the muddled way that this whole thing came about with Ford and her "leaks". I don't think they want too many people looking too closely at that.

It's Piss Dossier part II if they did.
 
How could anyone listen to Kavanaugh's testimony today and say that he's finished?

It was a clearly desperate man trying to hold his life together and face accusations that essentially ruined him and at this point, he probably doesn't care that he joins the SCOTUS, he just wants to prove himself innocent.

"They why not have the FBI investigate?"

Because what is the FBI going to do?

"Well, three people say he did it, three people say he wasn't there, and two said they were the one to fondle the ditzy blonde after she had too much to drink."

Because this is the JOB of the fucking Judiciary Committee.

Because they say on it for 6 weeks.

I was hoping that Grassley's balls would drop and he'd say: Well, we heard both sides, we all asked questions. Vote's tomorrow.

Or call for it then and there.

The man had his name dragged through the mud and any defense he can give is spun by the left as more evidence as him being guilty.

We had a genuine display of masculine stoicness and emotion and you know every late night hack is going to make fun of it for him.

How can anyone see and/or hear this and say: Well, Kavanaugh got owned by the Dems, lol.

That wasn't the hearing I heard.
 
05515FF5-5C31-465D-A150-E55C944FACD2.jpg
 
I can see the stalling tactic theory, but considering the FBI already has a healthy amount of #REEEEEEEsisters in it I still think they might try to pin a crime on him. They already dragged the man through the mud, so why not lock up the wrongthinker? That'll show Drumphff for not losing the election like a good boy.

You need a Federal crime to do that.... Kavanaugh, no matter what he did 30 years ago, didn't do it across state lines, so they have no jurisdiction, they have no alleged Federal violations against him, and if they suddenly did, that would look suspicious as hell considering they've already background checked him as he rose through the judiciary. As much as a couple never-Trumper agents may want to do that, it simply can't happen because this isn't a Banana Republic, you still have to have some actual evidence.
 
You could not write a scenario in which the Democrats come off more like unrepentant assholes. Throughout the hearings up to this point, Kavanaugh came off like an incredibly stable and reasonable moderate whose sole goal in life was to interpret the constitution as the founding fathers would have wanted it.

He had already taken more questions than every other confirmation hearing ever, combined, and he calmly corrected senators and gave his views on important issues the entire time. Then, they start throwing personal, and quite severe, accusations at him with no tangible evidence, and the media reports on it like it's a given that he's a monster. It all comes to a head, and he shows some emotion after having his reputation attacked for weeks, his future legacy surely stained by all this, and his family being roped into all of this too. The immediate reaction across the aisle is to say that his anger over all this is because he's been caught, despite the complete lack of evidence.

I know it's pointless to get mad over shit like this, but Jesus Christ, the Democrats on that panel sure do make it hard not to hate them.
 
Well this has been a spectacular own goal by the democrats. They essentially tried to smear atticus finch as Jack the ripper and now that that has failed miserably they are going with the overly emotional and far right conspiracy nut job line.

Never mind they put him in a position that would tax anyone's emotions and that the whole left wing conspiracy angle was transparently obvious to anyone.
 
Back