🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

[HG 400]

The hysterical crazies become the politicians regardless of where they are on the autism & political spectrums so they are an issue.

Well-groomed psychopaths in suits become the politicians not jobless screeching trannies on twitter, are you literally retarded?

Should we instead let the screeching mentally ill cunts that go to rallies and protests convince us they're some kind of majority? That behavior isn't exactly confined to safe spaces online.

It's a couple hundred speds having a day out and shouting about politics, normal people have jobs to go to and kids to raise.

 

[JustStopDude]

My biggest issue is that this is starting to set a precedent for, “your money’s no good here.”

This is not a precedent. This has always been the case for mass media.

 

[Cinderblock]

Yo I thought we agreed that we would all stop acting like triggered faggots over this?

Yes, I agree. Some one should pass the memo to @Sheryl Nome. Her beautiful white bikini might get stained from all the poop she's swimming in. Also, unironically screeching about what a precedent will be on KF is an extremely useful pursuit of time and mental energy.

 

[Done]

When did this thread become a place for faggots to whine about their free speech? I thought we were making fun of ralph and his problems.

Glad you mentioned that.

So can we finally get this thread back to its roots, and talk about how much of a full-blown cow Ralph is and how he reacted vs how Metokur acted when in almost the exact same circumstances?

- Some reporter makes a news piece on the Killstream and asks for his comment, in response to that, he then proceeds to dig into her information while livestreaming. Yes, he somehow managed to find a more retarded alternative to fucking Discord ops, the fucking drunkcow.

- The WSJ reports the stream and it goes down, because no one should ever get to dox some reporter on fucking air, Ralph gets a very well-deserved strike, like, I don't care about doxing as a whole, hell, I've posted multiple doxes of cows..etc, but I sure as fuck don't fucking do it on my public-facing accounts, especially ones I make money on. Instead of appealing the stream and maybe, just maybe containing the damage, he proceeds to chimp out on Twitter like the lolcow he is, to the point where fellow cows like Sherratt can't help but laugh at his ass, and rightly so too.

- Then St. Jude Hospital refunds the donations (because charities never take donations from anything even remotely sounding like a Nazi, I can't believe I have to explain this), and instead of A) Finding another charity and promising to do a new livestream when he fixes things, B) Trying to make a hashtag campaign or a new stream to re-donate the money to the hospital in a less retarded way, or C) Being a grown-up and just saying "eh we tried", He went on the most autistic warpath with some edgy hashtag about WSJ stealing the cost of less than 15 minutes of operation from the Hospital, and giving the reporter the opportunity to reliably print "and he and his followers harassed me and the paper for this piece". Way to make your enemy look good.

This also gets other services to look at him and ban him as well, getting him into deeper shit. Because like every other cow has discovered, chimp-outs have consequences.

Compare this to how Jim acted in very similar circumstances: He mostly kept quiet, didn't chimp, worked to find out what exactly happened, and executed a back-up plan he previously had in place.

He also managed his community to some extent, an example of this is when people got mass-retarded and started doxing some random SJW hamplanet, he told ppl to knock it off. Did you think that he did it out of the kindness of his heart? Because he somehow found mercy for said SJW hamplanet? No. He very likely did it because he wanted to avoid escalation, because he thought "well, even if I lose my channel/superchats because of this, maybe I can still keep the Patreon if I handle this properly".

TL;DR: Ralph is a cow and he got what cows always get. Free Speech or not.

 

[George Cuckzunian]

It's strange to me that the Healstream money is returned (supposedly by St. Jude, but they probably didn't know about the 1488-posting until after Koh contacted their PR rep), but YouTube's policy on "hate speech" superchats is to donate them to charity anyway. I guess some bigots have nicer dollars than others.

How long do you guys think Ralph has before his Patreon or PayPal is shut down? They're not gonna ease up on him anytime soon if they're going as far as taking away his Streamlabs and whatnot already.

I am surprised people forgot about this, but Ralph confirmed with St. Judes ahead of time they would accept the donation and warned them that they were a raunchy comedy show and St Judes confirmed there was no problem. He talked about it for a full week getting in touch with St judes cause the last thing he wanted to do was waste time doing the healstream only to have it all go back. In other words, it is 100% pressure from WSJ to refund the money to avoid optics for the hit peace.

How long till Ralph is dropped from pay pal and Patreon? Depends on when the payment processors threaten to pull funding. Stripe and Mastercard threatening to pull service and funding seems to always come before these decisions are made and patreon has caved before for this reason.

 

[JustStopDude]

TL;DR: Ralph is a cow and he got what cows always get. Free Speech or not.

I agree. I would love to know what Ralph and company expected would happen when they immediately went to twitter and start telling people to harass the reporter in question, the WSJ, Google, Youtube, and everyone else involved...

Ralph confirmed with St. Judes ahead of time they would accept the donation and warned them that they were a raunchy comedy show and St Judes confirmed there was no problem.

No way in hell did Ralph tell a St Jude representative that they were going to have a Holocaust denier on a stream to discuss whether or not the jews rode in a roller coaster to the ovens.

 

[HarvurdChikee]

i think we should get them deplatformed, destroy their sources of revenue, and inform them that its not censorship, its just a private company (tm) and it can do whatever it wants

you have good ideas and i like the cut of your jib.

 

[HG 400]

a raunchy comedy show

Most people hear "raunchy comedy" and assume there's jokes about titties and poop, not five thousand unironic neo-nazis circlejerking about how the holocaust didn't happen (but they wish it did).

Look, nobody's against edgy humour. In my progressive circles we all enjoy hashtagging killallmen and making jokes about kulaks had it coming, especially when it shows how disingenious certain edgyboy alt-righters are when they choose to forget everything they know about edgyboi memery and take it deathly seriously. But we still understand there's a time and a place for that kind of memeing. You all say 'the left can't meme' but the truth is, we just know when it isn't appropriate to meme, and it's not appropriate to make memes about being neo-nazis when you're using your own public-facing nightly show to raise money for charity.

 

[AnOminous]

Ethan Ralph is a fat drunken sperg and they should throw him back in jail for being autistic.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

discuss whether or not the jews rode in a roller coaster to the ovens.

This is horrible and funny at the sime time and should be a random txt

 

[Cinderblock]

Ethan Ralph is a fat drunken sperg and they should throw him back in jail for being autistic.

To be fair to Ralph, he probably makes most his decisions with over three times the legal driving limit of alcohol in his blood. Even in the charity stream the dude was so drunk he forgot to turn the stream for like 15 minutes IIRC.

 

[Done]

Ethan Ralph is a fat drunken sperg and they should throw him back in jail for being autistic.

Autism should absolutely be a punishable crime.

That would make Kiwi Farms the underground railroad of autism, and who wouldn't want that!?

 

[ComeoutandJULAY]

Tonight's stream is live:

https://dlive.tv/theralphretort

https://mn-nl-glb.mncdn.com/dlive/transcode-4-136/theralphretort/playlist.m3u8

 

[northstar747]

Most people hear "raunchy comedy" and assume there's jokes about titties and poop, not five thousand unironic neo-nazis circlejerking about how the holocaust didn't happen (but they wish it did).

Look, nobody's against edgy humour. In my progressive circles we all enjoy hashtagging killallmen and making jokes about kulaks had it coming, especially when it shows how disingenious certain edgyboy alt-righters are when they choose to forget everything they know about edgyboi memery and take it deathly seriously. But we still understand there's a time and a place for that kind of memeing. You all say 'the left can't meme' but the truth is, we just know when it isn't appropriate to meme, and it's not appropriate to make memes about being neo-nazis when you're using your own public-facing nightly show to raise money for charity.

do you consider yourself a leftist? I remember your roll in the shmorky SA troon doxing.

 

[verissimus]

Thanks for the 2nd link comeout.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Ralph probably could have avoided all this shit if he just you know

Played the JF game and just didn't read the 14.88 gang gang superchats naming (((them))) and all that, but he's actually an alt-right anti-semite fag so he can't help himself

 

[Done]

Ralph probably could have avoided all this shit if he just you know

Played the JF game and just didn't read the 14.88 gang gang superchats naming (((them))) and all that, but he's actually an alt-right anti-semite fag so he can't help himself

YT are clearly going to break-up the party pretty soon anyways, but JF was quoted in the WSJ article, and through doing so, probably bought himself a few more streams of autistic superchat donations.

do you consider yourself a leftist? I remember your roll in the shmorky SA troon doxing.

You don't have to be right-wing to find the funny side of the SA troon dox saga.

 

[boulderblundermatt]

Glad you mentioned that.

So can we finally get this thread back to its roots, and talk about how much of a full-blown cow Ralph is and how he reacted vs how Metokur acted when in almost the exact same circumstances?

- Some reporter makes a news piece on the Killstream and asks for his comment, in response to that, he then proceeds to dig into her information while livestreaming. Yes, he somehow managed to find a more exceptional alternative to fucking Discord ops, the fucking drunkcow.

- The WSJ reports the stream and it goes down, because no one should ever get to dox some reporter on fucking air, Ralph gets a very well-deserved strike, like, I don't care about doxing as a whole, hell, I've posted multiple doxes of cows..etc, but I sure as fuck don't fucking do it on my public-facing accounts, especially ones I make money on. Instead of appealing the stream and maybe, just maybe containing the damage, he proceeds to chimp out on Twitter like the lolcow he is, to the point where fellow cows like Sherratt can't help but laugh at his ass, and rightly so too.

- Then St. Jude Hospital refunds the donations (because charities never take donations from anything even remotely sounding like a Nazi, I can't believe I have to explain this), and instead of A) Finding another charity and promising to do a new livestream when he fixes things, B) Trying to make a hashtag campaign or a new stream to re-donate the money to the hospital in a less exceptional way, or C) Being a grown-up and just saying "eh we tried", He went on the most autistic warpath with some edgy hashtag about WSJ stealing the cost of less than 15 minutes of operation from the Hospital, and giving the reporter the opportunity to reliably print "and he and his followers harassed me and the paper for this piece". Way to make your enemy look good.

This also gets other services to look at him and ban him as well, getting him into deeper shit. Because like every other cow has discovered, chimp-outs have consequences.

Compare this to how Jim acted in very similar circumstances: He mostly kept quiet, didn't chimp, worked to find out what exactly happened, and executed a back-up plan he previously had in place.

He also managed his community to some extent, an example of this is when people got mass-exceptional and started doxing some random SJW hamplanet, he told ppl to knock it off. Did you think that he did it out of the kindness of his heart? Because he somehow found mercy for said SJW hamplanet? No. He very likely did it because he wanted to avoid escalation, because he thought "well, even if I lose my channel/superchats because of this, maybe I can still keep the Patreon if I handle this properly".

TL;DR: Ralph is a cow and he got what cows always get. Free Speech or not.

I have to reply to this specific comment and point out the insane stupidity on display. Apologies for the autism incoming, but this man pinch just the right nerve to activate it, so prepare motherfucker.

first, let me point out one massive problem with your statement. this isn't just some company deciding to take down take down a livestream with a reporters dox. they are going full salted earth tactics with this. Not only did it not work in any conceivable way, it backfired. the WSJ's name is now forever etched with #WSJkillskids, and for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, quite the delicious scandal was uncovered enough that its making WSJ freak out and pulling every favor they have on the net. The biggest evidence is this; why would Zidan have his entire google account deleted, if it was just his youtube that was being naughty? simple. collusion.

second, ralph is not jim and jim is not ralph, ralph is ralph and jim is jim and they are both different people with different styles doing different things that sometimes crossover. I admit, i'm no fan of ralph simply because I don't like his style. However, even I smell the bullshit from these past few days. The fact i have to point out they're completely different to you and that it's like comparing an apple and clay pots is retarded on your part.

third, and final point, is that it was confirmed that st.judes did not in fact refund it. It was in fact youtube that did it. It was them sending out the refunds. if it was st.judes, vastly different emails would have been sent. I won't contest whether or not they knew who ralph was, whether or not they did intend to refund, or whether or not they accepted it. I also have to point out how shady it is that youtube is holding money meant for charity.

there, sperging over. hoped everyone learned some, have a nice day, i'm gonna go for lunch.

 

[Done]

I have to reply to this specific comment and point out the insane stupidity on display. Apologies for the autism incoming, but this man pinch just the right nerve to activate it, so prepare motherfucker.

first, let me point out one massive problem with your statement. this isn't just some company deciding to take down take down a livestream with a reporters dox. they are going full salted earth tactics with this. Not only did it not work in any conceivable way, it backfired. the WSJ's name is now forever etched with #WSJkillskids, and for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, quite the delicious scandal was uncovered enough that its making WSJ freak out and pulling every favor they have on the net. The biggest evidence is this; why would Zidan have his entire google account deleted, if it was just his youtube that was being naughty? simple. collusion.

second, ralph is not jim and jim is not ralph, ralph is ralph and jim is jim and they are both different people with different styles doing different things that sometimes crossover. I admit, i'm no fan of ralph simply because I don't like his style. However, even I smell the bullshit from these past few days. The fact i have to point out they're completely different to you and that it's like comparing an apple and clay pots is exceptional on your part.

third, and final point, is that it was confirmed that st.judes did not in fact refund it. It was in fact youtube that did it. It was them sending out the refunds. if it was st.judes, vastly different emails would have been sent. I won't contest whether or not they knew who ralph was, whether or not they did intend to refund, or whether or not they accepted it. I also have to point out how shady it is that youtube is holding money meant for charity.

there, sperging over. hoped everyone learned some, have a nice day, i'm gonna go for lunch.

One thing I find especially hilarious is that you think the WSJ are cashing in any favors for this. As if lolcows somehow needed help to fail in life.

Enjoy your lunch and watch the alcohol, I hear it makes people do stupid, self-destructive things.

 

[boulderblundermatt]

One thing I find especially hilarious is that you think the WSJ are cashing in any favors for this. As if lolcows somehow needed help to fail in life.

Enjoy your lunch and watch the alcohol, I hear it makes people do stupid, self-destructive things.

Oh, i'm not going to contest whether than ralph is a lolcow or not (he is, he totally is. you have to be in order to literally try attacking police while drunk). What i'm saying is that either the WSJ got so triggered that they played themselves or ralph drunkenly stumbled into the most hilarious of circumstances and the planets aligned for him to make use of it.