Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does Jeff Flake alone matter again?

i think he mattered more as someone on the committee. his vote hopefully counts for less in the senate bcs math. he basically neutered himself by voting yes to send it to the senate and threatening to vote no there tomorrow instead of next week after an fbi investigation. not sure if there will be one though.
 
i think he mattered more as someone on the committee. his vote hopefully counts for less in the senate bcs math. he basically neutered himself by voting yes to send it to the senate and threatening to vote no there tomorrow instead of next week after an fbi investigation. not sure if there will be one though.
He gives cover to anyone else who wants to cuck out and vote no. Republicans can only lose one vote (Flake is somehow a Republican) if the vote is along party lines. Manchin may vote against the Democrats though. I imagine it won't be able to get done with Flake covering for the no's and the media licking his balls over it
 
It would actually be funny if the FBI did do another background check and found nothing at all again.

If only to watch the Dems attack the FBI for being in BAHNALD DRUUUUUUUMPF PAHCKETS.

Because we have always been at war with East Asia, Eurasia, East Asia.
Yup. Let's ride this bitch right into the ground. No survivors.

I kinda feel sorry for Kav if this gets drug out longer. But I imagine he has also gotten numb by this point.
 
I'm kind of baffled and confused by wtf just happened.
Looks like Flake cucked - Dems are bragging now about the presumed FBI investigation - "you [the FBI] can do a lot in a week... Sen Flake has been proven to be an independent... we are in a better place than we are this morning." says Sen Klobuchar (CBS)
 
I wonder if Flakes flakery isn't actually a good thing in the end.

The crazies on the left will of course never stop calling Kavanaugh a rapist, but if he'd been pushed through right now I think quite a few normies would harbour doubt due to the "muh FBI investigation" narrative. A regular person wouldn't be informed on the full background and think it might think it looked like the repub were rushing Kav through, afraid of what an FBI investigation would find.

The extremists will never be satisfied, but a short extra investigation will probably satiate most wavering centrists.

FBI should say "We've told you it's impossible to investigate this. Refer to our last background check on him; that's our finding and conclusion in this matter."
That's basically what they will say, but in more and fancier words.

the FBI might find evidence during that time which might confirm Dr. Ford's testimony
They won't
 
AB256D25-E37D-458A-8865-EBE45B3BB1DF.jpeg


>I
>CANT
>EVEN

For a bunch of people that don’t understand teenagers they somehow still manage to talk like fucking teenagers
 
I wonder if Flakes flakery isn't actually a good thing in the end.

The crazies on the left will of course never stop calling Kavanaugh a rapist, but if he'd been pushed through right now I think quite a few normies would harbour doubt due to the "muh FBI investigation" narrative. A regular person wouldn't be informed on the full background and think it might think it looked like the repub were rushing Kav through, afraid of what an FBI investigation would find.

The extremists will never be satisfied, but a short extra investigation will probably satiate most wavering centrists.

more time = more time to lobby and manufacture outrage. the fbi could find absolutely nothing but if dems manage to manufacture enough outrage to shame some weaklings across the aisle to not confirming a judge with so big a scandal surrounding him, whatever its validity, then it's a political victory for them.
 
more time = more time to lobby and manufacture outrage. the fbi could find absolutely nothing but if dems manage to manufacture enough outrage to shame some weaklings across the aisle to not confirming a judge with so big a scandal surrounding him, whatever its validity, then it's a political victory for them.
Didn't the FBI already do two backgrounds checks on Kavanaugh, only to find nothing on him?
 
Back