Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At this point I'm long past the point of caring about politics and whether or not Brett gets into the SC, both sides (but mostly Dems due to their tiring "go woke" bullshit that refuses to slump into the "go broke" phase for some unexplainable reason) are filled with idiots that are better off in a sped class.

Call me when actual civil war were declared and people are getting their heads blown off in public by snipers, not the armchair/internet "civil war" bullshit that keeps the largely docile population safe and coddled like a fucking toddler that regularly shits itself when things don't go their way.
 
What would happen if Kavanaugh is confirmed? In terms of how the public would react.
Apparently sexual assault will be legalized and there will be a mass tranny suicide as they will obviously be the ones raped the hardest.

Really, the world will go on. Both sides will use their own takes to galvanize their respective bases for the midterms and the endless political campaign cycle will continue.
 
After all that's happened, if I were Kavanaugh after getting voted in and the Dems came to me for anything down the line and ask me to see whatever proposal at their point of view, I'd straight up tell them to go kill themselves

Congratulations DNC, every single bit of an iota to make any sort of compromise or negotiation with you has been thrown out the goddamn window and it's all thanks to you
 
both sides (but mostly Dems due to their tiring "go woke" bullshit that refuses to slump into the "go broke" phase for some unexplainable reason) are filled with idiots that are better off in a sped class.
Both sides are filled with idiots but centrists and people who say "both sides are idiots" to make themselves feel/look smart are dumber
 
At this point I'm long past the point of caring about politics and whether or not Brett gets into the SC, both sides (but mostly Dems due to their tiring "go woke" bullshit that refuses to slump into the "go broke" phase for some unexplainable reason) are filled with idiots that are better off in a sped class.
one of the more unpleasant things about this theatre is how bad the acting is. it's like there's a minimum level of transparent dishonesty required to speak at these hearings. i find what the democrats are doing distasteful and lean right, but i can't make sense of why anyone found graham's grandstanding yesterday impressive. is it because he seemed less limp-wristed than usual? that's not saying much. and while i'm sympathetic to kavanaugh, i don't believe it's lost on anyone that he's bullshitting at least a little, and almost certainly isn't as squeaky clean as he claimed to be. everyone -- even kavanaugh himself -- pretending otherwise to cover their asses or stick to the party line chips away at my patience tbh

speaking of graham, did anyone else hear him describe himself today not as a "straight white male," but as a "single white male?" :story:
 
i don't believe it's lost on anyone that he's bullshitting at least a little, and almost certainly isn't as squeaky clean as he claimed to be.

Shit like this is why people make false accusations, she is literally the only person saying this party happened and that it was 100% him but can't remember how she got there, whose house it was or how she got home (which was a good few miles away so it's unlikely she forgot walking that far) but morons like you still think he must have done something for no other reason than you hearing his name.
 
one of the more unpleasant things about this theatre is how bad the acting is. it's like there's a minimum level of transparent dishonesty required to speak at these hearings. i find what the democrats are doing distasteful and lean right, but i can't make sense of why anyone found graham's grandstanding yesterday impressive. is it because he seemed less limp-wristed than usual?

Politics is grandstanding. It's always been grandstanding and theater. The aformentioned "Have you no decency, sir?" speech was planned theater, too.

The trick is being right at the same time. Grassley and co are, this time, and the dems are not. And they pulled off their theater well.

So good on them. They politicked better.

that's not saying much. and while i'm sympathetic to kavanaugh, i don't believe it's lost on anyone that he's bullshitting at least a little, and almost certainly isn't as squeaky clean as he claimed to be. everyone -- even kavanaugh himself -- pretending otherwise to cover their asses or stick to the party line chips away at my patience tbh

Did you know cynicism is one of the leading causes of cancer?

He's not as squeaky clean as he's claimed? He's human, so probably not. I'm sure he's yelled at a nice old lady in traffic on a bad day, or not said anything when the grocer only rang up four apples when he actually had five in the bag, or something. But is he not as squeaky clean as people are making out in any way that matters? If so, present evidence. If not, stop giving yourself cancer needlessly.
 
I've mostly kept myself out of the loop for this whole thing and have no strong feelings one way or the other, but God-damnit if I didn't say the moral grandstanding on Twitter isn't starting to make me tilt my head. I look at shit like this;

doubt.png


And I always think to myself "It's not that simple, is it? There's a catch, right? There's always a catch." I see this logic from ye'ol typical Leftist Twitter all the time that if people just do the thing they want, it's not that big of a deal and everything will be hunky dory.

So I give up. Anyone want to give me a rundown of this shit?
 
I've mostly kept myself out of the loop for this whole thing and have no strong feelings one way or the other, but God-damnit if I didn't say the moral grandstanding on Twitter isn't starting to make me tilt my head. I look at shit like this;

View attachment 553316

And I always think to myself "It's not that simple, is it? There's a catch, right? There's always a catch." I see this logic from ye'ol typical Leftist Twitter all the time that if people just do the thing they want, it's not that big of a deal and everything will be hunky dory.

So I give up. Anyone want to give me a rundown of this shit?

The catch is that the FBI would have no jurisdiction to give a shit and they already examined his dirty underwear prior.

These assholes are hoping the FBI will be their tool to harass the man like Nixon's staffers used the IRS, and it's not even an effective idea because they've already cleared the man.
 
Can anybody tell me what the supposed FBI investigation was supposed to investigate? She said it happened, he said it didn’t. The witnesses of the supposed event said they didn’t remember anything like that. The “crime scene” is 35 years old, probably has been remodeled by now, if not owned by completely different people.

What specifically were they supposed to invesigate? Just perform Auto-Da-Fe on Kavanaugh and his family and friends until they confessed and could be executed as heathens?
 
Can anybody tell me what the supposed FBI investigation was supposed to investigate? She said it happened, he said it didn’t. The witnesses of the supposed event said they didn’t remember anything like that. The “crime scene” is 35 years old, probably has been remodeled by now, if not owned by completely different people.

What specifically were they supposed to invesigate? Just perform Auto-Da-Fe on Kavanaugh and his family and friends until they confessed and could be executed as heathens?
The idea here is the same as the Mueller investigation into "Russian Interference". There's nothing here, but if you investigate, you might get him on a process crime, a change of a pronoun or time here or there, prompting the proverbial A-HA! moment.
 
I've mostly kept myself out of the loop for this whole thing and have no strong feelings one way or the other, but God-damnit if I didn't say the moral grandstanding on Twitter isn't starting to make me tilt my head. I look at shit like this;

View attachment 553316

And I always think to myself "It's not that simple, is it? There's a catch, right? There's always a catch." I see this logic from ye'ol typical Leftist Twitter all the time that if people just do the thing they want, it's not that big of a deal and everything will be hunky dory.

So I give up. Anyone want to give me a rundown of this shit?

Ford's allegation is factually shaky and her best evidence is her strong conviction that it happened. Kavanaugh says it didn't happen and dug up a calendar showing he wasn't even around when she said it happened. No witness will corroborate her story under oath. It's exactly what you expect from a 35+ year old allegation of drunken pawing: there's zero useful evidence and we'll never know exactly what (if anything) happened.

However, regardless of Ford being correct or crazy, the Dems ONLY interest in any of this is trying to delay a seat getting filled with a conservative on the SC until mid-term elections, after which they think they will be able to permablock any nominations until they can fill the seat after presumably winning in 2020 (their thinking, not mine). They sincerely give zero fucks about Ford, she's a convenient tool to attempt to block an otherwise effortless SC seat filling.
 
Another thing, there was some protester who screeched at one of the politicians that she had been raped by somebody once, yadda yadda yadda, and the guy said something like “that’s terrible, you should go to the police.” And this was seen as a horrible thing to say. What did she want? For society to work like campus kangaroo courts where the worst punishment is being kicked out? I mean I understand that can fuck someone over, but it’s not prison.

Why is rape this terrible, horrible, life ruining thing for women where the perpetrators should not be charged in court, only in general opinion. Either it’s a serious crime that needs to go through the judicial system, or it’s nothing big that all you get is tumblr callouts as your punishment. Pick one.
 
Last edited:
Back