Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doxg_7-XsAAO6BG.jpg


Oh my god this day cant stop getting better
 
Can't wait for his next novel with the Kavanaugh Rape Monster analogue.
It will be a follow up to Sleeping Beauties, a book about regular women against feminists nonconformist wamen.

Clint interviews Eve, learning that she is an "emissary" sent by an otherworldly being who believes that women are capable of building a society free of war, abuse, and other evils she says are caused primarily by men.
 
Democrats and thinking.

View attachment 559788
Its the "impeach trump, get Mike "LGBTQ BBQ" Pence" principle. Anything beyond immidiate "WE MUST MAKE GRONALD GRRUMPFFFKKKFFF ANGRY!" is utterly beyond these cretins since they just assume that making big scary "U AM BIGUT!" noises will make their opposition back down, and thus they will dedicate 1000% of their time and effort into pointless horseshit that at best if successful will annoy trump and the republicans for a brief time while doing nothing to actually defeat them, and at worst if successful will make shit soooo much worse for the dems in the long term.

For example, they now have a supreme court justice who is probably just itching to do everything in his power to make these fucktards scream and cry and beg and whimper for the next 40 goddamn years. If they had done literally nothing they would simply have another fairly conservative guy taking the place of a very slightly less conservative guy.

And THATS before we get to how bad this is going to impact the "blue wave" this november

I would tend to agree with that. People these days would be hard pressed to find a Democrat who understands how to get something besides screeching done--and that's why the Democrats are in the situation that they are in. Most Democrats--particularly those who need this understanding the most, like the leadership--have no real tactical or strategic vision for how to accomplish things. Pelosi and Schumer are no match for McConnell, who has shown a great talent for outfoxing the Democrats--notably so under Obama's tenure. I don't agree with McConnell's ideas or thinking, but I respect his wit--he is not to be underestimated.

The "Impeach Trump! so we can have Pence" push does underscore just how little thought goes into most Democratic plans. They think out the first step then wade through the rest like a tourist without a map, predictably ending in failure.

I don't think you're wrong, but that's not how they saw it. Until fairly recently, the mantra was very much "The repubs are screwed come November".

Hubris has been something the Democrats have really embraced in the past few years; yet, despite blatant reality checks like that of November 8th, 2016, they still appear to believe their inertia is unmatched.

From what I've seen, the "blue wave" has been overestimated from the beginning. I would charitably say the Democrats are "doing well" if they even hold on to what they have.

---------

Speaking personally, I can say this: though I am a liberal, I have no issue with Kavanaugh in particular. I figured on someone like him being Kennedy's successor months ago anyway. Even if it weren't Kavanaugh, it'd be someone like him and that's what you'd reasonably expect--traditionally, a president will nominate like-minded people to positions of power.

I also understand that all the Supreme Court was a relevant election issue to the 2016 election, with Scalia's seat having been open and others' (such as Kennedy's) being up to be reasonably assumed as "soon to be open." With all that in mind and on the line, Hillary lost and she lost hard.

To use a quote from my post regarding Kennedy's retirement and its implications:

[The Democrats] made their shitty judgment in backing a loser (Hillary), deserve the rebuke and now they need to accept the consequences.

If Democrats want to blame anyone for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, they can blame Hillary and those among them who pushed for her.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to the no-win situation, Dems. You block Kavanaugh, angry Republicans vote you out in the midterms. You fail to block him, angry dangerhair soyboy Dems vote you out for failing to subvert democracy, or vote in nuttier people who promise to subvert the system and it makes your party completely untenable come 2020.... there is no winning move left on the board.
 
I would tend to agree with that. People these days would be hard pressed to find a Democrat who understands how to get something besides screeching done--and that's why the Democrats are in the situation that they are in. Most Democrats--particularly those who need this understanding the most, like the leadership--have no real tactical or strategic vision for how to accomplish things. Pelosi and Schumer are no match for McConnell, who has shown a great talent for outfoxing the Democrats--notably so under Obama's tenure. I don't agree with McConnell's ideas or thinking, but I respect his wit--he is not to be underestimated.

The "Impeach Trump! so we can have Pence" push does underscore just how little thought goes into most Democratic plans. They think out the first step then wade through the rest like a tourist without a map, predictably ending in failure.



Hubris has been something the Democrats have really embraced in the past few years; yet, despite blatant reality checks like that of November 8th, 2016, they still appear to believe their inertia is unmatched.

From what I've seen, the "blue wave" has been overestimated from the beginning. I would charitably say the Democrats are "doing well" if they even hold on to what they have.

---------

Speaking personally, I can say this: though I am a liberal, I have no issue with Kavanaugh in particular. I figured on someone like him being Kennedy's successor months ago anyway. Even if it weren't Kavanaugh, it'd be someone like him and that's what you'd reasonably expect--traditionally, a president will nominate like-minded people to positions of power.

I also understand that all the Supreme Court was a relevant election issue to the 2016 election, with Scalia's seat having been open and others' (such as Kennedy's) being up to be reasonably assumed as "soon to be open." With all that in mind and on the line, Hillary lost and she lost hard.

To use a quote from my post regarding Kennedy's retirement and its implications:



If Democrats want to blame anyone for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, they can blame Hillary and those among them who pushed for her.
Over 5 years on, and this ancient mayme video continues to sum up my entire opinion of the left and the democrats in a way that can never be surpassed
 


Doxg_7-XsAAO6BG.jpg

Doxg_7-XsAAO6BG.jpg

Oh my god this day cant stop getting better

I'm always amazed at how well framed pictures like that are. Professional quality framing is unironically a key ingredient in the secret sauce for making a meme.

Welcome to the no-win situation, Dems. You block Kavanaugh, angry Republicans vote you out in the midterms. You fail to block him, angry dangerhair soyboy Dems vote you out for failing to subvert democracy, or vote in nuttier people who promise to subvert the system and it makes your party completely untenable come 2020.... there is no winning move left on the board.

I think my favorite part of this whole despicable shitshow they put Brett through is how for once, for fucking once, the Democrats utterly failed after pulling their point-and-shriek shaming tactics. For fucking once the GOP grew a spine and stood firm on something. I'm hoping it continues, but :optimistic:
 
Collins vote for Yes is confirmed.

EDIT: (And democrat Manchin breaks rank and will vote yes too). Kavanaugh will be confirmed!

MANCHIN is a name only given to real men so of course the only democrat with a testosterone level in the positives saw the light
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regret
I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
 
I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
Jesus Christ, no one cares.
 
I'm not a Democrat by any means, but I will say this, Kavanaugh does NOT have the temperament to be on the highest court in the land. I don't give a shit if you want to feel superior to lefties or who is to blame or whatever bullshit. He's not right for the role. Period. It's not just lefties who will be hurt by this just like it won't be just lefties hurt by the tax bill and loss of the ACA when that inevitably comes. I like to think of what is good for ALL of us in this country and not a tribal, win/lose bullshit scenario because right now, we're all fucking losing whether you realize it or not. I'll take all my negative bullshit ratings, but this is the fucking truth. This is a frat bro with a substance abuse problem and poor impulse and emotional control. That is not someone you want on a lifetime appointment deciding precedent for the next 30-40 years. I don't care if you want to stick it to lefties or feminists or what the fuck ever, I really don't care what your position is, but ultimately, this foolishness is making us all weaker and smaller.
Okay there Mr. Teetotaler. It’s good to know that you believe that noone grows or changes from their 17 year old self. I also hope that someday, 20-30 years from now some post of yours from this site costs you a job and destroys your reputation. After all, at least that would have evidence.
 
Back