Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DQm1Yts.png

It really is like 2016 again. This is fucking hilarious.
 
That is truly a beautiful picture. You can see that weary but untarnished joy on the faces of his wife and daughters, Liza especially. She looks so proud of her father. I know that feeling.

I for one am breathing easy tonight. We're not always just or fair in the US, but at least in this case, we are not, in the end, a country that puts rumor and hysteria above facts and the law. That's something to be grateful for.

The sad part is the thousands and thousands of "progressives" looking at that picture on their laptops and phones right now and hoping, sincerely hoping, something BAD happens to those two little girls because they "deserve it" and "need to know how it feels" for being related to a person whose politics they disagree with.... but they're not the bigots of the world.... oh no...... they're the moral ones!

Somewhere out there, right now, in some darkened bedroom corner, or distant campus library table, there is a "person" sneering at that picture and thinking, "I HOPE they get RAPED" because deep down inside, that's social justice, ladies and gentlemen.

Death to your personal "infidels" dressed up as virtue....

Don't ever forget that.
 

If someone honestly thinks the family pet is worked up over politics, it may be time to log off social media and seek professional help (from anyone but a Tumblrina or other self-diagnosing resource).

Loving the current argument of "we treated him like complete shit and set out to ruin his life, how can you expect him to be fair to us?"

Someone should have thought abut that before or during their ongoing witch hunt that proved to be the most epic of epic failures.

Though not to concern troll or anything but wouldn't Kavanaugh being confirmed give Dems more motivation to vote, and some independents who don't want a majority [insert political ideology here] court?

Prior to the confirmation hearings, Dems appeared to be pulling out all the stops to attract voters this midterm in the form of more female/minority candidates, feelgood or SJW-friendly petition initiatives, etc. Further, some of the same pollsters that predicted a Clinton win two years ago showed the democratic candidates and proposals holding the lead.

The baseless accusations against Kavanaugh, however, galvanized both the Republican Party and the silent undecided, independent, and moderate voters. The idea that one has to somehow prove a negative and defend one's self against an unsubstantiated accusation from decades ago is a scary proposition - and it could very well steer a number of voters in this group towards the Republicans simply as a way of saying, "We've had enough of listen and believe."

How it all shakes out in truly-contested elections remains to be seen, though, and won't be known until the votes are tallied on Election Day.

Chelsea just doesn’t have the charisma, or the intelligence to manage blackmail, to keep the donors shoveling cash at her.

Tying in with the later comment that other Dems consider Chelsea poison, I'd speculate it's because she appears to come off nicer than her parents and isn't constantly scREEching like many other Democrats in her age group. I'm also sure the fact she spoke out against people making fun of Baron Trump on social media doesn't sit well with Democrats, either.

It would be interesting if Amy Barret is nominated next. Rape would be difficult, maybe being a pedo? Accusing her of being a lesbian could boomerang back at them. Hmmm, what else can be flung at a woman.

Given the troon mantra that "Trans women are women," I could see her being being questioned on her support for woman's rights - including reproductive - and identity politics to somehow imply she somehow won't stand up for other women whether natal or trans. In short, I think they will try to discredit her on the basis of her gender and party affiliation and claim she's a mindless pawn who will do whatever the "good ol' boys" want.
 
I could care less about a senator or whatever the hell is happening but honestly, if there's no solid evidence that is decisive, then that's that. From what I heard people were changing their stories and what not for whatever reason. I love living in a world where people will take so much shit seriously.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Rumpled Foreskin
The sad part is the thousands and thousands of "progressives" looking at that picture on their laptops and phones right now and hoping, sincerely hoping, something BAD happens to those two little girls because they "deserve it" and "need to know how it feels" for being related to a person whose politics they disagree with.... but they're not the bigots of the world.... oh no...... they're the moral ones!

Somewhere out there, right now, in some darkened bedroom corner, or distant campus library table, there is a "person" sneering at that picture and thinking, "I HOPE they get RAPED" because deep down inside, that's social justice, ladies and gentlemen.

Death to your personal "infidels" dressed up as virtue....

Don't ever forget that.
Fuck I just had the thought that some male feminist might actually try to do something to those little girls just because their father didn't let the left burn him at the stake.

Worst part is I can't convince myself that it couldn't happen.
 
It would be interesting if Amy Barret is nominated next. Rape would be difficult, maybe being a pedo? Accusing her of being a lesbian could boomerang back at them. Hmmm, what else can be flung at a woman. I mean sure they’ll insult her looks and intelligence as a given, but sex crimes is a bit difficult.
They will absolutely accuse her of being a white power collaborator and of calling someone a nigger. Then they will call her nigger kids props. There is no winning with these people.

Dude, it's the daily show. It's been exceptional for years.
By for years I hope you mean always, but at least it was funny with Leibowitz.

Apparently JBP was talking tactics. (but then he's on tour it seems so we can hardly expect him to be informed about the news right now)
View attachment 561017
View attachment 561021
View attachment 561022
View attachment 561023
View attachment 561025
View attachment 561026
He is just walking it back because his fans BTFO him in the comments. I still don't know how he is this wrong though. Kavanaugh stepping down would be taken as an admission of guilt and the left would have a huge party about it and use the tactics even more. I've always said he is controlled opposition and I'm sticking to it. You do know he used to write globalist strategy papers for the UN as part of a Podesta group right? You do know he removed Faith Goldy from a "free speech" conference right? I could go on.

Not to mention the time and millions of dollars wasted on this mess only to have to go through it all again

Not to mention, fuck the left. This is a win we are keeping. We aren't just gonna roll over and let the left win to be nice. Controlled opposition
 
I'm still 50 pages behind, but I have a question that probably doesn't matter at this point.

One of the things that the Dems MIGHT be right about is Kav understating his college drinking. Now I don't give a damn that he drank too much during college, but IF it could be firmly established that he gave Congress an inaccurate picture of how much he drank, is this something that could possibly bite him in the ass later?
 
Back