Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

Would you rape Jess Phillips


  • Total voters
    2,415
Sargon has 14,5k likes on his last video and 214k views. Keep hating, he's making dimes.
How many subs does he have by now though? It doesnt seem like his subscriber engagment is as high as it used to be.... I cant imagine why.
his numbers are cratering, for a channel with 900,000 subs, 214,000 views is a pretty pitiful number. it's only going to go down from there. i give it another six months tops before he's in tj kirk territory
To be fair, almost no YouTuber's viewer retention is very good.
the difference is that sargon takes himself very seriously and watching him decline even as his ego continues to balloon will be very entertaining. i don't recall pewdiepie ever doing any grandstanding about how he was going to save the west by making youtube videos
 
Is Sargon actually going through with ‘Jim made Terry Davis kill himself’ as a talking point now that the groomer allegations have been turned into jokes? Amazing. I can’t see this not working out well, considering that a few days ago there happened to be a certain neckistani choker.

His attempt at summoning twitter support to get Jim kicked off twitter can’t help but reek of Hello, Jim 2.0, specifically in terms of this oh so highly intellectual attack ending up backfiring on Sargon.
I see a few possible scenarios.

1. This is just an attempt to kick Jim off the site now that he dodged Vee’s goading into saying mean and bannable things and didn’t bite the bait about him being an optics cuck - as per Vee, apparently, a person who self-censors for any reason whatsoever.
This attempt will backfire when the numerous bits of evidence of Not Sargon being, in fact, Sargon are brought to twitter support by Jim’s vengeful fans of Sargon’s many detractors and Twitter kicks that oh so awful alt-righter off the platform. Or don’t, if as per usual Twitter doesn’t do anything.

2. This is the next step in their 4d chess master plan. Consider that while occasionally Vee on Twitter and Sargon and Vee on stream have confirmed that Not Sargon is, in fact, Sargon, this account has several times referred to Sargon in third person as if it’s some moronic skeptic unable to keep up a character. I don’t remember the account itself saying that it is Sargon, but even if that happened, there is a fair chance Twitter doesn’t do shit.
If Jim isn’t knocked off the site, business carries on as usual since this is just more of Carl being Carl.
If Jim is knocked off the site, Carl gets to gloat.
If Jim isn’t knocked off the site, but Carl is, or both are gone, the skeptics victoriously whine to Twitter that it isn’t Sargon that uses the account, it’s in fact Shitrat or someone else eager to fight Jim on Twitter. How they do this is beyond me since I don’t know how does Twitter check if an account is in use by someone who was banned already on their first account. There they get to gloat as theoretically Carl’s account is restored, and Jim’s gone, or isn’t but Carl’s is, showing everyone that skeptics were just liars and merely pretending to be exceptional.

3. This is Sargon being Sargon and they don’t have a master plan nor are actually expecting this to work, but just are trying to troll Jim as gracefully as a bulldozer plowing through a Palestinian village.

Which one do you think it is, and how long until this weird deplatforming attempt backfires on Carl?
All three are correct in some sense, in their circles they have been festering with a resentment towards Jim and anon culture so they have begun to become increasingly more spiteful and willing to deplatform or at the very least encourage behavior that would put Jim at risk of getting kicked off youtube. And if Jim engages in behavior that happens to get him kicked off then they can say he did it to himself.
It comes across as trolling because thats the guise they want to put it under so that they can maintain some way of saying there was no ill intent (its just a joke bro). However if you look at how Vee and Sargon's rhetoric has shifted it looks like they're trying to build a narrative so they can't just say its a joke in earnest.

Another thing to get the noggin joggin by the way, anyone else wonder why Sargon shifted to talking about a targeted harassment campaign around the same time him and his pals have been giving some nudges towards Jim getting fucked by the TOS? Or why Kraut has a discord server collecting screenshots of /cow/ flagging videos? And oh hey, it looks like one of youtube's big TOS rules is no harassment and bullying. Its almost as if they're priming their audiences to accept a justifiable narrative of Jim being a bully and therefore deserving to be kicked off the platform.
Totally not deplatforming him themselves, just heavily suggesting it and sympathizing with it.
 
Last edited:
All three are correct in some sense, in their circles they have been festering with a resentment towards Jim and anon culture so they have begun to become increasingly more spiteful and willing to deplatform or at the very least encourage behavior that would put Jim at risk of getting kicked off youtube. And if Jim engages in behavior that happens to get him kicked off then they can say he did it to himself.
It comes across as trolling because thats the guise they want to put it under so that they can maintain some way saying there was no ill intent (its just a joke bro). However if you look at how Vee and Sargon's rhetoric has shifted it looks like they're trying to build a narrative so they can't just say its a joke in earnest.

Another thing to get the noggin joggin by the way, anyone else wonder why Sargon shifted to talking about a targeted harassment campaign around the same time him and his pals have been giving some nudges towards Jim getting fucked by the TOS? Or why Kraut has a discord server collecting screenshots of /cow/ flagging videos? And oh hey, it looks like one of youtube's big TOS rules is no harassment and bullying. Its almost as if they're priming their audiences to accept a justifiable narrative of Jim being a bully and therefore deserving to be kicked off the platform.
Totally not deplatforming him themselves, just heavily suggesting it and sympathizing with it.

I was gonna say that narrative shift was because they're all gay homosexuals. Not knocking your theory, but that would require a level of forward planning and strategy than none of them have shown the slightest aptitude for
 
I was gonna say that narrative shift was because they're all gay homosexuals. Not knocking your theory, but that would require a level of forward planning and strategy than none of them have shown the slightest aptitude for
Right and its not like one of them had a discord server where they planned to do exactly that against the alt right. Or had an elaborate plan to involve other youtubers to join their crusade against the evil Nazi trolls. Yeah that definitely is not something we've seen before.
Kraut Tilly Law.jpg

Kraut OP mincemeat.png
 
Carl keeps grooming these kids with a single mother, vee = single mother, kraut = single mother, shitrat = single mother, the kekistani killer = single mother, etc.
When will he stop, when will he cease to take advantage of these kids that lack a father figure, why does he always wants to be the stepfather?
 
Right and its not like one of them had a discord server where they planned to do exactly that against the alt right. Or had an elaborate plan to involve other youtubers to join their crusade against the evil Nazi trolls. Yeah that definitely is not something we've seen before.View attachment 596537
View attachment 596539

I see your point. I mainly wanted to get it on the record that they're all gay homosexuals
 
Carl keeps grooming these kids with a single mother, vee = single mother, kraut = single mother, shitrat = single mother, the kekistani killer = single mother, etc.
When will he stop, when will he cease to take advantage of these kids that lack a father figure, why does he always wants to be the stepfather?

It's not single mother homes that breed serial killers and rapists. It's Sargon
 
Is Sargon actually going through with ‘Jim made Terry Davis kill himself’ as a talking point now that the groomer allegations have been turned into jokes? Amazing. I can’t see this not working out well, considering that a few days ago there happened to be a certain neckistani choker.

His attempt at summoning twitter support to get Jim kicked off twitter can’t help but reek of Hello, Jim 2.0, specifically in terms of this oh so highly intellectual attack ending up backfiring on Sargon.
I see a few possible scenarios.

1. This is just an attempt to kick Jim off the site now that he dodged Vee’s goading into saying mean and bannable things and didn’t bite the bait about him being an optics cuck - as per Vee, apparently, a person who self-censors for any reason whatsoever.
This attempt will backfire when the numerous bits of evidence of Not Sargon being, in fact, Sargon are brought to twitter support by Jim’s vengeful fans of Sargon’s many detractors and Twitter kicks that oh so awful alt-righter off the platform. Or don’t, if as per usual Twitter doesn’t do anything.

2. This is the next step in their 4d chess master plan. Consider that while occasionally Vee on Twitter and Sargon and Vee on stream have confirmed that Not Sargon is, in fact, Sargon, this account has several times referred to Sargon in third person as if it’s some moronic skeptic unable to keep up a character. I don’t remember the account itself saying that it is Sargon, but even if that happened, there is a fair chance Twitter doesn’t do shit.
If Jim isn’t knocked off the site, business carries on as usual since this is just more of Carl being Carl.
If Jim is knocked off the site, Carl gets to gloat.
If Jim isn’t knocked off the site, but Carl is, or both are gone, the skeptics victoriously whine to Twitter that it isn’t Sargon that uses the account, it’s in fact Shitrat or someone else eager to fight Jim on Twitter. How they do this is beyond me since I don’t know how does Twitter check if an account is in use by someone who was banned already on their first account. There they get to gloat as theoretically Carl’s account is restored, and Jim’s gone, or isn’t but Carl’s is, showing everyone that skeptics were just liars and merely pretending to be exceptional.

3. This is Sargon being Sargon and they don’t have a master plan nor are actually expecting this to work, but just are trying to troll Jim as gracefully as a bulldozer plowing through a Palestinian village.

Which one do you think it is, and how long until this weird deplatforming attempt backfires on Carl?
I'd say it's all of the above. Shit's been going downhill for Sargon ever since his debate with Richard Spencer. Murdoch Murdoch made a cartoon about him, his Hello Jim stream blew up in his face, the BBC effectively chased him away from UKIP, his baby died, and recently he got his shit pushed in by a couple of feminists he was hoping to dunk on. It doesn't help that Jim has been there to shit on him for most of those things (Vee's gay ops with the dead baby flat lined) and somehow I get the feeling Sargon secretly blames him for his misfortunes.

As for how long it'll take for this to backfire on Carl, not very long. A while back, Destiny went on a tirade saying he would try to get people he didn't like deplatformed. And that backfired on him faster than Wile E. Coyote getting his hands on a stick of dynamite.
 
Carl keeps grooming these kids with a single mother, vee = single mother, kraut = single mother, shitrat = single mother, the kekistani killer = single mother, etc.
When will he stop, when will he cease to take advantage of these kids that lack a father figure, why does he always wants to be the stepfather?

I mean, they call him the stepfather for a reason.


Is Sargon actually going through with ‘Jim made Terry Davis kill himself’ as a talking point now that the groomer allegations have been turned into jokes? Amazing. I can’t see this not working out well, considering that a few days ago there happened to be a certain neckistani choker.

Why'd he even bother making up such stupidly transparent lies? Just watching the video would suffice to prove him wrong, as it was rather sympathetic towards Mr. Davis.

Sarg'n, you're really not as smart as you think you are.
...actually, scratch that. Sarg'n, you're even dumber than your enemies insinuate; Spencer's assessment of your intellect was way too generous.
 
I mean, they call him the stepfather for a reason.




Why'd he even bother making up such stupidly transparent lies? Just watching the video would suffice to prove him wrong, as it was rather sympathetic towards Mr. Davis.

Sarg'n, you're really not as smart as you think you are.

...actually, scratch that. Sarg'n, you're even dumber than your enemies insinuate; Spencer's assessment of your intellect was way too generous.

I don't even know why he's putting in effort on this. Jim has proven repeatedly that he's more than capable of getting himself banned from twitter
 
I don't even know why he's putting in effort on this. Jim has proven repeatedly that he's more than capable of getting himself banned from twitter
And if anything taking Twitter away from Jim will just give him more time to shit on skeptics. Bad optics and a shitty outcome, just all around a bad play.
 
Why'd he even bother making up such stupidly transparent lies? Just watching the video would suffice to prove him wrong, as it was rather sympathetic towards Mr. Davis.
Some people unironically think that if they just do what propaganda and lies genius Goebelles did without any of the spark, the talent and the energy the man had that they'll get the same result: people will believe the lie spoken often enough.

Sadly, if you're not a propaganda genius, you just look like a moron chanting GROOMER GROOMER GROOMER.
optics cuck
The weirdest part is that as per Vee, optics cucking refers to censoring something for whatever reason. That's a direct quote from him.
The unanswered question of 'why call it optics cucking if it doesn't have an actual relation to optics by default' really makes my sputnik go beep-beep, I gotta admit. It's almost as if it's called 'optics cucking' because you want to portray the person accused of it as someone who cares about optics as they censor themselves to avoid twitter nuking.
 
The optics cuck insult is dumb because not caring about optics is what did in the alt-right (where the term comes from).

Not optics-cucking is a discredited position. It would be like calling someone a globe-cuck for believing in a round Earth.

Ok, but hear me out here: is it dumber than anything else Vee or Carl say?
 
Back