Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    4,032
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Patron and NoFeline
JollyJackal: deleted social media. Candy Corn dog fursuit by stuffed panda. Probable murrsuiter.

[/spoiler]
*confirmed.
He's also known as JollyZJackal and according to another user's post, has previously had sex with a minor.
As mentioned by myself earlier in the thread, his social medias have been dead seemingly for a while, especially his Telegram, though I wouldn't be surprised if these leaks are a reason for this. He and his wife SenkaVixen/Ichi_Black have a large interest in non-consensual, vore and feral. He engages in catfishing as a female. Senka makes shitty homemade porn and sells it via her Telegram group for stupid money, Jolly is often involved in this content in-suit.

My experience with these two is shitty and I'd love to give more info, but as much as I hate the slaphead bastard I obviously only will if he's involved enough for it. This thread and it's income of autists is fucking infuriating.

Edit:
  • bloowuff: murrsuiter
This scrawny mess has been extremely quiet in Telegram groups for the past two weeks or so - very unlike him as he is your typical furry "femboy" who has a triangular arse and massive feet yet is absurdly desirable to other faggots. To me, a very suspicious individual.
 
Last edited:
Fuck, he had to call it quits, the content was too Islamic even for him. Damn.

Also, dare I ask what a murrsuiter is? I ain't googling that shit nigga.
 
Last thing that got Jim this pissed on video was the dentist, can you blame him though? how fucking dare someone try to defend this shit and have the gall to try and punch back when they're shat upon from a great height for it

Fuck, he had to call it quits, the content was too Islamic even for him. Damn.

Also, dare I ask what a murrsuiter is? I ain't googling that shit nigga.

According to my now ruined browser history, it's basically just a sexualised fursuit
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Spunt
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NoFeline
I'm not going to go into detail, but their cloacas are much more delicate, size or not it would kill a chicken :, (
The chicken actually dies from exhaustion, some people kill the chicken while doing it, because "the twitching feels great"
I used to live close to a farm and apparently guys there just fuck anything that crawls under the sun.
 
If the only purpose for registering an account here is to inform users that you have contacted the authorities in your country, that you have gone to the UN or that you have been to an embassy to inform on someone you kinda sorta think may have abused a dog, don't bother. Please.

Thanks.
 
The chicken actually dies from exhaustion, some people kill the chicken while doing it, because "the twitching feels great"
I used to live close to a farm and apparently guys there just fuck anything that crawls under the sun.

I won't deny your experience as being true, but in my head the general slant of human behavior would seem to lean towards people who actually protect and care for these animals as their livelihood and sustenance and actually know them beyond just being things that stand out on the roadside fields as you drive between major cities, that they would respect and love them more often than view them as living sex toys.

Heck a lot of the outrage regarding the recent zoophilia ring bust in Pennsylvania was due to those peoples respect for the animals they live with, even if they are destined to be used for food.

What's the monitary value of a chicken that was raised and grown to be large enough for a person to do that to them amnyway? It would be like if Tenga cups were 100 dollars each and took years to prepare.

Even on a practical level regardless of morals or personal safety, this shit makes no sense.

It's like they listened to the complete discography of Wesley Willis, and decided "hey, that sounds pretty hot" not realizing that the acts of bestiality Willis described in his songs were intended to be so disgusting that they would offend and frighten away the hell demons that haunted Willis during schizophrenic episodes.
 
I won't deny your experience as being true, but in my head the general slant of human behavior would seem to lean towards people who actually protect and care for these animals as their livelihood and sustenance and actually know them beyond just being things that stand out on the roadside fields as you drive between major cities, that they would respect and love them more often than view them as living sex toys.

Heck a lot of the outrage regarding the recent zoophilia ring bust in Pennsylvania was due to those peoples respect for the animals they live with, even if they are destined to be used for food.

What's the monitary value of a chicken that was raised and grown to be large enough for a person to do that to them amnyway? It would be like if Tenga cups were 100 dollars each and took years to prepare.

Even on a practical level regardless of morals or personal safety, this shit makes no sense.

It's like they listened to the complete discography of Wesley Willis, and decided "hey, that sounds pretty hot" not realizing that the acts of bestiality Willis described in his songs were intended to be so disgusting that they would offend and frighten away the hell demons that haunted Willis during schizophrenic episodes.
I feel like you are romanticising bucking a chicken a bit too much.
Sure, some people might have feelings for animals, so they "make love" with them, but at the end of the day a chicken now knows how it feels to have man sausage exploring her insides.
It is morally wrong to screw animals, it's an animalistic act we are supposed to be past at this point in time, defending these acts in any way is wrong, even if the animal does not risk catching an illness and actually likes being hold by a horny guy, allowing that is embracing moral relativism.
If you give them your hand, soon enough they'll take the whole arm.
 
I feel like you are romanticising bucking a chicken a bit too much.
Sure, some people might have feelings for animals, so they "make love" with them, but at the end of the day a chicken now knows how it feels to have man sausage exploring her insides.
It is morally wrong to screw animals, it's an animalistic act we are supposed to be past at this point in time, defending these acts in any way is wrong, even if the animal does not risk catching an illness and actually likes being hold by a horny guy, allowing that is embracing moral relativism.
If you give them your hand, soon enough they'll take the whole arm.

Wait, did you think I was defending raping chickens?

Because I absolutely wasn't, the mere thought of it ranks among the worst shit I've yet heard in a thread that makes Dante's Inferno look like a birthday party at a McDonalds Playplace.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Not an_ime g_irl
What's the monitary value of a chicken that was raised and grown to be large enough for a person to do that to them amnyway? It would be like if Tenga cups were 100 dollars each and took years to prepare.

Even on a practical level regardless of morals or personal safety, this shit makes no sense.

You can still eat the chicken afterwards, dummy.
 
Back