Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honestly though, what do you guys think of the view count on the SNL video?
View attachment 559375
That looks like a lot of idiots.

There is that shane guys 8(EIGHT) part series on logan paul and each video is doing those numbers. Which just shows how fucking irrelevant SNL is when a gay guy rambling for 40mins is getting equivalent views.
 
Honestly though, what do you guys think of the view count on the SNL video?
View attachment 559375
That looks like a lot of idiots.

I think that YouTube is giving it the very top slot; I've never watched SNL in my life, let alone on YouTube, and there it is, first thin you see when you log in. Same goes for incognito. Probably inflating the numbers a wee bit (assuming they're not just cheating.)

There is that shane guys 8(EIGHT) part series on logan paul and each video is doing those numbers. Which just shows how fucking irrelevant SNL is when a gay guy rambling for 40mins is getting equivalent views.

I remember someone mentioning this a while back- "Mathematically, Jimmy Kimmel and Conan O'Brien are just mid-tier YouTubers who are on TV for some fucking reason. They'd probably lose to ReviewBrah in the same time slot."
 
Recently, I was digging through an old box of personal shit from the move and one thing I found was a CD copy of Denis Leary's No Cure for Cancer. And while a lot can be aid of Leary either homaging or outright ripping off jokes, his delivery and what he covered was pretty much spot the fuck on:

Denis Leary said:
And I also don't go for this other thing now, with MTV being so big where you get a band that gets a hit video, and all of the sudden they think that they're like icons and they can tell us how to feel about environmental issues and how to vote and stuff. You know what I'm talking about? Like R.E.M.? "Shiny happy people--"

Hey! Hey, hey, hey, hey! Pull that bus over to the side of the pretentiousness turnpike, all right?! I want everybody off the bus. I want the shiny people over here, and the happy people over here, okay? I represent angry gun-toting meat-eating fucking people, all right? Sit down and shut the fuck up, Michael! Don Henley's gonna tell me how to vote. I don't fucking think so, okay? I got two words for Don Henley: Joe Fucking Walsh.

Thanks for calling, Don. How long's your pony tail now?

In a lot of ways Leary was prophetic as far as this shit was concerned with random celebs feeling they have the right to tell us how to feel about shit.
 
If the FBI investigation leaks, I bet we find out that Ford is tied to the DNC, Feinstein or some other Leftwing operation by the evidence.
We don't even have to wait for the FBI report to know that. One very suspicious individual is Monica L McLean, a former(?) FBI agent and spokesperson who worked with Preet Bharara (Served Chuck Schumer as chief counsel and US attorney for southern NY appointed by Obama). Bharara also was notably fired by Trump after Jeff Sessions asked all US attorneys appointed by Obama to resign and he refused. McLean is also very likely the 'beach friends' refered to in Ford's testimony to the committee (the same testimony where she didn't know how to get information out without going to he press, while being BFF with a 24y long FBI agent and former lawyer... and chose not to name these 'beach friends').

Anyway, Ford's Ex named McLean as the lady being coached by Ford on how to pass a polygraph. McLean also put her name on a document saying Ford's testimony is so honest and brave and the committee should just listen and believe. Ford testified she wrote the Feinstein letter at Rehoboth Beach, DE which just so happens to the area that McLean is listed as her current address and an inactive California law license addressed too. McLean was photoed at the testimony and maybe with creepy porn lawyer (i'm not sure its the same person).

In the last few hours this broke:
Leland Keyser told investigators that Ford's friend, former FBI agent Monica McLean, had urged her to alter the original statement that she gave about not remembering any such party and not knowing Kavanaugh, The Wall Street Journal reported.

In a statement, David Laufman, McLean's attorney, denied the allegations, writing: "Any notion or claim that Ms. McLean pressured Leland Keyser to alter Ms. Keyser’s account of what she recalled concerning the alleged incident between Dr. Ford and Brett Kavanaugh is absolutely false."
Interesting to note that her attorney David Laufman just so happened to oversee the Clinton email investigation...
 
This one is for you random poster who couldn't believe Devil's Triangle could be a drinking game
http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/04/kavanaugh-devils-triangle-boofing/

That had to be the argument I heard the most from people. That there was “no way” it was a drinking game and that it was obviously a sex thing. These were people that were acting like there are a set amount of drinking games that exist and no other games exist outside of beer pong and flipcup.

It’s...really easy to make a drinking game. Literally take alchohol, add thing, slap on name if you’re feeling froggy. A bunch of friends and I made up one revolving around the 1984 Conan the Barbarian movie years ago... There’s one that’s a board game with Pokémon. TFS made one out of their Bloodborne stream.
 
We don't even have to wait for the FBI report to know that. One very suspicious individual is Monica L McLean, a former(?) FBI agent and spokesperson who worked with Preet Bharara (Served Chuck Schumer as chief counsel and US attorney for southern NY appointed by Obama). Bharara also was notably fired by Trump after Jeff Sessions asked all US attorneys appointed by Obama to resign and he refused. McLean is also very likely the 'beach friends' refered to in Ford's testimony to the committee (the same testimony where she didn't know how to get information out without going to he press, while being BFF with a 24y long FBI agent and former lawyer... and chose not to name these 'beach friends').

Anyway, Ford's Ex named McLean as the lady being coached by Ford on how to pass a polygraph. McLean also put her name on a document saying Ford's testimony is so honest and brave and the committee should just listen and believe. Ford testified she wrote the Feinstein letter at Rehoboth Beach, DE which just so happens to the area that McLean is listed as her current address and an inactive California law license addressed too. McLean was photoed at the testimony and maybe with creepy porn lawyer (i'm not sure its the same person).

In the last few hours this broke:
Interesting to note that her attorney David Laufman just so happened to oversee the Clinton email investigation...

It's sadly no surprise at all that all roads lead back to Rome.

Rome in this case being Clinton.
 
Recently, I was digging through an old box of personal shit from the move and one thing I found was a CD copy of Denis Leary's No Cure for Cancer. And while a lot can be aid of Leary either homaging or outright ripping off jokes, his delivery and what he covered was pretty much spot the fuck on:



In a lot of ways Leary was prophetic as far as this shit was concerned with random celebs feeling they have the right to tell us how to feel about shit.

FWIW I love that album. If Leary was ripping off Hicks, he did the material better. Hicks, IMO, seemed to be more interested in pushing an agenda than being funny.
 
what does Bette Midler mean by "N" word and enslaved, KiwiFarms?

these leftist celebs are not self aware and come off as the biggest idiots in the universe.
But I encourage these type of tweets, exposes stupid people
this tweet is really insane
View attachment 559313
There's something magical about women in the entertainment industry projecting all their insecurities (lack of real education, being useless to society, just being a piece of ass, being cast aside once they're 35) onto the lives of normal women, who mostly have respectable jobs, and have for decades. If you choose a degrading brainlet career, that's on you. Maybe "retire" at 35, go to college, and get a real job if you feel shitty.

Normal people don't have these acute insecurities because they haven't lived these weird artificial lifestyles.
 
what does Bette Midler mean by "N" word and enslaved, KiwiFarms?

View attachment 559313

It would appear that her own farts are currently the wind beneath her wings (and lungs for that matter).

I find it funny that her reply was slammed in the news not for being a naive view of the world that has seen dramatic overturns in the West for the last few decades, but because the ilk she was appealing to found it offensive against a higher tier of oppression in their agenda - black women.

Which summarises this whole trial, really - Do your best to ruin the man's life with your outdated accusations, only to be sidelined by your "kin" because they only see you as a vehicle for their own malignant thoughts.
 
Last edited:
It would appear that her own farts are currently the wind beneath her wings (and lungs for that matter).

I find it funny that her reply was slammed in the news not for being a naive view of the world that has seen dramatic overturns in the West for the last few decades, but because the ilk she was appealing to found it offensive against a higher tier of oppression in their agenda - black women.

Which summarises this whole trial, really - Do your best to ruin the man's life with your outdated accusations, only to be sidelined by your "kin" because they only see you as a vehicle for their own malignant thoughts
By the logic of verbal traps the black women have her.
 
299cbcd546ebf7487d7270e8a6e5162de74cb78f639221f7fac6e2e6d5ab3222.png
 
>the implication that the FBI is on Trump's side
toplellest

When is Moore going to kneel over from a heart attack already? I've always considered him such a smug and manipulative fuckcock since I saw Bowling Before Columbine and did like 5 minutes of research into it.
 
The thing is, it's not as simple as "she's lying or she's not". Eyewitness testimony is notoriously shitty.

There's been psychological studies done about it. Researchers have been able to plant false memories in people with carefully structured interviews and prodding. These memories feel 100% real in these people's heads. They can't tell the difference. It's like Total Recall shit.

On its own, your mind will fill in gaps in shoddy memories automatically.

Something I want to note about this is the op-ed in the NYT saying traumatic memories are more reliable: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/19/opinion/kavanaugh-christine-ford-sexual-assault.html

Obviously the NYT has a huge influence, particularly over politicians and the democratic base. However, I have read in a couple of places now that the view expressed in this op-ed is at best one of the major views in a hotly contested issue and at worst rather heterodox and intentionally misleading. Here's an article arguing for that other point of view: https://quillette.com/2018/10/04/on-the-fallibility-of-memory-and-the-importance-of-evidence/

I have never read much on the reliability of memory so cannot weigh in meaningfully on which is correct, but I thought it important to note what those who read the MSM but don't dig deeper might be relying on when insisting for the veracity of Ford's memory about the most traumatic stuff.
 
Back