Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
On what grounds do you say that Kavanaugh has a "substance abuse problem" and "poor impulse and emotional control"?
I'm not being a crybaby you fucking autist. I'm being a realist. It would be nice if other people would.
You're being a "realist" by making baseless bare assertions against Kavanaugh...

O.K.
Pretty sure I stated that. He has a substance abuse problem and has poor impulse and emotional control as demonstrated by being a fucking crybaby in his testimony.
Showing emotion at being falsely accused of rape and sexual assault, and getting slandered and libeled because of that, is not being a "crybaby".
I'm not applying for a lifetime appointment on the highest court in the country, am I?
No. But you would need greater evidence than a nebulous "substance abuse problem [read:drinking alcohol] and poor impulse and emotional control [read: getting angry sometimes when seriously provoked]" charge to disqualify someone from the Supreme Court.
 
On a more serious note, I'm glad things turned out the way they did. I disagree with Kavanaugh, but the Democrats played the absolutely worst hand and wanted him convicted without any tangible evidence.

If he had lost the confirmation it would have greenlit even more political scheming and drama where votes are blocked by finger-pointing on both sides. It would have been scummy, but I could accept it. The deal-breaker was the idea that he could be sentenced over pure hearsay without any fair trial.
 
Guilty. However, I also hate degeneracy and authoritarianism.

But mostly it is about seeing the salt, suicide threats and tears.

astute liberal.jpg
 
One Of You Should Just Leak Me The FBI Report
It’s the very least you could do.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...h-report-senators_us_5bb79bade4b01470d05146cd
View attachment 559868
We do not know what was in the FBI’s most recent background check into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The report was locked away in a secure room in the basement of the Capitol Visitor Center, where Democratic and Republican senators read it over in alternating shifts, applying or ignoring the evidence contained therein to a decision that will affect millions and millions of lives.

The only thing less democratic about the process here is basically everything else about the Supreme Court.

But we do know how this profound deficit of the old democratic spirit could be remedied: Senators, just tell me what was in the report. FBI, leak it to me.

Here’s what some Democratic senators have said about the report, which contained summaries of the FBI’s interviews and of which we American citizens are not allowed to know the actual contents.

From Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.):

“One: This was not a full and fair investigation. It was sharply limited in scope and did not explore the relevant confirming facts.

Two: The available documents do not exonerate Mr. Kavanaugh.

And three: The available documents contradict statements Mr. Kavanaugh made under oath.”

From Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) :

“It is simply impossible after seeing the results of the FBI supplemental work — and I hesitate to call it an investigation — that anybody could think that it was in any way shape or form the comprehensive investigation the president promised.”

From Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.):

“The most notable part of this report is what’s not in it.”

And here’s what the Republicans said about the report.

From Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.):

“What we know for sure is the FBI report did not corroborate any of the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.”

From Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.):

“We’ve seen no additional corroborating information.”

There’s no actual way of knowing who’s telling the truth. Democrats will assume Democrats are telling the truth; Republicans will assume the same of other Republicans. The dozen centrists in the country will believe The New York Times opinion section.

Meanwhile, a president whom the majority of the country did not vote for is installing a justice on a Supreme Court that already had a seat hijacked and stolen by Senate Republicans, who were only ever in a position to do so because of decades of gerrymandering and voter suppression.

This is not how a healthy democracy functions. But there is a way to start to correct these profound injustices: What if you just told me what was in the FBI report? You’ll all feel much better! I know I will.

So, are you a senator? An FBI employee who helped with the investigation? Do you want to do me and the country — nay, democracy itself — a solid? Email ashley.feinberg@huffpost.com. It’s the least you could do.

Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? Here’s how.
http://archive.is/F7J5D
"Hey you should give me confidential data because I'm special Our Democracy™ needs it."

How about fuck you and fuck no.
 
I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land.
And I'm sure you can make a case for this by actually talking about his judicial record, after all he's already sat on a federal circuit court for over a decade. And hopefully not just repeating low-tier Democrat talking points like

This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
Oh.
 
Showing emotion at being falsely accused of rape and sexual assault, and getting slandered and libeled because of that, is not being a "crybaby".

One thing that gets lost in the shitstorm that is this nomination process is how Kavanaugh's family was affected by it. I have little doubt that it has caused his wife and children much duress, which I imagine is what angered him even more than the allegations themselves.
 
I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
Your dick is weaker and smaller.
 
ACLU is a 501(c)(3) organization. This status bars them from supporting political candidates, but unfortunately there doesn't seem to be anything against attacking political candidates or being involved in politics in other ways.
Per Wikipedia (bad source I know)
Legally, the ACLU consists of two separate but closely affiliated nonprofit organizations: the American Civil Liberties Union, a 501(c)(4) social welfare group, and the ACLU Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public charity. Both organizations engage in civil rights litigation, advocacy, and education, but only donations to the 501(c)(3) foundation are tax deductible, and only the 501(c)(4) group can engage in unlimited political lobbying.[10][11] The two organizations share office space and employees.[12]
They should probably clip the 501(c)(3) status out and just make it operate exclusively as a 501(c)(4) or spin one or the other off as an entirely separate org

I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
Serious question, Have you been molested or sexually assaulted, and did the chads bully you in highschool and college?
 
I fucking love it when shit gets so salty that the salt spills over and directly into the place that is guaranteed to laugh at you. That's how you know you're getting top shelf.

I know, right? I should buy up all the water at my super market and sell it at a premium, cuz the hurricane of salt will leave so many people parched!
 

I think my favorite part of this whole despicable shitshow they put Brett through is how for once, for fucking once, the Democrats utterly failed after pulling their point-and-shriek shaming tactics. For fucking once the GOP grew a spine and stood firm on something. I'm hoping it continues, but :optimistic:

That’s the funny thing about standing up and punching back the Bully. Once you do it once, once you realize the Bully isn’t invincible, that the Bully in fact commands no power, it becomes remarkably easy to do it again. The GOP Leadership just discovered the greatest lesson of Trump. The REEEEing of the outraged left are just wind. It blows away in a moment, and has no power over you. Turn to face it and stand firm.

Chuck Schumer May need to be medicated tonight. This is his worst nightmare. His doomsday scenario. GOP polling is going up, for telling him to fuck off! For telling him to fuck off while he shrieked RAPE! And sent hordes of Dangerhairs at them.
 
Indeed, if it were I who was having newspapers just casually suggesting that I was molesting my children because at worst I coped a feel 30 years ago I know I would just smile and not get angry.

Anyway, this vote may end up being the most watch-worthy vote in Senate history. I refuse to believe that someone like Kamala Harris isn't going to try some "last minute heroics" that will be utterly embarrassing.
 
Back