Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

YEAH YEAH YEAH!

Something everyone should remember: we all have individual preferences and no one is obligated to be attracted to you or fuck you.

Well, that's how it used to be, before personal prefference became problematic to unaffected third parties, entitling them to remedy, on your dime......

I'm sure there are SJWs out there earnestly arguing that if your favorite color is red, it means you're fetishistic towards native american women, you racist bastard, burn in Hell and get demonitized once we mass-strike your social media page.

NO, we aren't the racists for coming up with the five-degrees-from-Kevin-Bacon logic leap it took to get there, it just proves we're so woke that even the most microscopic and camouflaged racism you try use can't get by us!
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vault Boy
One could assume that with the response that OP got, the Alliance guy could be seen as a racist for calling an African American man a rapist.

I'd tell her she has to eat ALL the eggs.
6ed.jpg
 
Does anyone even read National Geographic anymore? When I think of National Geographic magazine, I think of those yellow books that old people have in their musty old basements, with pictures of topless tribal women with ugly flat tits, between all the advertisements.
That's how it always been! I don't suppose they do the topless thing much anymore.
 
Does anyone even read National Geographic anymore? When I think of National Geographic magazine, I think of those yellow books that old people have in their musty old basements, with pictures of topless tribal women with ugly flat tits, between all the advertisements.

It used to be a great, informative, and highly respected magazine. Until 21st Century Fox bought it in 2015.

And now, well...
gender-revolution-ngm-covers-768x552.png
 
I see it's ruined beyond hope.

I liked it better when it was more or less objective articles on interesting things around the world. Now it's sensational, political, and up its own ass with socjus nonsense and trying to create controversy.

They also felt the need to apologize for all their old articles from the early 1900s because they gave the impression that primitive tribals were less civilized than modern people and this could be triggering to muh PoCs or some shit like that.
 
They also felt the need to apologize for all their old articles from the early 1900s because they gave the impression that primitive tribals were less civilized than modern people and this could be triggering to muh PoCs or some shit like that.
Which sounds rediculous to me since that comes off kinda backhanded on the past.
 
Back