Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought this was mocking the guy he was quote tweeting originally, but I don't think it is anymore. At least his twitter fans are calling him stupid for it. Feeling pretty smug in my realizing he was a controlled op quack early on though (not that lots of people didn't)

He didn't clean his room and now his minds a mess.

Jesus Christ these people. They're so utterly manipulated into this frenzy by the progressives it makes them physically ill. Well it's either Kavanaugh making them shake or their anemic muscles from their all soy diet but still.

Kav could get denied and they would still get pissed. Complaining on the internet is all they have, they have been doing it for so long they can't just go outside and enjoy themselves.
 
If beer and dude behavior is rape are tailgate parties game rape?

:thinking:

Man, don't joke about it. That's actually where we're heading. I think in some circles we're already there.

I think it’s more an indication of how bad the lefts finances have become. I mean Soros used to at least hand out sandwiches...

It's probably hard to coordinate sandwiches when half of your protesters won't even eat cheese, much less anything else normal, and the other half won't be satisfied with a lettuce with olive oil sandwich.

I thought this was mocking the guy he was quote tweeting originally, but I don't think it is anymore. At least his twitter fans are calling him stupid for it. Feeling pretty smug in my realizing he was a controlled op quack early on though (not that lots of people didn't)

There's a second tweet where he kinda walks back on his statement and explains a little about why he thinks it.

I still think he's wrong, but at least he's trying to engage, a little bit.

I still think Peterson is a net positive in the world, regardless of why or his actual motivation, which I won't claim to know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Capture 1.PNG
I can believe the part about him trying to stalk them at least. Not necessarily what he claims happens when he finds where they're sleeping, though.
 
View attachment 560610
I think it's more pathetic they're doing it for free tbh

View attachment 560611
:story:
Man I miss my college friends. I wish I was crushing beers on a balcony yelling "K is for Kavanaugh" at passers by right now.

Since they know better than Kavanaugh if he ever had so much to drink that he blacked out, and Ford managed to get someone to testify that she told him in 2016 that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her

See hearsay and gut feelings are now evidence
It isn't even that. She allegedly told him she was sexually assaulted in 2016 and then revised it to Kavanaugh as he was being appointed. The headline was a flat out lie.
 
Who is this old faggot whining about Kavanaugh's supposed "dishonesty under oath"?

People think he lied about how drunk he got as a teen because former classmates are like "lol actually he did get pretty drunk a few times" - which I think he was fairly honest about?

He probably downplayed it a little because he's a dad, bad enough his kids have to hear this bull about one of their parents, let alone having to talk about the things in his teens which maybe were not "best behaviour" - parents normally save that on a need to know basis.
 
People think he lied about how drunk he got as a teen because former classmates are like "lol actually he did get pretty drunk a few times" - which I think he was fairly honest about?

He probably downplayed it a little because he's a dad, bad enough his kids have to hear this bull about one of their parents, let alone having to talk about the things in his teens which maybe were not "best behaviour" - parents normally save that on a need to know basis.

Actually he admitted to drinking too much in high school

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...naugh-committing-high-school-sex-assault.html

He did admit to being at boozy parties in high school, but not to any sexual assault.

'Yes there were parties. And the drinking age was 18, and yes the seniors were legal and had beer there and yes people might have had too many beers on occasion … I think all of us have probably done things we'd look back on in high school and regret or cringe about - but that's not what we're talking about,' Kavanaugh said.
 
Vermont senator says he voted for more Republican nominees than the other Republicans, but did he vote for Clarence Thomas?
:thinking:
He wasn't around for that, Vermont had two R senators at the time. Interestingly enough though, Jim Jeffords, the other senator from Vermanot also voted against him and he was basically one of the original RINOs almost throughout his entire career until he finally switched parties in 2001 to the surprise of absolutely no one.

EDIT: He was there and he did indeed vote against Thomas.
 
Last edited:
Now this other Dem senator is blubbering about how Kavanaugh will destroy Obamacare and end healthcare for the less fortunate.
 
He wasn't around for that, Vermont had two R senators at the time. Interestingly enough though, Jim Jeffords did vote against him and he was basically one of the original RINOs almost throughout his entire career until he finally switched parties in 2001 to the surprise of absolutely no one.

I looked up Leahy's judicial branch votes, and Thomas isn't listed, so alright--although he's been a senator since the 70s, and there's some votes from 1991 on his list. So where was he at that time? If he had been around then, would he have voted him in? I've noticed that despite his claim to have voted for more Republican nominees than other Republicans, I do see quite a lot of "nays" for Republicans. He must be banking on people having the memory of a goldfish or having no way to Google up his votes.
 
I looked up Leahy's judicial branch votes, and Thomas isn't listed, so alright--although he's been a senator since the 70s, and there's some votes from 1991 on his list. So where was he at that time? If he had been around then, would he have voted him in? I've noticed that despite his claim to have voted for more Republican nominees than other Republicans, I do see quite a lot of "nays" for Republicans. He must be banking on people having the memory of a goldfish or having no way to Google up his votes.
Looks like I misread it, but he indeed did vote nay against Thomas so he's still full of shit.
 
Actually he admitted to drinking too much in high school

Oh he admitted to drinking his fair share - we're talking about a guy with the balls to say "I LIKE BEER" at a hearing.

He did admit to drinking too much sometimes, but people act like he still lied about *how* far the excess went. Heck was honest about a drunk disagreement that probably shouldn't of mattered 30 years later and was civil enough to not drag the specifics out in public even when the vultures wanted to pick at it.

But then this is the issue now - and is ironic when places like the EU and UK want "right to forget" laws in place so people under 18 can clear their online histories, but then we see cases like this where people who would champion these laws also judging people on the way they acted in their teens, which should be a time when you naturally want to be a little wild and rebellious.

That and the idea that if your wrongfully accused, then you should take it tail between the legs rather than daring to stand your ground in any shape or form. We've seen many times what happens to those who throw themselves down to grovel for forgiveness, that doesn't happen, you just get a conditional pass till the next infraction comes.
 
Back