Aw that sperg who was shitposting about how women can't be abusers got threadbanned already? I legit logged in so that I could tell them to delete their account. Oh well.
Also not sure any of us here talking about BDSM exactly know what we are talking about. I mean I'm not sure we are able to really specify what the fuck they are on about unless we have some folks involved in that community. But, at any rate, I think any reasonable person will agree that Dylan and his ilk are way, way beyond your average leather and whips BDSM shit. Kinky sex with whips and handcuffs is in no way comparable to permanently altering one's body in a bizarre and dangerous manner in the service of perversion.
@MirnaMinkoff said it earlier: People who want to be an all-powerful master who controls slaves 24/7 are the absolute last people you should be entrusting yourself to. Normal people are deeply uncomfortable with being so controlling and domineering all the time; it may be fun to take on that role in the bedroom, but in day-to-day life they just want to treat people normally and be treated normally in turn. I mean really, think of how much energy it would take to play the master role all the damn time (same goes for the slave role). The only people who don’t get exhausted maintaining that role are severe narcissists who get off on having power and debasing others.
Essentially. The most dangerous dominant is one that's insecure about themselves and requires constant validation via the obsessive control over others. Throw in some legitimate deviancy and people start to die as we're seeing here.
It still blows my mind how many people translate "being dominant" to "just be a dick".
@MirnaMinkoff said it earlier: People who want to be an all-powerful master who controls slaves 24/7 are the absolute last people you should be entrusting yourself to. Normal people are deeply uncomfortable with being so controlling and domineering all the time; it may be fun to take on that role in the bedroom, but in day-to-day life they just want to treat people normally and be treated normally in turn. I mean really, think of how much energy it would take to play the master role all the damn time (same goes for the slave role). The only people who don’t get exhausted maintaining that role are severe narcissists who get off on having power and debasing others.
And just think one slave wasn’t nearly enough for Dylan, he needed at least four slaves to “serve” him 24/7.
I think the photo of Tank’s bedroom plastered with hundreds of photos of Dylan let’s one know the extreme level of sociopathic narcissism we are dealing with in Dylan. The Dylan photo wallpaper was mandated by Dylan.
It’s no accident that the man Dylan legally married actually looks the most like himself.
Ironically if Dylan ever ends up in jail over this he can look forward to experiencing the power bottom slave life his pups experienced.
The fact that you say that is kind of funny, because if a shitty gimp transform tool does the same proportions as that dude's art then we got a problem.
He's doing that on purpose to accentuate parts of his body. In fact, it's become his trademark, called "the Dylan pose". You flex your arms downward, put your shoulders forward, push your butt out, and stick out your tongue (or make a duckface) like a re/tard.
:autistic: I know the "male violence caused this" storm has blown over, but sperg I must :autistic:
Controversial opinion incoming, but I agree that men are more likely to go to extremes in this kind of behaviour - particularly where fetishism is involved. A glance at sex crime statistics anywhere in the world will display an overwhelming male majority. Men are simply likelier to do stupid shit for sexual gratification; this has been evident in every culture since the beginning of time.
However, saying "male violence" is at fault is Victorian, prudish garbage. Trying to weave a tragic tapestry of male abusers and female victims is offensive to both sexes. Male violence? Check out LGBT domestic violence statistics some time, and please explain to me how male violence has caused gay men to have a lower incidence of it than lesbians. Women are just as capable of abuse, and painting them as a perpetual victim infantilises them.
Attempting to blame societal problems for freakish incidents like this is not only a fallacy of using an exception to prove a rule - the idea that this is pattern behaviour in male-male relationships is insane - but a fallacy of reasoning. Male behaviour causes male behaviour? What causes the original behaviour? Oh, uh, more behaviour. This reasoning has no point of definite origination or conclusion: this is the social constructionist favourite, circular reasoning.
Yes anyone CAN be but notice how every single one of these fucked up BDSM stories is from a maledom
I'm sure there's a rare outlier out there but it's just that,an outlier
It's because they're furfags and because they're men
But mostly because they're furfags
Wait a second. Free silicone injections? The shit that keeps ending up in the news because things like this keep fucking happening?
Dumpy little manlet Dylan Hafertepen wasn't only content to use injectable silicone to blow up his own scrotum like a puffer fish so he could better resemble his horrible fursona, he had his 'pups' agree to and sign a literal contract letting him dictate exactly how much plastic would be jabbed into their dicks and balls too, because something something muh kink?
All right then.
Please consider every outgoing link in this post NSFW and probably for eyesight and sanity.
Basically, this would seem to be exactly the same procedure that makestheheadlines or the medical literature every so often when a woman (or a man) ends up hospitalizedordead after black-marketbuttinjections. It's just aimed at achieving a coke-can dick and unfeasibly large testicles rather than an ass you could balance a coffee cup on. The list of the ways this procedure can go wrong in the first ten seconds is extensive, and it only gets worse with time.
Even if the injection goes fine, you don't die of the immediateaftereffects, don't get some godawfulinfection (anything up to years later), and the idiot with the syringe hasn't filled you with caulk or cooking oil for the sake of keeping things cheap? That, as Master Dylan has just discovered, doesn't mean you're in the clear. Even when performed perfectly using medical-grade silicone as opposed to something your 'surgeon' bought at Home Depot, free silicone injections have a tendency to harden and migrate. Often, though not always, it migrates downwards because it's mobile, doesn't want to be in the body in the first place, and is affected by gravity and time. Worst case scenario, the former patient ends up like poor Jack. More usually the aftereffects are cosmetic, aren't felt until several years after the injection and the result is something like this:
So, how exactly do you cure this? How, faced with inflammation and hardened skin nodules and a massive case of buyer's remorse, do you get the silicone back out? Well... you can't. Not reliably, anyway, and certainly not without huge expense and massive scarring. The really fucked-up thing is that, at this stage, the chunks of migrated silicone are usually having such a terrible effect on their victims' health, wellbeing and body image that they're just happy the pain and the lumps beneath their flesh are gone.
As to why this wholesale hacking away of flesh is necessary, not only does silicone not stay put, it doesn't stay in the nice sculpted uniform shape the victim thought they were paying for, either. It breaks apart, disintegrates, and infiltrates the tissue around it. Even if you're lucky and it doesn't end up in the lung tissues or the bloodstream, which as the previously linked Tumblr post about large-volume silicone injection points out is an almost certain death sentence, the only reliable way to remove it is to completely remove the affected tissue. For example, if a woman has had free silicone breast injections as opposed to the encapsulated implant, the only solution that a lot of surgeons will recommend is mastectomy. Yup, augment your boobs on the cheap and you could wind up five or ten years later even more flat-chested than when you started.
You too can inject your way into the kind of excision and total reconstructive surgery usually reserved for cancer patients whose boobs are literally trying to kill them! Oh, and you can also get actual cancer from it, too.
Once again: Dylan did this to Jack's dick.
About the only positive is that his own dick is equally plastinated. With any luck, karma and siliconomas are gearing up to bite him in it.
And just think one slave wasn’t nearly enough for Dylan, he needed at least four slaves to “serve” him 24/7.
I think the photo of Tank’s bedroom plastered with hundreds of photos of Dylan let’s one know the extreme level of sociopathic narcissism we are dealing with in Dylan. The Dylan photo wallpaper was mandated by Dylan.
It’s no accident that the man Dylan legally married actually looks the most like himself.
Ironically if Dylan ever ends up in jail over this he can look forward to experiencing the power bottom slave life his pups experienced.
Well, to be fair, extreme Body Mods have always been a thing, and sometimes whole societies were behind it. To women stretching their necks with rings, people inserting plates into their bottom lips, people flattening their heads, and women breaking their feet so they can put them into 3" long shoes. These things were done mostly for status, prestige, or other cultural reasons. Some things, like footbinding, were also done for erotic reasons (with whole fetishes and forms of porn springing up around them.)
Why is San Francisco such a focal point for Fetishism? I dunno. That city's always had a reputation for laid-backness. They even let some random street person declare himself Emperor of America and went along with it just for fun:
