Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was listening to a podcast today and they pointed out something I never considered. Given the treatment of Kavanaugh what decent person will ever run for an elected office? This sort of thing ensures only the most corrupt and amoral people will bother being involved in politics.
Lol what? You don't need to run for office to have your life #MeToo'd
 
I think the only thing I'd expand on about your post is that, looking at the counties that went blue when surrounded by red, you can pretty immediately tell why: Large urban population centers.
And honestly, why is that the case?

Did Maxine Waters' Office Doxx GOP Senators During Kavanaugh Testimony?

by Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/29/2018 - 12:00
43
SHARES
TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint

The personal information of Republican Senators Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee and Orrin Hatch was posted to Wikipedia Thursday during the hearing of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

doxxed1.jpg


The information, which included home addresses and phone numbers, was posted to the senators' respective Wikipedia pages where users are allowed to made edits - all of which are logged by Wikipedia and include the editor's IP address.

As a result of the information being made public, Sen. Hatch's wife "has been receiving calls nonstop ON HER BIRTHDAY and their home address was made public," according to Caleb Hull, director of content at the Republican technology firm Targeted Victory.

The IP address used to "doxx" the Senators was quickly traced back to the House of Representatives...

house%20reps1.jpg


View image on Twitter


Mike Tokes

✔@MikeTokes


BREAKING: Republican Senators Lindsey Graham, Orrin Hatch, and Mike Lee were targeted and doxxed with their home/office addresses and home/cell phones being published online on Wikipedia through an anonymous IP address associated with the House of Representatives.

9:07 AM - Sep 28, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy




Mike Tokes

✔@MikeTokes

Replying to @MikeTokes

UPDATE: Wikipedia has reverted the pages of the Republican Senators and the previous edits publishing their personal information appear to be removed from the public archive.

The two vandal IP's, belonging to the US House of Reps. have engaged in Doxxing + Vandalism previously.

9:37 AM - Sep 28, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Upon further research, it appears that the IP address traces back to the office of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA).



Mike Tokes

✔@MikeTokes

Replying to @MikeTokes

UPDATE: When searching for activity associated with the House of Representatives IP's used in the doxxing of Republican Senators, we find a posted comment from August 22, 2018 registered to Kathleen Sengstock, the Senior Legislative Assistant for Representative MAXINE WATERS.

4:21 PM - Sep 29, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy


(Archive of IP address tied to Waters staffer Kathleen Sengstock here)


David Reaboi

✔@davereaboi

Replying to @davereaboi

If this is true—and Maxine Waters’ staffers doxxed several GOP Senators yesterday on Wikipedia—there should be hell to pay.

Waters has already called for direct action against GOP.

3:26 AM - Sep 29, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Waters has come under fire for advocating that her Democratic followers form into mobs and physically confront members of the Trump administration if they see them in public.

The Democratic rep - who doesn't live in the district she represents and paid her daughter $750,000 for Democratic fundraising activities, said to a crowd at a "Keep Families Together" rally on Saturday: "If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."

Waters' call to action came amid protests at the homes of Department of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen's house, as well as White House aide Stephen Miller's apartment, which makes the doxxing of GOP Senators all the more significant - especially if it came from Waters' office.

White House spokesman Raj Shah wrote on Twitter that the leaked information was "outrageous."


Raj Shah

✔@RajShah45


This is outrageous. Please stop https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1045439174646599680 …

Burgess Everett

✔@burgessev

Someone is doxxing GOP senators on a computer from the House of Representatives, began shortly after the Graham speech. I'm not going to retweet the account where this is posted.

8:26 AM - Sep 28, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Politics
Maxine Waters and her staff should be severely punished for this shit.

Doxxing someone, in and of itself, is morally gray.

Doxxing someone with the express intent of getting them "confronted" (read: harassed), in the context of you energizing your ideologue sycophant base, is morally wrong.
 
View attachment 554314

If anyone would know what a liar and a rapist is, it would be someone in Hollywood.

Also, someone should tell Samuel L. Jackson that hat makes him look like he's packing an extra chromosome.
Speaking of SW actors...
https://twitter.com/HamillHimself/status/1045728118810578944
plz no.png

My heart... again... Mark come on. I can understand you not liking the current administration but at least have valid non-spergy reasons for hating it (there are plenty of reasonable and valid critiques to choose from) instead of thinking everyone who disagrees with you is a vile bigot...

But regardless, now people are drawing hate art of Kavanaugh as part of a hashtag? Shit is reaching WW2-levels of propaganda but with a bigger population. And I like how basically they're saying the Republicans should "do the right thing" by shooting themselves in the foot. Of course some might actually want to do that since some Republicans seem to be more than happy with the idea of becoming the Dem's toothless rivals rather than be on the "wrong side of history" or upset the political status quo.

6snlqfovq0p11.jpg


It's gonna happen.
The Dems will abandon her, that's for sure, but the gullible politically-fueled masses will continue to believe her, treat it as truth and never let this shit die as long as they can use it as propaganda.
 
Last edited:
Here I assumed it referred to beer pong- the cups are arranged in a triangle.

nah you ask 100 people 99 will say its a 3 some or doing a chick with all 3 of her holes filled. even as a young middle school kid I knew that. and even everywhere online wikipedia, urban dic etc thats exactly what it is. not until he said that did you start to see the drinking game shit appear. id challenge anyone to find it being a drinking game that was actually uploaded with that definition before this past week. when someone tried changing the wikipedia on what it was that was minutes after he said that. same on urban dic only times saw that entered there was after he said all that. I guess it can be debated but I dont buy it, cant find that shit anywhere and im surprised more people haven't heard of it before

per atlantic- If “devil’s triangle” is a game that, indeed, involves bouncing coins into cups, there was, as of Thursday afternoon, seemingly no evidence of this on the internet, when people watching Kavanaugh’s hearing, inevitably, checked. No evidence, that is, until shortly after Kavanaugh testified as to his personalized definition of the term. At that point, congress-edits, the Twitter bot that tracks updates made to Wikipedia pages from congressional IP addresses, recorded a change made to the Wikipedia entry for “Devil’s Triangle”: “‘Devil’s Triangle’: a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.”Perhaps sensing that it needed an online presence, someone on Capitol Hill, operating from a congressional IP address, decided to update Wikipedia to include an entry for "* "Devil's Triangle", a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh."

Im sure if there was one ever known as it it would be at least ONE place on the internet with that as the definition before his statements, But there is 0. Again its not even that bad 17 year olds say shit like that. Would have been no qualms do just say yea I was immature

that can be debated tho but the renate 9 shit cant be. he shouldve just been up front about that. 17 year olds say and do stupid shit. the 9 of them didnt just put a girl in their year book they didnt chill with that much out of pure friendship. they all hooked up with her and made a club. wouldnt have been that awful to admit that because they were all only 17. thats the only thing I can say for sure was an outright lie

only other thing found slightly a bit funny is not even a year before this he stated multiple times how on point current day lie detectors are, and they are great and solve a lot of things. now of a sudden they aren't that good
 
Last edited:
nah you ask 100 people 99 will say its a 3 some or doing a chick with all 3 of her holes filled. even as a young middle school kid I knew that. and even everywhere online wikipedia, urban dic etc thats exactly what it is.

I once made a joke about "watching The Ten Commandments while reading Exodus; you might say I was burning the bush at both ends," and was immediately congratulated on making the filthiest joke ever. Because these people were atheists/agnostics/Biblical illiterates who spent all their time banging each other, not because I intended that meaning. None of my Christian friends even heard anything dirty in it at all.

What I'm saying is, if you automatically assume "it means sex" about something, it's probably because you're a degenerate like the people who contribute to Urban Dictionary.
 
3d1592ca0162f5e45d3b66d0e59d0c2c.png

>elite

He's only worth $1.2 million, and that's including all of his assets like his house and vehicle, and it's shared between him and his wife. I'd be more prone to agree with you here, but seriously $1.2 million dollars in total assets isn't jack shit compared to the "elite." Especially not the ones you can find currently in the Congress and the Senate like Nancy Pelosi, whose net worth is upwards of fucking $90,000,000+ and she's only the sixth highest-ranked member in the House.
Oh shit, $1.2 million is all it takes to be elite these days?
nah you ask 100 people 99 will say its a 3 some or doing a chick with all 3 of her holes filled. even as a young middle school kid I knew that. and even everywhere online wikipedia, urban dic etc thats exactly what it is. not until he said that did you start to see the drinking game shit appear. id challenge anyone to find it being a drinking game that was actually uploaded with that definition before this past week. when someone tried changing the wikipedia on what it was that was minutes after he said that. same on urban dic only times saw that entered there was after he said all that. I guess it can be debated but I dont buy it, cant find that shit anywhere and im surprised more people haven't heard of it before

per atlantic- If “devil’s triangle” is a game that, indeed, involves bouncing coins into cups, there was, as of Thursday afternoon, seemingly no evidence of this on the internet, when people watching Kavanaugh’s hearing, inevitably, checked. No evidence, that is, until shortly after Kavanaugh testified as to his personalized definition of the term. At that point, congress-edits, the Twitter bot that tracks updates made to Wikipedia pages from congressional IP addresses, recorded a change made to the Wikipedia entry for “Devil’s Triangle”: “‘Devil’s Triangle’: a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.”Perhaps sensing that it needed an online presence, someone on Capitol Hill, operating from a congressional IP address, decided to update Wikipedia to include an entry for "* "Devil's Triangle", a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh."

Im sure if there was one ever known as it it would be at least ONE place on the internet with that as the definition before his statements, But there is 0. Again its not even that bad 17 year olds say shit like that. Would have been no qualms do just say yea I was immature

that can be debated tho but the renate 9 shit cant be. he shouldve just been up front about that. 17 year olds say and do stupid shit. the 9 of them didnt just put a girl in their year book they didnt chill with that much out of pure friendship. they all hooked up with her and made a club. wouldnt have been that awful to admit that because they were all only 17. thats the only thing I can say for sure was an outright lie

only other thing found slightly a bit funny is not even a year before this he stated multiple times how on point current day lie detectors are, and they are great and solve a lot of things. now of a sudden they aren't that good
Yeah, the closest to Devil's Triangle I ever heard was a Devil's Threesome and that's M/M/F
 
nah you ask 100 people 99 will say its a 3 some or doing a chick with all 3 of her holes filled. even as a young middle school kid I knew that. and even everywhere online wikipedia, urban dic etc thats exactly what it is. not until he said that did you start to see the drinking game shit appear. id challenge anyone to find it being a drinking game that was actually uploaded with that definition before this past week. when someone tried changing the wikipedia on what it was that was minutes after he said that. same on urban dic only times saw that entered there was after he said all that. I guess it can be debated but I dont buy it, cant find that shit anywhere and im surprised more people haven't heard of it before

per atlantic- If “devil’s triangle” is a game that, indeed, involves bouncing coins into cups, there was, as of Thursday afternoon, seemingly no evidence of this on the internet, when people watching Kavanaugh’s hearing, inevitably, checked. No evidence, that is, until shortly after Kavanaugh testified as to his personalized definition of the term. At that point, congress-edits, the Twitter bot that tracks updates made to Wikipedia pages from congressional IP addresses, recorded a change made to the Wikipedia entry for “Devil’s Triangle”: “‘Devil’s Triangle’: a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.”Perhaps sensing that it needed an online presence, someone on Capitol Hill, operating from a congressional IP address, decided to update Wikipedia to include an entry for "* "Devil's Triangle", a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh."

Im sure if there was one ever known as it it would be at least ONE place on the internet with that as the definition before his statements, But there is 0. Again its not even that bad 17 year olds say shit like that. Would have been no qualms do just say yea I was immature

that can be debated tho but the renate 9 shit cant be. he shouldve just been up front about that. 17 year olds say and do stupid shit. the 9 of them didnt just put a girl in their year book they didnt chill with that much out of pure friendship. they all hooked up with her and made a club. wouldnt have been that awful to admit that because they were all only 17. thats the only thing I can say for sure was an outright lie

only other thing found slightly a bit funny is not even a year before this he stated multiple times how on point current day lie detectors are, and they are great and solve a lot of things. now of a sudden they aren't that good
It doesn't matter what it's current definition is. What matters is what the definition was for teenagers in 1982 in Maryland.

Citing modern sources will not give you accurate historic definitions. Slang language, especially that used by teenagers, has changed a lot in the last 36 years.

Find me an old issue of Hustler that defines it that way. Not fucking Urban Dictionary or anywhere else on the damn internet.
 
He's only worth $1.2 million, and that's including all of his assets like his house and vehicle, and it's shared between him and his wife. I'd be more prone to agree with you here, but seriously $1.2 million dollars in total assets isn't jack shit compared to the "elite." Especially not the ones you can find currently in the Congress and the Senate like Nancy Pelosi, whose net worth is upwards of fucking $90,000,000+ and she's only the sixth highest-ranked member in the House.

Being a judge pays worse than i thought. Ford's just gotten over $730,000 added to her assets i wonder how much she's worth.
 
nah you ask 100 people 99 will say its a 3 some or doing a chick with all 3 of her holes filled. even as a young middle school kid I knew that. and even everywhere online wikipedia, urban dic etc thats exactly what it is. not until he said that did you start to see the drinking game shit appear. id challenge anyone to find it being a drinking game that was actually uploaded with that definition before this past week. when someone tried changing the wikipedia on what it was that was minutes after he said that. same on urban dic only times saw that entered there was after he said all that. I guess it can be debated but I dont buy it, cant find that shit anywhere and im surprised more people haven't heard of it before

per atlantic- If “devil’s triangle” is a game that, indeed, involves bouncing coins into cups, there was, as of Thursday afternoon, seemingly no evidence of this on the internet, when people watching Kavanaugh’s hearing, inevitably, checked. No evidence, that is, until shortly after Kavanaugh testified as to his personalized definition of the term. At that point, congress-edits, the Twitter bot that tracks updates made to Wikipedia pages from congressional IP addresses, recorded a change made to the Wikipedia entry for “Devil’s Triangle”: “‘Devil’s Triangle’: a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.”Perhaps sensing that it needed an online presence, someone on Capitol Hill, operating from a congressional IP address, decided to update Wikipedia to include an entry for "* "Devil's Triangle", a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh."

Im sure if there was one ever known as it it would be at least ONE place on the internet with that as the definition before his statements, But there is 0. Again its not even that bad 17 year olds say shit like that. Would have been no qualms do just say yea I was immature

that can be debated tho but the renate 9 shit cant be. he shouldve just been up front about that. 17 year olds say and do stupid shit. the 9 of them didnt just put a girl in their year book they didnt chill with that much out of pure friendship. they all hooked up with her and made a club. wouldnt have been that awful to admit that because they were all only 17. thats the only thing I can say for sure was an outright lie

only other thing found slightly a bit funny is not even a year before this he stated multiple times how on point current day lie detectors are, and they are great and solve a lot of things. now of a sudden they aren't that good

Dude, give it a rest already. And please stop pm’ing everyone about the same minutiae. Like I told you in private, the Devils Triangle/Threesome/whatever might mean some exotic porn moves TODAY. It had no such meaning back in 1982. Remember we didn’t have fun and easy access to porn or exotic kinks back then. Certainly not during high school. Similarly you will find very little of our slang, language, drinking games, etc posted online. Because unless it was written down in a formal publication that was later archived, it was never put on the internet. All of this was pre internet. Pre social media. There were no broadly common terms like this. There were no memes. It was all local schoolyard level.

You keep applying modern context to stuff and people from 30-40 years ago. It is clear you have no actual knowledge of the time period you are talking about. Please just give it up. Stop parroting the talking points of some Millenial who thinks what applies to them always applied to everybody.

And once again, perhaps the weakest part of this story is this “lifelong trauma” angle. Even if you believe this woman, she spent a few moments in an uncomfortable situation, then quickly got out no harm done, nobodies clothes ruffled. When all participants were in high school and falling down drunk. 80’s kids weren’t traumatized by this sort of thing. They were still free range kids who were allowed to experience pain, bleeding, danger and the frequent failure. An 80’s woman would not have viewed this as sexual assault. Nobodies happy bits were out and on display. No bodily fluids exchanged. She would have gotten over it and moved on. This was not the same thing as actually being raped. This does not become sexual assault or even traumatic until modern academic feminism explains to this woman that what happened back then was surely rape, and of course caused every personal failing in her life since then. Every bad decision, personal failure and character flaw was all caused by toxic misogyny.

If you can hunt down an archive of Professor Fords ratemyprofessor.com pages from the past decade. The original were mysteriously scrubbed from the internet last week. See what her actual students have to say about her and her character. All from years before any of this came out.

And go ahead and accuse me of victim blaming. I have spent a lifetime dealing with and treating real victims. This woman is raising so many red flags for me that I doubt she has experienced any trauma that wasn’t implanted in her for p9kitical purpose.
 
only other thing found slightly a bit funny is not even a year before this he stated multiple times how on point current day lie detectors are, and they are great and solve a lot of things. now of a sudden they aren't that good
I've seen you say this a few times now, and the only thing I can find relating to this is this ruling Kavanaugh made from 2016: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20160520134.

The case is about a student trying to file a FOIA against the Department of Defense about how law enforcement agencies use polygraph tests. The part that's relevant is near the end when the DoD tries to say that they can't release the information because it would fall under clearance and investigatory processes, and also inherently relate to law enforcement. Kavanaugh says that polygraphs count as inherently relating to law enforcement by citing a Supreme Court ruling that says law enforcement includes proactive steps.

He rules that the information shouldn't be released because he agrees with the District Court's ruling that it would create "at least a risk that subversive individuals will be armed with advanced knowledge of the procedures used by the United States to screen applicants for sensitive employment positions and security clearances." That's a pretty far cry from "Lie detectors are great, and solve a lot of things." He really just agreed that it's a practice used by the government to screen for some positions, and because of that, information on how they're used shouldn't be made public, regardless of how well they actually work.
 
Last edited:
And go ahead and accuse me of victim blaming. I have spent a lifetime dealing with and treating real victims. This woman is raising so many red flags for me that I doubt she has experienced any trauma that wasn’t implanted in her for p9kitical purpose.

:offtopic:, but bless you for helping victims. I hope this whole stupid business doesn't make your job harder than it already is; the last thing you need is for-profit, professional victims talking over the people who are genuinely hurting and in need.
 
nah you ask 100 people 99 will say its a 3 some or doing a chick with all 3 of her holes filled. even as a young middle school kid I knew that. and even everywhere online wikipedia, urban dic etc thats exactly what it is. not until he said that did you start to see the drinking game shit appear. id challenge anyone to find it being a drinking game that was actually uploaded with that definition before this past week. when someone tried changing the wikipedia on what it was that was minutes after he said that. same on urban dic only times saw that entered there was after he said all that. I guess it can be debated but I dont buy it, cant find that shit anywhere and im surprised more people haven't heard of it before

per atlantic- If “devil’s triangle” is a game that, indeed, involves bouncing coins into cups, there was, as of Thursday afternoon, seemingly no evidence of this on the internet, when people watching Kavanaugh’s hearing, inevitably, checked. No evidence, that is, until shortly after Kavanaugh testified as to his personalized definition of the term. At that point, congress-edits, the Twitter bot that tracks updates made to Wikipedia pages from congressional IP addresses, recorded a change made to the Wikipedia entry for “Devil’s Triangle”: “‘Devil’s Triangle’: a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.”Perhaps sensing that it needed an online presence, someone on Capitol Hill, operating from a congressional IP address, decided to update Wikipedia to include an entry for "* "Devil's Triangle", a popular drinking game enjoyed by friends of Judge Brett Kavanaugh."

Im sure if there was one ever known as it it would be at least ONE place on the internet with that as the definition before his statements, But there is 0. Again its not even that bad 17 year olds say shit like that. Would have been no qualms do just say yea I was immature

that can be debated tho but the renate 9 shit cant be. he shouldve just been up front about that. 17 year olds say and do stupid shit. the 9 of them didnt just put a girl in their year book they didnt chill with that much out of pure friendship. they all hooked up with her and made a club. wouldnt have been that awful to admit that because they were all only 17. thats the only thing I can say for sure was an outright lie

only other thing found slightly a bit funny is not even a year before this he stated multiple times how on point current day lie detectors are, and they are great and solve a lot of things. now of a sudden they aren't that good

You know, before Assassin's Creed Syndicate was made huge amounts of slang in that game had to be meticulusly researched by people coming to London and scouring written records. Because it wasn't online.

I could wax lyrical about rural East Pillockshire, its dialect and stories which I know are not online. Indeed the few sources you can find about our dialect are barely scratchng the surface. There are variences between the north and south, and some words whch are exclusive to a single town.

Hell I could even talk about the fucking handshake which became a symbol of our school and is still in use there today some 15 years after I left because four whole people know its origin story and one of them's fucking dead.

But no, because "ITS NOT ONLNE ITS NOT TRUE KAVS IS LYING REEEEEEE".

Here's a theory for you. dumb jock shows off the game, calls it something very sexual to clueless jocks in training for a laugh. Clueless Jocks continue to call it that for the rest of the 80s.

Here's a more solid example: Negro used to be a respectable word to call black people (until the mid 80s) and Gay used to mean excitable and happy time.
 
I've seen you say this a few times now, and the only thing I can find relating to this is this ruling Kavanaugh made from 2016: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20160520134.

The case is about a student trying to file a FOIA against the Department of Defense about how law enforcement agencies use polygraph tests. The part that's relevant is near the end when the DoD tries to say that they can't release the information because it would fall under clearance and investigatory processes, and also inherently relate to law enforcement. He says that polygraphs count as inherently relating to law enforcement by citing a Supreme Court ruling that says law enforcement includes proactive steps.

He rules that the information shouldn't be released because he agrees with the District Court's ruling that it would create "at least a risk that subversive individuals will be armed with advanced knowledge of the procedures used by the United States to screen applicants for sensitive employment positions and security clearances." That a pretty far cry from "Lie detectors are great, and solve a lot of things." He really just agreed that it's a practice used by the government to screen for some positions, and because of that, information on how they're used shouldn't be made public.
The science (or pseudoscience) of polygraphs and their usefulness in law enforcement hiring processes isn't really a topic for this thread but they usually involve a battery of control questions that establish a baseline when they're used to screen applicants before the actual questions are asked. Even then they're still pretty controversial to say the least in that aspect. The polygraph that Ford was given literally had just two questions, both of them basically asking her 'did you lie?'
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...anaugh-sexual-assault-allegations/1434270002/
 
:offtopic:, but bless you for helping victims. I hope this whole stupid business doesn't make your job harder than it already is; the last thing you need is for-profit, professional victims talking over the people who are genuinely hurting and in need.

Thank you. Injuries took me off the street years ago. These days I am administration. And well removed from individual crisis. Looking at what the field people are subjected to these days, I am almost glad not to be there. I’ve seen too many false accusations from clinically insane meth heads damage or end good peoples careers because of modern politics. Friends still out there tell me a lot of EMS crews won’t enter a scene unless there is a body cam equipped cop present anymore.
 
For what it's worth, I enjoy seeing all of the shitlibs kvetch and go full on bugman creeper over every single aspect of Kavanaugh's existence, and to top it off, Dems are finally embracing the "die white cis male scum" dogma. Trump and the GOP better not waste any opportunities in regards to amplifying this insanity on political ads and rallies.
 
I've seen you say this a few times now, and the only thing I can find relating to this is this ruling Kavanaugh made from 2016: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20160520134.

The case is about a student trying to file a FOIA against the Department of Defense about how law enforcement agencies use polygraph tests. The part that's relevant is near the end when the DoD tries to say that they can't release the information because it would fall under clearance and investigatory processes, and also inherently relate to law enforcement. Kavanaugh says that polygraphs count as inherently relating to law enforcement by citing a Supreme Court ruling that says law enforcement includes proactive steps.

He rules that the information shouldn't be released because he agrees with the District Court's ruling that it would create "at least a risk that subversive individuals will be armed with advanced knowledge of the procedures used by the United States to screen applicants for sensitive employment positions and security clearances." That's a pretty far cry from "Lie detectors are great, and solve a lot of things." He really just agreed that it's a practice used by the government to screen for some positions, and because of that, information on how they're used shouldn't be made public, regardless of how well they actually work.

The more the left digs up his old rulings to smear him, the more I think he's got the perfect candor to be a SCOTUS appointee....
 
Back