Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pokéfags bitching and moaning about politics they can barely understand is such a good source of salt, and the Kavanaugh hearing has been causing so many folks to froth at the mouth that I expect it to blow up again next month like it did 2016 election night. (The Serebii political thread is 500 pages of brain cancer, so this is the page this screencap's from. Bulbagarden may be funnier/worse for all I know.)

View attachment 559088
I'll take "Reasons Why Democrats Keep Bleeding Voters" for $400, Alex.
'it's a pretty brazen cover-up'
orrrrrrrr it's how the process works and has always worked. no other fbi background check on a prospective justice has been shown to the public as far as i know, why would that change now?
 
So what exactly is the consensus, beyond bias? The back and forth is to be expected, but was it yet found as to whether or not she lied?

I just got home and haven't been keeping up, pardon.
The general consensus among sane people is that Brett Kavanaugh is innocent and that Christine Ford is lying.
 
So what exactly is the consensus, beyond bias? The back and forth is to be expected, but was it yet found as to whether or not she lied?

I just got home and haven't been keeping up, pardon.
It's her word against his and none of her witnesses or an FBI investigation have turned up anything to say otherwise. What has turned up is an ex-boyfriend who says she purgered herself during the polygraph test. She hasn't been interviewed by the FBI and a point brought up itt, and that I believe as well, is that's because they know that doing so would either cause her to purger herself again or force her to admit that she did so previously and the FBI wants to be done with this bullshit.
 
Bleh just do it on Monday. There will be way more attention on it and the meltdowns will be much better.
And if they do it on Monday, the turnout of disrupting hecklers will hopefully be lower because presumably a percentage of them have day jobs and are not just paid protesters who were bused in by Soros and shills
 
BREAKING: Republican Senator May Force Kavanaugh Vote Delay
https://archive.is/FaXCE

Of all the things!

Bless Daines for wanting to be at his daughter's wedding and it sucks the timing's poor, but when you run for a government position, you've pretty much given your livelihood to serve your country, and the country comes first before your family. That is what you were hired for, Daines, so do your job or the people of Montana will fire you.
 
The general consensus among sane people is that Brett Kavanaugh is innocent and that Christine Ford is lying.
*sees that @sperginity has rated disagree*

Yeah. No.

Why do you believe that Ford is at all credible in this venture @sperginity?

sperginity disagrees.png
 
Bless Daines for wanting to be at his daughter's wedding and it sucks the timing's poor, but when you run for a government position, you've pretty much given your livelihood to serve your country, and the country comes first before your family. That is what you were hired for, Daines, so do your job or the people of Montana will fire you.
To be fair, it wouldn’t have interfered if this shit hadn’t been delayed to hell and back repeatedly.
 
It's her word against his and none of her witnesses or an FBI investigation have turned up anything to say otherwise. What has turned up is an ex-boyfriend who says she purgered herself during the polygraph test. She hasn't been interviewed by the FBI and a point brought up itt, and that I believe as well, is that's because they know that doing so would either cause her to purger herself again or force her to admit that she did so previously and the FBI wants to be done with this bullshit.

It's a little more complicated than that, but also simpler. The FBI has hours of sworn testimony from Ford before the Senate. There aren't many more questions that FBI wants to ask her in terms of her story. That's all on the record. Any follow up questions the FBI may have get to the credibility of her story. Oneof her key points was she named her lifelong Best Friend Leyland Keyser as a witness who was at the party. Supposedly the "Other girl" that was there. Ford also stated that Ms. Keyser is undergoing a medical crisis and has likely had diminished memories and cognitive functions as a result. Do note Ford made these claims UNDER OATH> Keyser's family apparently reached out to the FBI, who interviewed her under oath. Keyser swore under penalty of Felony, that 1. She was never at any such party, and to her knowledge no such party ever occured within her social circles. 2. She had never in her life met Brett Kavanaugh, and 3. She was of perfectly sound mind, her serious medical issues had no impact on her memory, and she clearly remembered High School much better than Dr Ford remembered 2 weeks ago!

So now the FBI had a decision point. They could interview Ford. But what would the point be. Her attorney would have her take the 5th. Any other answer would either A. Be a clear lie to the FBI triggering a felony prosecution (and no way the FBI could avoid that in todays climate) or B. Admit she lied under oath to the Senate thus triggering Perjury charges. By not interviewing her the FBI kicks it back to the Senate. The FBI provided enough evidence to the Senate to make it clear they did not believe Ford's story. But perjury only gets charged if the Senate votes on it and refers it back to the Justice Department. It is the Senate's decision, not the FBI's. By not interviewing her the FBI avoids the inescapable perjury trap that would drop the whole mess in their lap long term and dumps it back on the Senate where it belongs.

You can also see why the FBI stopped investigating after two days. They had enough to convince them that the witness was full of shit regarding core elements of her story. And that she was willfully full of shit about flavorful corraborating or supporting details (her under oath description of Keyser's health and memories. It was a clear intent to deceive.) And let me tell you Critically or Terminally Ill Mother of 2 makes for a much more sympathetic and compelling witness than the Crazy Cat Lady.
 
Even after all this, Flake might still flake.

https://archive.is/OavXz
Good God. If I was a senator I'd make a motion to censure Flake. Dude needs to stop being a grandstanding pussy and just do whatever the fuck he's going to do.

And before anyone says "he hasn't done anything worth a censure," the senate can censure for "any act which brings the Senate into disrepute." Jeff Flake's entire existence brings the whole nation into disrepute.
 
Good God. If I was a senator I'd make a motion to censure Flake. Dude needs to stop being a grandstanding pussy and just do whatever the fuck he's going to do.

And before anyone says "he hasn't done anything worth a censure," the senate can censure for "any act which brings the Senate into disrepute." Jeff Flake's entire existence brings the whole nation into disrepute.
Flake has already stated he's going to be retiring from politics when his term is up, so I'm mostly thinking his motives are the equivalent of some terminally ill person going out to do all the hardcore and outrageous shit they can possibly do while they're still kickin' as their clock is tickin' to 0
 
Flake has already stated he's going to be retiring from politics when his term is up, so I'm mostly thinking his motives are the equivalent of some terminally ill person going out to do all the hardcore and outrageous shit they can possibly do while they're still kickin' as their clock is tickin' to 0

Flake wants a cushy MSNBC gig and he needs these kinds of anti-Trump dissenting maneuvers to justify the move ala Megyn Kelly.
 
Back