"Jim" / James Augustine née James Patrick O'Shaughnessy / Mister Metokur / Jim81Jim / Internet Aristocrat - His autistic videos and the gay beta "sweetie squad" who mindlessly suck his cock.

Is James Augustine FUCKING DEAD?

  • Yes! Another Vtumour simp kicks the bucket.

    Votes: 230 35.9%
  • NO. Antis are just writing fan fiction 😭😭😭😭😭

    Votes: 410 64.1%

  • Total voters
    640
Metokurist has it so he will get it back up somehow I'm sure. He has kept up copyrighted videos before by loopholing. I do have it downloaded just in case though.

The Barbara Streisand Effect alone ensures that this stream will be mirrored multiple times no matter how many get copyright struck. Still though, I like to error on the side of caution and download a copy.
 
The Barbara Streisand Effect alone ensures that this stream will be mirrored multiple times no matter how many get copyright struck. Still though, I like to error on the side of caution and download a copy.
He actually just said he is working on a new upload in Josh's stream chat.

He reuploaded
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
Reactions: Cosmos
The Barbara Streisand Effect alone ensures that this stream will be mirrored multiple times no matter how many get copyright struck. Still though, I like to error on the side of caution and download a copy.

Honestly, that's not really true. I've seen more than a few vids disappear due to various forms of censorship. Recently the killstream lost some vids permanently when they got banned off youtube. You can't find many Alex Jones videos now. And I've seen more serious shit being hidden. Believing that the streisand effect will always save you is as wishy washy as believing that files are safe and eternally available in "the cloud".
 
Yes we can blame and mock A-Logs, there's at least a dozen cow threads that were made for people who A-Logged cows. This simple fact honestly has me wondering how you can think otherwise after being on this site for however long you've been on it?

About a year ago, Jim himself advised Fred Fuchs, the then-leader of the Sons of Kojima (KF, ED), that they were getting too autistic with their constant 5-hour streams on DSP, and warned them that they were running the risk of being seen as A-Logs, this warning went unheeded, and well, the threads/pages speak for themselves.

Fast forward to today, and Jim is consistently making constant 5 hour streams on Sargon. He's constantly tweeting about him every hour of every day. He is ignoring his own advice.

This isn't "somewhat A-Loggish", this is a full-bore autismal obsession.

Here's my take on this, if you make a single video about Sargon and move on to other business, then you can easily destroy him. The Suits video alone was enough for this IMO, he could have left it at that. Despite being a lolcow himself, Sargon somewhat understands this, because he did it with MovieBob way back when GG was a thing.

Right now, if a few Sargon leaks happen, Jim makes a 5 hour stream, if Sargon subtweets him or replies to him, Jim makes a 5 hour stream and jumps on 2 more livstreams. At this point, you have to wonder who's getting the bigger reaction here, i.e. who's trolling who?
I guess that's fair. To be honest I don't really care if Jimmy turns into another Sargon A-log. I'll still gander and look on for entertainment :story:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Draza
Genuine question, what is trolling if not continually placing bait in front of exceptional individuals?

You don't have to be a normie to be a troll, hell, the original internet troll turned out to be a deeply salty cuck himself. The biggest question in trolling isn't who's more exceptional, it's who's taking the bait?
IMO what separates good trolling from bad trolling is a good troll is able to get a reaction way out of proportion to the provocation, while a bad troll just acts like a massive shithead in the hopes of getting any reaction. Its a lot more funny to laugh at some kid screaming "DELETE THIS" in gmod because someone pinned him to a wall than it is to watch two spergs flag eachother because while the first sperg hides behind "I was only trying to permanently get you deplatformed because it makes you mad!"

If the reaction to your trolling is less retarded than the trolling itself, you are just being a stupid sperg on the internet.

Maybe that's just the fact I'm a newfag, but that's how I see it.
 
IMO what separates good trolling from bad trolling is a good troll is able to get a reaction way out of proportion to the provocation, while a bad troll just acts like a massive shithead in the hopes of getting any reaction. Its a lot more funny to laugh at some kid screaming "DELETE THIS" in gmod because someone pinned him to a wall than it is to watch two spergs flag eachother because while the first sperg hides behind "I was only trying to permanently get you deplatformed because it makes you mad!"

If the reaction to your trolling is less exceptional than the trolling itself, you are just being a stupid sperg on the internet.

Maybe that's just the fact I'm a newfag, but that's how I see it.

This has been a long build up though, the rivalry between Jim and Sargon started back in the gamergate days, the difference is that with each attempt to bring Jim into the skeptic fold, it alienated the two sides to the point where they're now both openly hostile to each other. It's moved past the point of trolling at this point, and neither of them has anything in order to get a knock out blow.

I'm rather disgusted with Sargon's actions lately, and those in the "skeptic fold" but I really think at this point its not just Jim vs Sargon, it's Jim vs Skeptics. Quarterpounder, Donga, Boulderking, Trout, Shitrat, The Romanian Carrier Pigeon, and Carl of Applebee's have all been acting exceptional this last week, all have a burning hatred of Jim. Even if they didn't get Ralph booted off by using the WSJ directly, it makes sense to claim they did if its gonna mind fuck Jim and make him leave youtube, which I think is really what their goal is.
 
Jim is now aware of Kittystyle.
If that weird fuck doesn't simmer down, he's going to become the topic of a stream.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IamnottheNSA
This has been a long build up though, the rivalry between Jim and Sargon started back in the gamergate days, the difference is that with each attempt to bring Jim into the skeptic fold, it alienated the two sides to the point where they're now both openly hostile to each other. It's moved past the point of trolling at this point, and neither of them has anything in order to get a knock out blow.

I'm rather disgusted with Sargon's actions lately, and those in the "skeptic fold" but I really think at this point its not just Jim vs Sargon, it's Jim vs Skeptics. Quarterpounder, Donga, Boulderking, Trout, Shitrat, The Romanian Carrier Pigeon, and Carl of Applebee's have all been acting exceptional this last week, all have a burning hatred of Jim. Even if they didn't get Ralph booted off by using the WSJ directly, it makes sense to claim they did if its gonna mind fuck Jim and make him leave youtube, which I think is really what their goal is.
Is ShitRat even a skeptic? Last I knew he went full SJW... I mean "Progressive".
 
Is ShitRat even a skeptic? Last I knew he went full SJW... I mean "Progressive".
Shitrat is whatever the fuck he thinks gives him the tiniest chance of getting his feminine dick wet. Yesterday he was le rational skeptic because he wanted lauren-senpai to notice him. Now he's butthurt he couldn't score his conservative waifu and is not only switching sides to try and get good boy points but is likely to go full troon
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus
Genuine question, what is trolling if not continually placing bait in front of exceptional individuals?
Bait: Writing literally hundreds of tweets where you come off as a petty asshole every day, completely ruining what little reputation you've ever had as a serious political figure. Deploying your autistic mafia in 24 hour ops in order to get people deplatformed. Reacting to your "victims'" reaction with streams that are even longer than theirs. Losing your child.

Reaction: Getting mad and doing streams where you make hundreds of dollars in superchats. Dead baby jokes.

At that point the only one you're trolling is yourself. I really wish Jim would stop talking about Don Spergone, but in the end one of them is ruining his reputation and wasting time he could have spent r̶a̶i̶s̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶d̶i̶n̶o̶s̶a̶u̶r̶s̶ p̶l̶a̶y̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶D̶&̶D̶ engaging in international politics, the other he's doing what he's always done: making fun of exceptional individuals.
 
@ExceptionallyExceptional

Well let's look at the list/general features these people have in common (think there was a good list on the skeptic community thread)

1) A-religious? Check
2) Anti-conservative? Check
3) Anti-PC (the vast majority of these people are most of the time , so I'll include it)? Check
4) Generally has no or very few general (that is held by others) beliefs, morals, and standards they abide by? Check
5) Wannabe pseudo-intellectual online critic that barely knows what he or she is talking about? Check
6) Regularly spergs? Check
7) Fairly unlikable? Check
8.) Regularly hangs out with other people that fit most of the above description'? Check

He pretty much fits the definition to the T.
 
Last edited:
Is ShitRat even a skeptic? Last I knew he went full SJW... I mean "Progressive".
No. Everyone who is friendly or on "Sargon's side" is being labeled as a skeptic arbitrarily.

Q#, SFO, Vee, aren't skeptics, but are called that anyways. The only actual people of the "skeptic" group who have been involved are Sargon and Kraut.
 
Bait: Writing literally hundreds of tweets where you come off as a petty asshole every day, completely ruining what little reputation you've ever had as a serious political figure. Deploying your autistic mafia in 24 hour ops in order to get people deplatformed. Reacting to your "victims'" reaction with streams that are even longer than theirs. Losing your child.

Reaction: Getting mad and doing streams where you make hundreds of dollars in superchats. Dead baby jokes.

At that point the only one you're trolling is yourself. I really wish Jim would stop talking about Don Spergone, but in the end one of them is ruining his reputation and wasting time he could have spent r̶a̶i̶s̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶d̶i̶n̶o̶s̶a̶u̶r̶s̶ p̶l̶a̶y̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶D̶&̶D̶ engaging in international politics, the other he's doing what he's always done: making fun of exceptional individuals.
If he likes talking about Kekistan, I hope he likes a Kekistani flag on his dead child's grave because he is weak, his bloodline is weak, and he will not survive the winter.
 
@ExceptionallyExceptional

Well let's look at the list/general features these people have in common (think there was a good list on the skeptic community thread)

1) A-religious? Check
2) Anti-conservative? Check
3) Anti-PC (the vast majority of these people are most of the time , so I'll include it)? Check
4) Generally has no or very few general (that is held by others) beliefs, morals, and standards they abide by? Check
5) Wannabe pseudo-intellectual online critic that barely knows what he or she is talking about? Check
6) Regularly spergs? Check
7) Fairly unlikable? Check
8.) Regularly hangs out with other people that fit the most of the above description'? Check

He pretty much fits the definition to the T.
Can't most of those be applied to SJWs as well? Except the Anti-PC thing, which David seems to be moving more and more away from considering his last video was moralfagging at PewDiePie over the Killstream. To ShitRat jokes about the holocaust are verboten now.
 
No. Everyone who is friendly or on "Sargon's side" is being labeled as a skeptic arbitrarily.

Q#, SFO, Vee, aren't skeptics, but are called that anyways. The only actual people of the "skeptic" group who have been involved are Sargon and Kraut.
Since when is vee not a sceptic?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: instythot
Back