Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the Libertarian party wasn't so exceptional they could have actually made real gains against the Republicans and Democrats.
They did actually. Le flumpf man and yaaaas qween slay were bad enough that the libertarians tripled their record high for voter count, and managed to pull out 3.3%. The greens also captured 1.1%, which was their second to best year, next to Ralph Nader pocketing 2.7% in 2000.

The fact that one in 23 people voted third party during a presidential election year was one of the more interesting takeaways that was lost in all the post election hysteria.
 
I think the LP got scared the left calls anyone not them a nazi so panders to SJW shit but keeps the freedom or sold it self socially left.

Hoppe would be ashamed. The LP could just have not been retarded and hit the magic 5% easy but gave into fear and knee jerk reactions vs standing by principles, out of all the parties fair exchange and NAP need to show that the most while traditional dem or Republicans can and do shift with the winds.
 
bmmol1.png

http://archive.is/OUenb
 
I think the LP got scared the left calls anyone not them a nazi so panders to SJW shit but keeps the freedom or sold it self socially left.

Hoppe would be ashamed. The LP could just have not been exceptional and hit the magic 5% easy but gave into fear and knee jerk reactions vs standing by principles, out of all the parties fair exchange and NAP need to show that the most while traditional dem or Republicans can and do shift with the winds.

Libertarians are just gib me dats except they're trust fund assholes instead of welfare collecting ghetto assholes.
 
They did actually. Le flumpf man and yaaaas qween slay were bad enough that the libertarians tripled their record high for voter count, and managed to pull out 3.3%. The greens also captured 1.1%, which was their second to best year, next to Ralph Nader pocketing 2.7% in 2000.

The fact that one in 23 people voted third party during a presidential election year was one of the more interesting takeaways that was lost in all the post election hysteria.

I blame legalized weed preventing the voters from giving a fuck what box they click in certain states.
 
Libertarians are just gib me dats except they're trust fund assholes instead of welfare collecting ghetto assholes.
Maybe they should hire an armstrong/smt chaos reason type guy to run, atleast they would be actual dont step on snake reeeee guys instead of a bunch of free gibs leftists
 
Time to change the subtitle I think.

Also, laugh as Kavanaugh does nothing towards Roe v Wade.

Roe v Wade will not be repealed. There is nothing in the ruling to dispute as I recall.

What you might see is increased regulation, or more specifically state restrictions on abortion clinics like in Texas and Indiana, being upheld as lawful.
 
If the Libertarian party wasn't so exceptional they could have actually made real gains against the Republicans and Democrats.
If the party wasn't run by lolcows in training, I'd have probably voted for them more often; hell possibly even register as one given that I'm pretty much a left-lib. As it stands I'm still impressed how close they actually came to crossing the extra funding barrier (5%) in spite of being run by speds. It's not the debate barrier, but still... for a group obsessed with fucking up it's quite impressive they did so well.
 
If the party wasn't run by lolcows in training, I'd have probably voted for them more often; hell possibly even register as one given that I'm pretty much a left-lib. As it stands I'm still impressed how close they actually came to crossing the extra funding barrier (5%) in spite of being run by speds. It's not the debate barrier, but still... for a group obsessed with fucking up it's quite impressive they did so well.

Gary Johnson is so exceptional that even if your values are libertarian you're an idiot for voting for him. He's no Ron Paul.

 
Roe v Wade will not be repealed.

Give it about 10 years. The Democrats are preforming so poorly that the US will be a one party state, even though the Greens and Libertarian are still a thing some how. Democrats will continue to lose seats in every possible political position from senator to city treasurer. When the country is pulled enough to the right on a normie level you'll see a lot of Supreme Court decisions reopened and reevaluated. Roe V Wade, gay marriage will be apart of a great judicial purge. Just give it time.
 
Yea, that article is exceptional as all hell.

There might be some truth in the lose a 'battle but win the war' though. Having Kavanaugh go through will probably help democrats stoke the outrage of their hardcores and get people out to vote in the midterms.

There's at least three problems with that calculation though:
- Getting a good election result in the Senate and/or the House is small compensation compared to nominating a justice to the supreme court. House/Senate majorities can shift every second years, a young justice can stay for 30-40
- The more the democrat hardcore base is activated, the more they act like violent apes, so the republican base gets activated too.
- The more the democrat hardcore base is activated, the more they act like violent apes, so they scare away moderate democrats from voting Democrat and drives undecided normies into the arms of the Republicans.

The thing is, all the moderate dems and single-issue dems left the party a while ago, followed by the southern dems and oldschoolers. 2016 drove away both any remaining classic Liberals and the not-completely-insane Progressives (there were a few), and this basically chased off anyone remotely sane who was left. Even the ones that hated Kavanaugh and found him abhorrent didn't want to burn fucking due process to the ground in the process, and I saw even a smattering of die-hard Social Justice advocates stop for a moment and go: "You know what? This is a shit show. I want no part of this," meaning this fuck-up was hard enough to defeat Autism for several minutes and allow rational thought in.

The blue wave is dead, and the establishment Democrats have killed it.
 
Give it about 10 years. The Democrats are preforming so poorly that the US will be a one party state, even though the Greens and Libertarian are still a thing some how. Democrats will continue to lose seats in every possible political position from senator to city treasurer. When the country is pulled enough to the right on a normie level you'll see a lot of Supreme Court decisions reopened and reevaluated. Roe V Wade, gay marriage will be apart of a great judicial purge. Just give it time.

I could be fun to imagine various cities who voted Democrat for years like Chicago turning Republican which result a wave of "Reeeee". ;-)
 
Give it about 10 years. The Democrats are preforming so poorly that the US will be a one party state, even though the Greens and Libertarian are still a thing some how. Democrats will continue to lose seats in every possible political position from senator to city treasurer. When the country is pulled enough to the right on a normie level you'll see a lot of Supreme Court decisions reopened and reevaluated. Roe V Wade, gay marriage will be apart of a great judicial purge. Just give it time.

By that logic, Brown V Board should have been overturned with the rise of Reaganism, after all, disenfranchising blacks is what all conservatives want deep down inside.... but it didn't happen, it wasn't even tried. It's incredibly HARD to get the USSC to re-visit anything, and doubly-hard to make them overturn it. You can count on about three fingers on one hand the number of times that has happened. The body is slow to act, by design and by nature, for this very reason, so that even radical swings in public sentiment doesn't rewrite the law book every 20 years....

Overturning Roe V Wade is a liberal boogeyman right up there with God striking down the nation if it ever let gays married was a Right wing one. It's based on a false premise that every, single member of political group "X" wants to see a very radical idea passed above all else.

You could say Roe V Wade was the origin of ID politics in that regard, that somehow, being conservative in any way meant you wanted it utterly destroyed, and that being liberal meant you'd rather stand on a mountain of fetuses than say "Well, it's not for everyone..."

R v W is safe, the panickers are only making themselves look silly and ignorant of civics and history, which isn't unusual in the fee fee era where the mountain of evidence it won't happen can be disregarded because "I get anxious at night".
 
Back