Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Holy cow, did they seriously lose Colbert? Damn, first Maher and now him?

Yo dems!

Due to how much the audience is cheering... I'm gonna say he is (totally fucking ironically) talking about something else entirely.

There's also this.
bert.png
 
Due to how much the audience is cheering... I'm gonna say he is (totally fucking ironically) talking about something else entirely.

There's also this.
View attachment 552826

They probably could have won public sympathy by focusing on his corporate shilling. Now people will support Kavanaught just to spite the hysterical moral busybodies of MeToo that don't concern themselves with evidence.

Everybody sees these people and gets exhausted and exasperated by them.
 

I find it interesting that everyone is on the listen and believe bandwagon for this obviously lying Dana Carvey impersonator, yet when dealing with any that have come before - Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathy Shelton well, I think this is the best way to sum up the left's opinion about believing "Rape" survivors, when they aren't politically aligned to them ;

I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing. I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way. - Hillary Clinton on 12 year old rape victim, Kathy Shelton

Seems like this could also apply to Ford.
 
View attachment 552801
Looks like the GOP grew a spine and won't delay further

About goddamned time.
Remember the good ol' days when actual fist fights broke out on the floor of congress and reps would pull their pistols on each other?

God, if this had been like then, I'm sure 1860s Kavanaugh would have shot some of them.
No I imagine it'd be sort of like the end of Super Troopers where he downs the one good bottle of whiskey he saves for special occasions, then has bare knuckle fisticuffs with them. That or he just grabs the nearest metal camera stand from the reporters and has an Anchorman brawl.

At one of the very first meetings of Congress, two congressmen had a hardcore wrestling match over some stupid dispute and it involved chairs and fireplace pokers.

If Kavanaugh wanted to channel their spirit and do that to some of the pricks he had to deal with, I'd probably toss him a steel chair.
You know there's enough furniture in those Senate chambers for impromptu Tables, Ladders and Chairs matches. Just ask the janitors for the ladders, I'm sure they'd oblige.
 
He had already taken more questions than every other confirmation hearing ever, combined, and he calmly corrected senators and gave his views on important issues the entire time.
Correction: He sort of lost his cool once. He got visibly pissed when Blumenthal started to talk shit about Renate Dolphin and cut-off and corrected him. Which was a-ok with me and pretty much everyone else.
 
They probably could have won public sympathy by focusing on his corporate shilling. Now people will support Kavanaught just to spite the hysterical moral busybodies of MeToo that don't concern themselves with evidence.

Everybody sees these people and gets exhausted and exasperated by them.
Kavanaugh's spectacular showing aside, Ford's display today was not a good one. Between visibly trying (and failing) multiple times to fake cry, needing nearly an extra hour of coaching, (and STILL needing to have her lawyers yank away her mic every 2 seconds to keep her from saying something stupid), and utterly failing to explain why every single person she named as a witness to the alleged crime denies it, I am wondering how the hell *anyone* believes this bitch.

I hope she sees prison for this.
 

Because you brought it up, quoting myself from an earlier post about the same thing:
I'd like to take a moment that if you're an American and want to try and have a 0.5% chance of possibly having your voice heard on the matter (hey, a chance is a chance) then here is the contact page for the Chair of the Senate Judiciary and Republican members of the committee excluding Jeff Flake (because he's a flake). Note that despite being from different states Senators (or at least their aids) will read emails from people out of state since Senate matters tend to affect the entire U.S.:

 
Back