Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please, these are the same groups of the hyper left wing that are tankies "well sure 100 million dead but look at this mean tweet"

The only thing that will happen just like we say under GET was normies got pushed out of the same group that said it was for them and the blue collar.

Neither Neil or Brett are die hards, and both on record saying eh lets let sleeping dogs lie in Roe V Wade. This sham was such that I can't see anyone not laughing it off who's somewhat functional. This was the hard core left throwing a smear because they didn't get to pick, again. The biggest problem with Niel was he said he was not going to be an activist judge.. for either side.

They lost their shit at a man who said "I'm going to do my job" So the fact someone else pulled that horrid card of being honest, not what these people want, they put him to the burner and thank god it was so fumbled they couldn't stop him.
I think the end goal of showing leftie hate and violence on TV isnt to make people vote republican, it's to make people too horrified to vote democrat
 
I'm more disappointed that far more people recognized the smears against Thomas for what they were back then, when Ford's accusations have even less of a basis in reality. But that might just point to how strong the media campaign against him was this time.

I think with most people the thing that really made them sit up and go WTF with this was "High School"!?!?! There is an unspoken rule with most folks. what happened in High School stays in High School. If no Felony charges were brought themn, and no dead bodies found now, it never happened. Even if it happened, it never happened. We all have skeletons in our closet. And that closet is called "High School". Everyone understands this. The fact that the Senate Dem's attempted to weaponize something from his High School days 36 years prior really brought out the empathy in people.
 
It's sad how many people can accuse someone of being subhuman and committing a heinous act against humanity...but when they don't get their way, what happens? They go after them, the party they're behind and all of their supporters wishing all kinds of heinous acts against humanity upon them without even a hint of self-awareness. Doesn't matter if you're just a regular-day worker with a family and kids who wouldn't hurt a fly; they want you on the pike Vlad the Impaler style.

Reactions like these are exactly why I hold the Left in a view no more positively than the Right nowadays.
 
I think the end goal of showing leftie hate and violence on TV isnt to make people vote republican, it's to make people too horrified to vote democrat
Either way it seems to be working, mid terms normally have poor turn out, I can't wait for no matter what that to happen again and watch these chuckle fucks need a new boogey man when they can't even go out and vote themselves.
 
Either way it seems to be working, mid terms normally have poor turn out, I can't wait for no matter what that to happen again and watch these chuckle fucks need a new boogey man when they can't even go out and vote themselves.
I wanna see the outrage. I recently moved away from a blue state because of the riots these people regularly cause so I have a vested interest in seeing them crash. It's making these places unsafe to live in.
 
Hmmm wouldn't the Colbert Shows advertisers be interested in that? Someone should ask them about that... very very publicly. Maybe lots of someones. I mean normally I am not all about "ruining someones life" but in this case I might just make an exception.

Dunno, helping the show by getting rid of a dogshit writer seems like a bad idea.
 
I just can't get over this one, sorry guys.

"UK please bomb the shit out of all our biggest cities then sell half of us to Russia. To save our soul."

Democrats in charge of understanding history.

Eh, if I was a Europoor I'd probably support the US annexing my country at this point, because the alternative is worse. Which is probably treason.
 
Eh, if I was a Europoor I'd probably support the US annexing my country at this point, because the alternative is worse. Which is probably treason.
I don't want us to annex any countries. All it's gonna do it make us as weak as them once they start voting. I'd support taking Poland, but that's it. Poland is our greatest ally
 
I don't want us to annex any countries. All it's gonna do it make us as weak as them once they start voting. I'd support taking Poland, but that's it. Poland is our greatest ally

I read in the 70's before the UK joined the EEC there were serious proposals for it joining the US as a state.
 
6dot.jpg


"Why won't they believe us?"
 
Disclaimer: not bait, have a point.

View attachment 561738

When you look at the meat grinder Kavanaugh went through.....it’s amazing his popularity isn’t lower. Considering everything thrown at him.

If you want my analysis, people are starting to see past the veil of MSM smears.

It warms the cockles of my heart that Clarence Thomas has a higher approval rating than Ginsberg (even though his opposing rating's higher due to his name continuously being dragged in the mud). Give or take a few points, that is where Kavanaugh will be in 20+ years as well.
 
Either way it seems to be working, mid terms normally have poor turn out, I can't wait for no matter what that to happen again and watch these chuckle fucks need a new boogey man when they can't even go out and vote themselves.

Sadly - and quite unsurprisingly - this won't happen. The Boogeyman will just grow. These libtards will declare everyone a Trump-Nazi-Goon if he doesn't join the Democrat-lockstep and pray down all their eternal mantras immediately.
All they do is force people into a "You're either with us, or you're with the terrorists alt-right." position and then wonder why the supposed liberals fail to attract a crowd with their oppressive, restrictive cult-of-personality.
 
Eh, if I was a Europoor I'd probably support the US annexing my country at this point, because the alternative is worse. Which is probably treason.

I don't want us to annex any countries. All it's gonna do it make us as weak as them once they start voting. I'd support taking Poland, but that's it. Poland is our greatest ally

Yeah, no. I'd rather my country be annexed by Russia or we create our own south/east European conglomerate with our neighbours than go from one supergovernment owned by the blues to another. You boys have enough on your plate as it is, and so do the people in the non-cucked parts of Europe.

If you wanna annex anything, annex Quebec, that would be a boon for the US.
 
Either way it seems to be working, mid terms normally have poor turn out, I can't wait for no matter what that to happen again and watch these chuckle fucks need a new boogey man when they can't even go out and vote themselves.

A fun game to play. Look at any footage of the DC Protesters about Kavanaugh, and just try to imagine any of them ever actually voting? Ask yourself if any of them know where a polling place is, or when election day is? If they have ever lived in one place long enough to actually have their current address match their voter registration. (State Prison does not count!)
 
A fun game to play. Look at any footage of the DC Protesters about Kavanaugh, and just try to imagine any of them ever actually voting? Ask yourself if any of them know where a polling place is, or when election day is? If they have ever lived in one place long enough to actually have their current address match their voter registration. (State Prison does not count!)
They might be getting paid to vote too.
 
I just can't get over this one, sorry guys.

"UK please bomb the shit out of all our biggest cities then sell half of us to Russia. To save our soul."

Democrats in charge of understanding history.

Not to mention in charge of understanding geography. Nobody is equipped to invade the U.S. openly. There's this thing called "ocean" which means your options for large-scale troop movement are limited to "use boats". Which would be fun for our submarines, no doubt, if anyone had a large enough navy to move that many people, which they don't. (The only nation that comes anywhere near close to that kind of capacity is Russia, ironically.)

We're too big as well, in terms of both square mileage and population distribution, so they could never hit enough places quickly enough to make us do more then blink before backhanding their asses into low Earth orbit (courtesy of the Second Amendment thank you), and then using our own military to go over and return the favor of the visit.

Though, it would be amusing to see these quislings playing house nigger to a doomed-to-fail invading force...then crying about how unfaiiiir as the five-minutes' war ends with the biggest necktie party in history.
 
Back