Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh this is hilarious. On Day 1 Kavanaugh hires more Black law clerks than Ginsberg has in her career, and he hires a full female staff of clerks. The first to do so. Somebody is sending a number of messages.[/QUOTE
I found this on the Washington Post (democracy dies in poopments).
upload_2018-10-8_14-31-56.png

It's beautiful how they'll never be happy regardless.​
 
Last edited:
I think they believed if they repeated the Blue Wave lie enough that it would become truth. After all, they only 'care' about their metro areas and appearing 'woke'.

I think they were banking on the usually mid term gains by the opposite party to the president, building up this narrative of the wokening, then posing as glorious heroes rising to the challenge after gaining a few seats, maybe the House.

Now, I'd love there to be a bloodbath. I'd probably lean left, but I want the Democratic party to seriously suffer and have to tear down the liches in charge, rather than being essentially the party of GWB they lamented over for 8 years.
 
I think they were banking on the usually mid term gains by the opposite party to the president, building up this narrative of the wokening, then posing as glorious heroes rising to the challenge after gaining a few seats, maybe the House.

Now, I'd love there to be a bloodbath. I'd probably lean left, but I want the Democratic party to seriously suffer and have to tear down the liches in charge, rather than being essentially the party of GWB they lamented over for 8 years.
Yeah but when they tear down the heads of the party will they be replaced with more Ocasio-Cortez, Hirono, Harris, and Booker types or Manchin and Doug Jones types? It all depends on the lessons they learn and the direction the party takes. Judging by everything we have seen since Trump including the Kavanaugh debacle, the Democrats will pick the former and continue to go nuts. It's no party for white men unfortunately
 
The thing about Roe v. Wade is that the judicial reasoning is incredibly shaky and the case law it is based on is utter garbage. They made up a right to intimate privacy in your own home and reasoned that you had it because it would be hard to enforce. Somehow this really only applies to abortion and birth control. I wouldn't be surprised if it got overturned just for being shittily reasoned, but I would be surprised if it happened soon due to nobody really wanting to open that can of worms politically. Maybe if Amy Coney Barret replaces Ginsburg or something. Even then it's not like blue states will ban abortion, and many red one's probably won't entirely either. Seeing more state restrictions on it upheld or not challenged at all seems more likely.

The LP telling people to vote for Clinton in swing states was pretty garbage too. Sorta told me all I needed to know about them.
I'd much rather Roe v Wade used as the basis for striking down all kinds of privacy violating laws than see it removed. Shaky reasoning or no, I prefer the concept of implied rights to implied powers. If the Supreme Court gets to keep the latter I want the former.
 
I'd much rather Roe v Wade used as the basis for striking down all kinds of privacy violating laws than see it removed. Shaky reasoning or no, I prefer the concept of implied rights to implied powers. If the Supreme Court gets to keep the latter I want the former.
I get where you're coming from, but I would personally like to see laws put into place through the legislature or good judicial reasoning. That way the rug can't be pulled out from under us regarding said implied rights. I think striking down bad judicial reasoning is a way to see those issues legitimately addressed and, if popular or proper, brought back with a stronger foundation
 
I get where you're coming from, but I would personally like to see laws put into place through the legislature or good judicial reasoning. That way the rug can't be pulled out from under us regarding said implied rights. I think striking down bad judicial reasoning is a way to see those issues legitimately addressed and, if popular or proper, brought back with a stronger foundation
There is so much bad judicial reasoning going back to the start of the nation that this seems unreasonable to me. Fun if it happened, but unlikely. Besides, as has been pointed out in the thread, there are decisions far weirder than Roe v. Wade. I mean at least amendment nine is fairly vague and kind of talks about implied rights.

You mean other than the "majority of black american conceptions end up being used to fuel medical research for wealthy whites" then sure
But that's a good thing.
just like eugenics

Seriously though establishing new embryonic cell lines isn't something any clinic can do just whenever they want. Most of the materials get thrown away.
eugenics is seriously good though guys give it a try
 
Last edited:
:late:Finally caught up with this thread. I really thought I was the only one who read into this a bit and realized nothing Ford says passes the smell test. Even if you ignore that she waited until she could get 15 minutes of fame and a massive financial incentive to suddenly cry rape, everything falls apart with the slightest scrutiny. I don't know how people can't notice it. I did enjoy the SJW tears though, so there's that.

By far the most fair and intelligent conversation I've seen about Kavanaugh has been here on the fucking Farms. I'm not sure how I feel about that.
 
:late:Finally caught up with this thread. I really thought I was the only one who read into this a bit and realized nothing Ford says passes the smell test. Even if you ignore that she waited until she could get 15 minutes of fame and a massive financial incentive to suddenly cry rape, everything falls apart with the slightest scrutiny. I don't know how people can't notice it. I did enjoy the SJW tears though, so there's that.

By far the most fair and intelligent conversation I've seen about Kavanaugh has been here on the fucking Farms. I'm not sure how I feel about that.
Who better to observe and comment on politics than the experts on spedwatching?
 
State mandated racial segregation is patently unconstitutional though

Doesn't mean it hasn't occurred under people's noses. Spies of Mississippi is about a secret spy agency founded by the Mississippi government called the Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission as a result of Brown v. Board of Education that was meant to keep white supremacy alive during the '50s and '60s with some stragglers well into the '70s before it officially disbanded. They collected data of about 87,000 citizens who they "suspected" to be part of the civil rights movement and communists (so it was their homegrown Red Scare) of whom they framed and blackmailed, drove black business owners to bankruptcy, and were basically the ones behind the Freedom Summer murders (or at least they commended it).

And the governor who started this, James P. Coleman, has a state park named after him, but interestingly enough you don't hear about people screeching to get it renamed.
 
After this entire shitshow Dershowitz is gonna fight to restore the Democratic Party back to its former senses. He's gonna face against the radical Democrats and try to restore order.

Personally I think he'd have a better chance working with FIRE or a similar organization in creating a Civil Liberties Party or something to that effect.

The big threat is that the Social Justice morons are going to try to take over and co-opt any attempt to course-correct.

That's why the entire thing needs to be burnt down.
 
I get where you're coming from, but I would personally like to see laws put into place through the legislature or good judicial reasoning. That way the rug can't be pulled out from under us regarding said implied rights. I think striking down bad judicial reasoning is a way to see those issues legitimately addressed and, if popular or proper, brought back with a stronger foundation

I see that being a possibility, however I think of they do take charge the Democratic party would just die, and it would take a lot longer for a more moderate appealing liberal party to become powerful.

But, I think those pychos are only coming to prominence because the party is such a mess, and a lot of center leaning liberals are disgusted. So the progressive tankies are getting a voice on top because the hill is merely a pile of ashes.

If the Democratic liches, who are essentially the same thing as the worst of the Republican party, were to get couped, I think all the radial troons and commies would get absolutely blown the fuck out by much more center appealing liberal candidates especially if they had an appealing message that wasn't hysterical conspirational ramblings.
 
And this just got shared:
View attachment 562159

Wow, she has higher standards than a PhD thesis.

The big threat is that the Social Justice morons are going to try to take over and co-opt any attempt to course-correct.

That's why the entire thing needs to be burnt down.

Justice Democrats declared Secular Talk and Cenk Uygur too problematic and donated most of their money to Nancy Polosi.

The established people will stay and change their language.
 
Wow, she has higher standards than a PhD thesis.



Justice Democrats declared Secular Talk and Cenk Uygur too problematic and donated most of their money to Nancy Polosi.

The established people will stay and change their language.

Yeah, they got co-opted in seconds.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lysol
Gotta love the irony that the exact same people who dismissed Kavanaugh's *correctly* stating that the Democrats were out to get him (they all said as much, even before the Ford shit came out) as a "conspiracy theory," now trying to claim that Avenatti was a false flag by the Republicans to make the Dems look ridiculous. (As if they needed any help doing that.)
 
:late:Finally caught up with this thread. I really thought I was the only one who read into this a bit and realized nothing Ford says passes the smell test. Even if you ignore that she waited until she could get 15 minutes of fame and a massive financial incentive to suddenly cry rape, everything falls apart with the slightest scrutiny. I don't know how people can't notice it. I did enjoy the SJW tears though, so there's that.

By far the most fair and intelligent conversation I've seen about Kavanaugh has been here on the fucking Farms. I'm not sure how I feel about that.

Yeah. I’ve seen a number of experienced law enforcement types state that they knew instantly Ford was full of shit. She was attempting to run pysch 101 manipulation bs on the Senate, and it was so fucking obvious. The squeaky voice, the tears yet slightly grinning naughty looks. The attempts at inserting secondary narratives into her direct testimony. They were more shocked that this woman is supposed to be a PhD at this sort of thing, it was so blatantly obvious and ham handed. The FBI dismissed anything from her the moment she inserted that “but don’t trust my best friends memory if she says she can’t remember because she’s been really sick” bit into her sworn testimony. That was a huge tell to them that the witness was deliberately lying.
 
I think they were banking on the usually mid term gains by the opposite party to the president, building up this narrative of the wokening, then posing as glorious heroes rising to the challenge after gaining a few seats, maybe the House.

Now, I'd love there to be a bloodbath. I'd probably lean left, but I want the Democratic party to seriously suffer and have to tear down the liches in charge, rather than being essentially the party of GWB they lamented over for 8 years.
You know what really brings me cheer?

I know a lot of left leaning people, and they ALL are saying this. I can't wait for a red wave because it's gonna feel good.

Funny how the MSM keeps saying minutes after election day Trump is hung and HRC is now deity for life. Yet the blue's in my life are saying red ticket or staying home.
 
Back