Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait, i haven't kept up to date with American politics, who's Brett Kavanaugh, why do people (I'm guessing liberals/leftist/democrats) hate him and anything else I'm missing?

Seriously, who is this guy?

Quoting myself from a few pages back, with a few additional bits:

He's Trump's most recent nomine to the Supreme Court.

No, really. That's it. There is no story. I can't give you a longer explanation. That's the sum total of it. They hate him. Part of it is I suppose lingering resentment over having been "robbed" of Obama getting to nominate one in his last months, but really there is no reason they hate this guy in particular. This is literally all "fill in the blank" protests - as in, there were a couple cases where press releases got out that just had something like "We condemn XXXXXX being nominated to the supreme court" still in place.

The sum total of his alleged "crimes" are a handful of accusations of sexual misconduct 30+ years ago, by witnesses who by their own admission have memory problems, and who have been discredited and disavowed by every name they put forward to corroborate their story.
 
Wait, i haven't kept up to date with American politics, who's Brett Kavanaugh, why do people (I'm guessing liberals/leftist/democrats) hate him and anything else I'm missing?

Seriously, who is this guy?

A nominee for the United States Supreme Court, basically the highest court in the country. Part of our system of checks and balance, including the executive branch (President, etc) and legislative (Congress). Their primary job is determining if laws abide by the Constitution or not and making certain interpretations of laws. He's been accused of sexual assault from around 30-40 years ago but there isn't really any evidence, it's a he said/she said argument and the accuser's claims are shaky at best.
 
View attachment 559795

The spoop king is literally shaking.

What do you expect from someone who likes to write shit involving a mom having a sexual relationship with her son and a group of 10 year olds fucking each other. Doesn't surprise me that he's acting like a special snowflake.

Just saw footage of protesters outside the White House on Britbong news. It's like watching the sjws at Democrat HQ cave in all over again. I guess Trump's salt mine is gonna be staying open for quite some time.
 
View attachment 559795

The spoop king is literally shaking.
The hyperbolic overreactions never get old.

This is the result of people uncritically believing every batshit crazy contradictory article, blog, tweet, and public tantrum created by media people and journalists. They turned a boring guy who used to drink beer into a krokadil chugging rape warlord who plans to build rape camps in memory of elliot rodger under the supervision of russian gamergate nazis....and they do this for literally EVERY fucking person who vaguely resists or contradicts a media narrative
 
View attachment 559795

The spoop king is literally shaking.
Really? This is the final straw? Orange Drumpfhitler getting elected didn't make him ashamed to be an American but a loopy feminist's incredibly questionable at best allegations not getting listen and believed unquestionably by the entire populace is what did him in?
 
I think the NRA is also a tax exempt non-profit as are most super PACs under the 501(c)(4) tax status. I believe the ACLU is the same but don't know about the LWV (seems likely it is). Under this status, the organization is tax exempt, but contributions/donations are not tax deductible. This seems about fair to me, but maybe a few 501(c)(3) orgs should be changed to 501(c)(4)
ACLU is a 501(c)(3) organization. This status bars them from supporting political candidates, but unfortunately there doesn't seem to be anything against attacking political candidates or being involved in politics in other ways.
 
saved this from /pol/ a week ago

1538111891194.jpg
 

Holy shit.... My almonds are so fuckin' activated right now.

It came out through the BetterHealth discussion that Facebook held a talk discussing agressive marketing tactics for those under emotional stress. Given that what's his face from Facebook was fine with the exec at Kavanaugh's hearing in support of Kavanaugh. Maybe companies are catering to liberals because of their fragile emotional mind. By catering, companies create a space for these people to fester and react to ongoings of the world. Then BAM!!! Hit them with marketing to get them to buy shit.

Edit: I thought about it more.
Companies like FB are catering not to the passerbys of the internet but to those who live through social media because they are more exposed to advertising and those people are young lefties who are terrified of the world. It's brilliant!!!
 
Last edited:
Quoting myself from a few pages back, with a few additional bits:

He's Trump's most recent nomine to the Supreme Court.

No, really. That's it. There is no story. I can't give you a longer explanation. That's the sum total of it. They hate him. Part of it is I suppose lingering resentment over having been "robbed" of Obama getting to nominate one in his last months, but really there is no reason they hate this guy in particular. This is literally all "fill in the blank" protests - as in, there were a couple cases where press releases got out that just had something like "We condemn XXXXXX being nominated to the supreme court" still in place.

The sum total of his alleged "crimes" are a handful of accusations of sexual misconduct 30+ years ago, by witnesses who by their own admission have memory problems, and who have been discredited and disavowed by every name they put forward to corroborate their story.

A nominee for the United States Supreme Court, basically the highest court in the country. Part of our system of checks and balance, including the executive branch (President, etc) and legislative (Congress). Their primary job is determining if laws abide by the Constitution or not and making certain interpretations of laws. He's been accused of sexual assault from around 30-40 years ago but there isn't really any evidence, it's a he said/she said argument and the accuser's claims are shaky at best.

That's it? And people are losing their shit over this?

I mean, alright then...
 
Back