Zoosadist Joshua Hoffman / Kero the Wolf / Radiance / Hakan Yote / BestYotie / KeroYamimora / Yami the Wolf

[Waveysauce]

Is there a source for this?

yes the direct people who did it. but anything further just asks the mods here im not trying to get thread banned for bringing it up.

If it wasnt for trying to extort him and then doxing innocent people like 5 times going of stupid ice cream pictures and were patient about making sure its all correct then he would've least had his own part in the mega thread. The people who cant contact with him did say he was trying to humanize himself and was very apologetic, but again no abuse laws in cuba but he was still very freaked out because everyone around him knows so at least thats something

 

[s0mbra]

Edit: nvm answered.

Also I hate to even remotely defend furfags, but for me fantasy does not equal reality. Just because it interests you on a fictional level, does not mean you want to partake in it in any real world capacity, or think the real world equivalent of it is appealing in any way. Perhaps I'm just projecting and giving the majority of people the benifit of the doubt.

Yes, cerain types of fictional content (not just porn) can attract certain types of unsavory people who DO like the real world aspect, but those who don't shouldn't be punished for it.

Personally, as long as no one is being (unconsentually) hurt or being exposed to it against their will, I don't give a shit what people do in their personal lives, weather I personally approve of it or not.
But that's way off topic. I just hate hearing this type of shit.

Back on topic, it's a damn shame woof will probably go right back into his old ways (didn't he open up a new zoo chat? Or was it someone else?). I hope that now his family apparently knows they can do something about it.
I can't remember, did he have contact with kero as well? Or just snakething?

 

[Vertebraille]

FWIW there's plenty of non-illegal/non-immoral/literally impossible stuff people are into fictionally but not in reality so I absolutely think fantasy and reality CAN have a separation in one's sexuality, however yeah it's fucking sketch when people consume drawn porn of Real Bad Shit

Kind of a It's-Not-Necessarily-A-Red-Flag-But-Maybe-An-Orange-One

 

[Moxy$$]

Remember his video on "its OK to mursuit?" Hell no it's not ok to mursuit. This roadkill fucker should be ostrisised from the very fandom he calls home.

 

[billydero]

FWIW there's plenty of non-illegal/non-immoral/literally impossible stuff people are into fictionally but not in reality so I absolutely think fantasy and reality CAN have a separation in one's sexuality, however yeah it's fucking sketch when people consume drawn porn of Real Bad Shit

Kind of a It's-Not-Necessarily-A-Red-Flag-But-Maybe-An-Orange-One

I agree, definitely an orange flag. Big orange flag.

Interesting responses on this one and I do think it’s on topic, in a sideways sort of way. While not acting on these zoophillic ideas and just keeping it imaginary does mean no one is harmed or hurt, and while I’m not saying anyone has to change, I think it still undermines the ability of other furries to objectively react to the zoosadist situation.

I think they have a ‘well, I’m weird too, and I don’t want to draw attention lest my weird be taken away’ attitude that combined with the open arms/accept everybody credo, means their fandoms going to be filled with zoophiles and zoosadists for years to come.

 

[mildly_miffed_69]

FWIW there's plenty of non-illegal/non-immoral/literally impossible stuff people are into fictionally but not in reality so I absolutely think fantasy and reality CAN have a separation in one's sexuality, however yeah it's fucking sketch when people consume drawn porn of Real Bad Shit

Kind of a It's-Not-Necessarily-A-Red-Flag-But-Maybe-An-Orange-One

i disagree. it's a full-blown red flag if someone is consuming drawn porn of something normally illegal/immoral in reality.

if someone consumes art of legitimate children/animals being raped, they have a serious problem and need to get professional help before it becomes everyone else's problem.

 

[catdog]

You know, despite my extreme disgust, I am grateful for Kero's internet presence.

If not for his popularity, this wouldn't have blown up like it did and we would not be looking at jail time for multiple animal rapists and killers.

So, thank you, Kero's 12 year old fan base. You made all of this possible.

 

[psychoparrot]

I realize this is going to be an unpopular opinion, but -

Aren’t all furries zoophiles, or at least have zoophillic tendencies?

Seems like all furry art is either hardcore porn, or at the least softcore glamor art, of creatures with animal elements - muzzles, tails, hooves, fur, whatever. And if the character is male it more often than not has animal genitals.

I may be off base here but it seems to me that’s why we see so many defenders for Kero and his cohorts - other furries may not act on these impulses but they know that the line between them and guys like Kero is razor thin, and what they are really doing, when they defend him or just ignore it, is trying to defend their own degeneracy.

You're close to right, but it's not the animal elements generally speaking. You'll run into severely autistic guys who think their dogs are in love with them, but I think that the majority of the bestiality going on is tied to common themes in the seedier parts of the gay community. It's why when you see some other animal than a horse or dog, you usually get a human penis. I think that most furries these days at least only make animal people because it's exotic and it fits the established convention. There's tons of monster/alien porn out there and there's a huge overlap between those circles. Furries just have dedicated conventions where tons of autistic prison-gay losers go to give each other HIV (they even have multiple testing rooms at some cons).

tl;dr it's not because they're furry, it's because they're gay and autistic and in large numbers so of course they commit horrible sex crimes.

If you don't believe me, look up "sashabelle"s art in a mega link on U18chan. Guy was a gay cub rape artist and turns out he had unreleased drawings of him brutally raping dogs in front of horrified houseguests. He's one of the bigger or mid-sized gay artists. Goes by @sethpup on twitter and FA, he could probably fill you in on how this stuff works.

 

[mildly_miffed_69]

You're close to right, but it's not the animal elements generally speaking. You'll run into severely autistic guys who think their dogs are in love with them, but I think that the majority of the bestiality going on is tied to common themes in the seedier parts of the gay community. It's why when you see some other animal than a horse or dog, you usually get a human penis. I think that most furries these days at least only make animal people because it's exotic and it fits the established convention. There's tons of monster/alien porn out there and there's a huge overlap between those circles. Furries just have dedicated conventions where tons of autistic prison-gay losers go to give each other HIV (they even have multiple testing rooms at some cons).

tl;dr it's not because they're furry, it's because they're gay and autistic and in large numbers so of course they commit horrible sex crimes.

If you don't believe me, look up "sashabelle"s art in a mega link on U18chan. Guy was a gay cub rape artist and turns out he had unreleased drawings of him brutally raping dogs in front of horrified houseguests. He's one of the bigger or mid-sized gay artists. Goes by @sethpup on twitter and FA, he could probably fill you in on how this stuff works.

zoophilia and zoosadism aren't exclusive to gay people. a whole genre of zoosadism is women crushing animals to death.

and meanwhile in the Jasonafex thread, "Man's Best Friend With Benefits"...


although i do question why you just happened to stumble upon "gay cub rape art" in an art dump, ignoring that, i think you might have a hard time pushing your agenda here.

 

[psychoparrot]

zoophilia and zoosadism isn't exclusive to gay people. a whole genre of zoosadism is women crushing animals to death.

and meanwhile in the Jasonafex thread, "Man's Best Friend With Benefits"...


although i do question why you just happened to stumble upon "gay cub rape art" in an art dump, ignoring that, i think you might have a hard time pushing your agenda here.

I'm sorry to hear that your misunderstanding of my post seems to have offended you on a personal level. I never implied that this was exclusive to gays, just that it's consistent with the seedier side of the gay community that furries are intimately connected with and probably isn't related to the animal motifs that they happen to be using.

I didn't "randomly come across and art dump", I had heard that he had recently wiped a bunch of accounts and the U18chan thread gave a partial explanation. As I said, he's a relatively decent sized non-cub artist too, news gets around

 

[Nasty]

To be fair, I’ve certainly seen an overlap with “puppy play” and zoophilia. While I once saw “puppy play” as an interesting and creative form of BDSM, too many of those guys were found to overlap into zoophilia and I view it as a big red flag now.

 

[Danger Mouse]

You're close to right, but it's not the animal elements generally speaking. You'll run into severely autistic guys who think their dogs are in love with them, but I think that the majority of the bestiality going on is tied to common themes in the seedier parts of the gay community. It's why when you see some other animal than a horse or dog, you usually get a human penis. I think that most furries these days at least only make animal people because it's exotic and it fits the established convention. There's tons of monster/alien porn out there and there's a huge overlap between those circles. Furries just have dedicated conventions where tons of autistic prison-gay losers go to give each other HIV (they even have multiple testing rooms at some cons).

tl;dr it's not because they're furry, it's because they're gay and autistic and in large numbers so of course they commit horrible sex crimes.

If you don't believe me, look up "sashabelle"s art in a mega link on U18chan. Guy was a gay cub rape artist and turns out he had unreleased drawings of him brutally raping dogs in front of horrified houseguests. He's one of the bigger or mid-sized gay artists. Goes by @sethpup on twitter and FA, he could probably fill you in on how this stuff works.

Only at fur cons where barebacking orgies are the norm. More like Midwest Fuck-Fest.



I'm not checking the Mega link I don't want to be any more horrified.

 

[Strine]

Gays are certainly at the cutting edge of fetishism, but I don't think being attracted to male humans makes you likelier to fuck a dog. Sex crimes - which this is - are committed by a heterosexual majority, because heterosexuals are the majority. Saying only fags would do this stuff is letting a lot of dogfuckers off the hook.

 

[Sintharia]

Only at fur cons where barebacking orgies are the norm. More like Midwest Fuck-Fest.


I'm not checking the Mega link I don't want to be any more horrified.

Barebacking orgies aren't exclusive to the furry community. It's a thing in the gay community as a whole. Surprise; you get a bunch of gay guys together in a fandom and it's gonna happen in that fandom, too. The testing advocacy that occurs at cons was born out of that because it's also a thing at Pride events.


On topic, this is a new one:

https://twitter.com/thermitegf/status/1060386804359032833 | https://archive.fo/ffEHl

Scrolling through the account's timeline, I'm not certain the poster is serious, but wow.

 

[psychoparrot]

Gays are certainly at the cutting edge of fetishism, but I don't think being attracted to male humans makes you likelier to fuck a dog. Sex crimes - which this is - are committed by a heterosexual majority, because heterosexuals are the majority. Saying only fags would do this stuff is letting a lot of dogfuckers off the hook.

Just gonna throw out those magic words "per capita" and let the gay question lie for now.

Bestiality is definitely a bigger issue than just them, which is honestly more concerning. You expect people who can't conceive to come up with perverse parodies of conception. If it's happening in the rest of society there's a real problem, proportions aside.

 

[TheWatchfulFurfag]

Just gonna throw out those magic words "per capita" and let the gay question lie for now.

Bestiality is definitely a bigger issue than just them, which is honestly more concerning. You expect people who can't conceive to come up with perverse parodies of conception. If it's happening in the rest of society there's a real problem, proportions aside.

I think part of is is the "Feels good, is good" culture of many.

 

[HolyBeast]

I’m late, but whatever.

While I try to be open-minded understand some people may use kinks to cope with trauma and I can’t stop people from drawing gross shit, it’s a fatass red flag for me if you’re drawing fetishized kid rape for yourself and others to get their jollies off too. Same with animals.

I get drawings aren’t reality and sometimes people use traumatic themes to cope with their own issues, but fetishizing kid rape and animal abuse is a big “no” for me. Fiction may not be reality but I wouldn’t let you within a mile of a kid or an animal if I found out you pound it out to art of lolicon and feral art.

And considering people like Kero and Sniff can’t contain their vile interests in fantasy, I feel pretty justified in my stances.

 

[Danger Mouse]

Gays are certainly at the cutting edge of fetishism, but I don't think being attracted to male humans makes you likelier to fuck a dog. Sex crimes - which this is - are committed by a heterosexual majority, because heterosexuals are the majority. Saying only fags would do this stuff is letting a lot of dogfuckers off the hook.

I agree there are lots of cases of females charged with bestiality with dogs, it's not exclusively a male thing.

 

[Vertebraille]

i disagree. it's a full-blown red flag if someone is consuming drawn porn of something normally illegal/immoral in reality.

if someone consumes art of legitimate children/animals being raped, they have a serious problem and need to get professional help before it becomes everyone else's problem.

I guess it depends on what the porn is, I honestly don't totally disagree with you. My brain just has trouble reconciling when my heart is saying "THIS IS FUCKING BAD ALWAYS THESE PEOPLE ARE MONSTERS GET RID OF THIS TERRIBLE SHIT" and my head saying "wait I hate censorship though".

I mean I had a partner with with non-immoral/illegal fantasy but that they insisted they never wanted to take part in in reality even after I told them I'd be ok with it so I guess that was my sort of demonstration that someone CAN have a fantasy that they don't want to realize. However, if they did, it wouldn't have changed their moral standing in society I guess so it was super low-stakes anyway so maybe it's not worth the risk to allow drawn depictions of ACTUALLY HARMFUL fantasies?

I have trouble with this question as you can see, I'm glad I'm not any kind of law-maker.

EDIT: I absolutely do not disagree that if someone consumes art of kids or animals being raped they need professional help, I'm right there with you on that, it's allowing it to exist that I get wishy washy about.

 

[Shibe]

Another Kero supporter is heartbroken.

View attachment 591938

https://twitter.com/KyroFoxxie

Glad to see Kyro finally jumped ship (sort of.) Hope he's actually being genuine and not just admitting how maybe he might be guilty because he knows how bad it would look to keep his head in the sand now that there's multiple videos of Kero

Spoiler

He was already brought up at least once before, but don't know if this dumbass whiteknight Kyro Fox is of any importance or not. He's one of the people that thinks he's a genius for proving that screenshots and HTML can be edited and was more than happy to let people volunteer to have him do it to their messages but doesn't want to address the fact that old original messages were forwarded that are linked to Kero's account, and has deleted comments on FB and blocked people for politely asking him to prove that can be done. He retweets all the garbage from Ashley Zoe and Kit Killovarras, and is very proud of the fact that he proved Kero is innocent because he can't be seen in any of the videos.

Seems to be a good buddy of Kero's, since he scolded everyone because "you all probably don't even personally know Kero." Might just be a dumb desperate friend/fanboy in denial but wouldn't really be surprised if he has a guilty conscience.

http://archive.is/5eE1r
http://archive.fo/d9DMB
http://archive.is/ZXO1M
http://archive.fo/2M4Zv

also, hey, didn't know Kero unlocked his Twitter