🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, none of the 'right wing' channels even came close to Ralph in terms of popularity and quality, even if Ralph was late and gay every night.

RSBN has 13 times the amount of subscribers as Ralph and will never get shutdown because the viewers are idiot baby boomers, not idiot millennials who think "LMAO FUCK NIGGERS" is humor.
 
This doesn't matter. AT ALL. He's had talks with Richard Spencer and treated him like a human being. That's grounds enough for removal. It didn't matter if all the super-chats were, 'How's the weather today?' Ralph has had white nationalists, black nationalists, extremists, fuck he even was going to get David Duke on. You think 1488 superchats did him in? Come the fuck on. He had a late night show with 5k+ consistent, every night. He made a charity stream that raised 27k. Just having a person the left doesn't like on even if Ralph doesn't agree with him is grounds for being a Nazi by association.

thats part of the thing. when you start bringing in people like david duke, that's pretty much optics poison to the normie world. right or wrong, people are not down with that shit.
 
I just read thru my email and found out about all of this from this lovely image

fuck you WSJ.png



FUCK YOU WALL STREET JOURNAL
 
RSBN has 13 times the amount of subscribers as Ralph and will never get shutdown because the viewers are idiot baby boomers, not idiot millennials who think "LMAO FUCK NIGGERS" is humor.
What triggered the reaction of Google and the WSJ is not the number of subs, it's the amount of people who are watching live.
 
-Free speech banned:agree:
-Media tightly controlled by a select few:agree:
-Un-personed for wrong think:agree:
-pretense of benefiting the whole, yet really only helping a select few:agree:

Sounds like sounds pretty right wing to me.

Humans have no wings! We are all heroes when we fight the power and bastards when we got some.
 
RSBN has 13 times the amount of subscribers as Ralph and will never get shutdown because the viewers are idiot baby boomers, not idiot millennials who think "LMAO FUCK NIGGERS" is humor.

It is not just youtube that is like this. Ask anyone who does network systems, computer engineering etc. Windows is incredibly frustrating because they own market share, but they are taking away more and more features with new editions of windows. The problem is that the largest market for them are idiot boomers sharing cat photos and recipes online.
 
What triggered the reaction of Google and the WSJ is not the number of subs, it's the amount of people who are watching live.

There are 27,000 people watching RSBN right this moment and the chat box looks like this:

upload_2018-11-2_20-30-9.png


Youtube hates this shit and they KNOW that they cannot legitimize removing this content or even delisting it. If this was filled with a bunch of talk about how we should hang furries (we should), get rid of Israel (we should), and incorrect doxx on random Asian broads in San Francisco, this channel would be gone in a week. Ralph's audience was simply too retarded to play it cool for any length of time and gave Youtube the excuse they were looking for to shut it down.
 
I'm talking about the mechanism that is being used to delete his channel. Richard Spencer, alt-right viewpoints and even nazi viewpoints are not disallowed by Youtube - they obviously don't want that content on their website, but like nudity, it's all allowed in the proper context.

See, this runs pretty contrary to this:

What isn't allowed, explicitly, is (What they define as) hate speech in comment boxes and superchats. The fact that you can't turn on this stream (Or MundaneMatt's) without seeing a nonstop stream of idiots playing Nazi Dress-Up in text serves to legitimize Youtube's deplatforming of Ralph in the eyes of whatever megacorp they is paying them the most ad revenue this week.

Because it doesn't make any fucking sense. Having the guests on in the first place, or even bringing up these topics on the show, are more impactful than than having the peanut gallery say what they will. Aside from that, YouTube has never (to my knowledge) said anything to that effect - not that it'd matter anyway considering that they'll fuck over anyone that they deem "unpersonable".

Also lmao at the idea that you find having Implicit Dick as a guest comparable to nudity.

RSBN has 13 times the amount of subscribers as Ralph and will never get shutdown because the viewers are idiot baby boomers, not idiot millennials who think "LMAO FUCK NIGGERS" is humor.

So you're not only tacitly but openly agreeing with the idea that as long as you don't say things that these corporate moralists view as wrongthink you're fine? Because the funny fucking thing about censors is that they never stop shrinking the circle of views allowed to go past them until everyone is saying exactly what they want. You can bet your ass that RSBN will be up on the chopping block eventually if these people are allowed to take an axe to anyone/anything they view as threatening their monopoly on the public discourse.

There are 27,000 people watching RSBN right this moment and the chat box looks like this:


Youtube hates this shit and they KNOW that they cannot legitimize removing this content or even delisting it. If this was filled with a bunch of talk about how we should hang furries (we should), get rid of Israel (we should), and incorrect doxx on random Asian broads in San Francisco, this channel would be gone in a week. Ralph's audience was simply too exceptional to play it cool for any length of time and gave Youtube the excuse they were looking for to shut it down.

It still wouldn't ultimately have mattered because he was willing to have on the guests that he was. You seem like you're just pissed off at Ralph's fanbase at this point.
 
I haven't got an email. I'm wondering if they only refunded offensive tweets. You donated $14.88, so they probably went through the donations and refunded anything that was mean spirited to them.


I was actually worried that YouTube would say "Fuck you racist this money is going to a transsexual Mexican"

I wonder if they kept your money because you own and operate a website dedicated to killing trannys
 
I haven't got an email. I'm wondering if they only refunded offensive tweets. You donated $14.88, so they probably went through the donations and refunded anything that was mean spirited to them.
I honestly don't know the answer to the verification question. I have heard it said but not good at remembering stuff like that. Maybe make the question easier?
 
Remember as always: Google private company; Google do whatever. Yoree Koh just did what she needed to do to protect herself and her family.

It's not an attack on free speech if private companies remove unwanted opinions after all, right? And the charity donations came from bad people, so the money's equally bad.

So there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back