Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It should also be noted that the background checks that were done regarding him were not just some online check like for a job or buying a gun. The checks he went through involved FBI agents going around asking his friends, family, and associates things.
They show up in the neighborhood you fucking grew up in asking anyone there if they knew you growing up, don't they?

EDIT:
The only FBI investigation I want is of Feinstein.
I am actually concerned with the Chinese spy that she had unwittingly hired.
 
It's also extremely funny watching the so called party of the working class gasp and collapse onto their fainting couches at the revelation that Kavanaugh likes to have a few beers after work.

Well, it makes Feinstein and Blumenthal uncomfortable when everyone else orders a beer and they're only having the blood of virgins.
 
Got a video from Body Language Ghost on Ford's testimony, for what it's worth, they haven't done Kavanaugh's yet.
I disagree regarding the prosecutor, though. Alan Dershowitz was right that they should have chosen a legal professional with experience in cross examining.
Why, she’s not the person who raped Ford 30 years ago.
Nah, but she did end up hiring a Chinese spy so I'm curious what other dumb shit she's done.
 
Y'know, Flake was frugal back when he was Representative. He didn't buy a house in DC to take his family out east (can't really blame him, honestly) nor did he rent an apartment, so he slept on a couch in his office during the week then went back home on the weekends. Arizona voters (particularly the Mormon population) loved that he was frugal and honest about it and showed he had family values, and that's why he was popular. Then something changed when he became a senator (although I think this change happened when he was still Representative), and as far as I know he's stopped doing all that and he's done nothing but flake out while hiding behind the Republican mask McCain put on him. The example my mom loves bringing up for why she stopped supporting him is that he attended his daughter's dance recital when he was supposed to be in Washington to vote on a bill because that was his goddamn job. (I'm trying to find the exact date this happened and what the bill was about--she's said it was marriage-related--but I wish the voting record had a way to organize the vote category.)

So if Flake is supposed to be this squeaky-clean good Mormon boy the voters liked, why do the Democrats have him so deep in their pockets that he was willing to ask for a delay in the vote or else he'd vote "nay"? Does he have something to hide that they know about and have threatened to leak it if he stepped out of line? Has he taken bribes? Has he cheated on his wife? That alone would kill the Mormon vote if it came out he did, and the rape allegations he had to take part in as part of the committee would've made him hot under the collar. But he's been bleeding supporters across the state anyway, and I think he knows this, hence why he's not running for reelection on top of his #NeverTrump stance. I wonder if fiscally he's conservative, but politically he's Democrat (or centrist that ended up leaning left for reasons)--which is weird that he's so against Trump, then. You'd think he'd be fawning over the success of the economy under Trump.

Again, I hope he becomes a pariah in Arizona once he's out of Washington, particularly in Snowflake. He should never live this down.
 
Got a video from Body Language Ghost on Ford's testimony, for what it's worth, they haven't done Kavanaugh's yet.
I disagree regarding the prosecutor, though. Alan Dershowitz was right that they should have chosen a legal professional with experience in cross examining.

Nah, but she did end up hiring a Chinese spy so I'm curious what other dumb shit she's done.
What a fucking grotesque hag, she looks like that Nazi dude that had his face melted off in Raiders. Also that reader is great it's like listening to that one woman who did lip reading who was given old Word War I footage to interpret.
 
Delaying the vote any further only rewards the use of a victim (real or imagined) to stymie the political process. This grandstanding cannot be rewarded.

Confirm Kavanaugh.

Afterwards the Democrats and Ford can push for an investigation by the relevant authorities if they want to. If there is proof that Kavanaugh was a rape-train organizing violent predator well...I'm pretty sure that's grounds for removal from the bench.
 
What a fucking grotesque hag, she looks like that Nazi dude that had his face melted off in Raiders.
Nah, bro. This is what she looks like:
z9jksxak1wo11.jpg
 
So, to summarize:

1. The FBI already performed six background checks on Brett Kavanaugh, and found nothing.
2. The alleged sexual assault incident happened over three decades ago, well past the statute of limitations (and thus far beyond the timeframe to conduct an investigation).
3. All evidence of the alleged sexual assault incident, assuming that it ever happened in the first place, has long since degraded and become lost forever.
4. Multiple people at the location of the alleged sexual assault incident completely contradicted the accuser, Christine Ford, by giving sworn-on-oath testimony (that they cannot contradict on penalty of perjury) that it never happened, and that Brett Kavanaugh wasn't even there.
5. Brett Kanavaugh himself provided evidence that he wasn't even there, using his stored calendar.
6. Christine Ford contradicted herself on multiple occasions, which the Democrats tried to pass off as her memory becoming faulty due the "severe trauma" she faced. Of course, she's still 100% certain that it was Brett Kavanaugh who almost raped her, a statement taken as gospel despite her faulty memory.
7. The FBI already stated that such a thing wasn't in their jurisdiction anyway, as sexual assault is not a federal crime.

There is literally no reason for the FBI to investigate anything whatsoever concerning the allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, and they should make that fact clear to the Democrats.
 
I'm a center-left leaning person (Sorry for the :powerlevel: ) and I gotta say I'm honestly lost.
The Democrats on this committee are so exceptional even Bill Maher called them out on this bullshit. First of:

1. Why the fuck are they so thirsty for the FBI to do an investigation? They do know if they wanted to launch an investigation they could have done it themselves right? Like, they know they do have that power right?
2. Didn't one of the senators on that committee flat out said that they are only doing this political stunt to leave the SCOTUS seat empty until the midterms?
3. All the witness testimony and evidence presented by Ford's are not just inconclusive but have been straight up refuted. What the fuck is there left to talk about?

Like, am I going crazy here? What the fuck is this autistic shit?
 
I'm a center-left leaning person (Sorry for the :powerlevel: ) and I gotta say I'm honestly lost.
The Democrats on this committee are so exceptional even Bill Maher called them out on this bullshit. First of:

1. Why the fuck are they so thirsty for the FBI to do an investigation? They do know if they wanted to launch an investigation they could have done it themselves right? Like, they know they do have that power right?
2. Didn't one of the senators on that committee flat out said that they are only doing this political to leave the SCOTUS seat empty until the midterms?
3. All the witness testimony and evidence presented by Ford's are not just inconclusive but have been straight up refuted. What the fuck is there left to talk about?

Like, am I going crazy here? What the fuck is this autistic shit?

This is what happens when you let women into politics
 
Oh for fuck's sake...

I am so goddamned sick of hearing the Dem's throw around the word "credible".

That word doesn't mean what you're trying to make it mean, you fucks. All it means it that it's possible to believe it. It doesn't mean you do, even, just that the claim isn't so ridiculous it's impossible.

That is not proof. That is not evidence. That's not even an acceptable standard of guilt in civil court, for fuck's sake.


All it means is that you can look at any evidence they bring to the table and not just disregard it as shit and throw it out. You HAVE to look at it with a critical view. The truth will never crack under pressure and questioning. Thats why Kavanaugh has buckled down and not cracked like the Hollywood cucks did under #metoo because unlike those slimeballs, the evidence is currently he didn't do this. The whole thing seemed disingenuous as fuck. If this whole thing was true why not bring it to the committee behind closed doors since you were so worried about the victim. Well, now the victim is known and the truth of of what happened that night is lost forever becuase someone wanted to have a "gotcha" ace in the hole as backup. Fuck the left. This is why the American voter has fucking abandoned you all in droves and keep leaving. You have shown yourselves to be the selfish and elitist people are deep down. I hope this serves as a wake up call for the younger crowd to upend the dead weight dragging their party down into the mud and actually get some real competition in the political relem.

Sorry for the long rant
 
The fact that everyone they listed as a witness against Kavanaugh made sworn statements they didn't see what was claimed, and there is no evidence he was even there at the time makes this whole thing a farce. It's closer to those crazy women who swear Eminem is their father's child, and have no proof but totally remember him sneaking into their window 15 years ago for a night of passionate celebrity lovemaking.
 
Letting them in just allowed the men to be catty bitches, too. Whereas before they just beat each other with canes to solve their differences.

Much more manly.
Why don't we just re-legalise duelling and skip all this passive-aggressive pussyfooting? Fuck, I'd almost welcome the return of trial by ordeal at this point. Let Feinstein be crushed beneath the metaphorical burden of lies while she's crushed under the very literal weight of a bunch of rocks. If we're going to abandon the cornerstones of Western civilisation and democrasy, let's go all-out.
 
Back