Disaster Twitter bans misgendering and deadnaming in pro-trans move - The troon ride never ends

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/11/23/twitter-misgendering-deadnaming-trans/
Twitter has prohibited misgendering and deadnaming on its platform in an effort to curtail anti-trans abuse.

The social media company has changed its rules to ban the practices and has warned that any user who deliberately targets a trans person in these ways may face permanent suspension.

These offensive techniques—which involve using the wrong gender to refer to a trans person or a trans person’s old name—are often used on Twitter to insult and erase trans people’s identities and right to exist.

In Twitter’s updated terms of service, the company states: “We prohibit targeting individuals with repeated slurs, tropes or other content that intends to dehumanise, degrade or reinforce negative or harmful stereotypes about a protected category.

“This includes targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”

The move, which was made in late October but only broadly noticed on the platform on Friday (November 23), also involved adding a section in which Twitter acknowledges that LGBT+ people suffer abuse online more than most.

“We recognise that if people experience abuse on Twitter, it can jeopardise their ability to express themselves,” the paragraph begins.

“Research has shown that some groups of people are disproportionately targeted with abuse online.

“This includes; women, people of colour, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual individuals, marginalised and historically underrepresented communities,” it continues.

“For those who identity [sic] with multiple underrepresented groups, abuse may be more common, more severe in nature and have a higher impact on those targeted.”

The social media giant has also created a new section of its terms of service, called “Consequences,” in which explains the actions it is pledging to take against offenders.

Twitter has promised to permanently suspend any account which either breaks the rules too many times or is “engaging primarily in abusive behaviour.”

Users who are “deemed to have shared a violent threat” will also be banned from the platform, the company has stated.

Many Twitter users have praised the change, which they hope will lead to more abusive accounts being suspended or banned completely.

One tweeted: “nb deadnaming and misgendering are now prohibited on Twitter. which is very good news!”

Another said: “Excellent news everyone: Twitter has finally updated their TOS such that misgendering/deadnaming a trans person is against the site’s rules. Happy hunting.”

“I was skeptical (because it’s twitter) but yeah, the TOS is pretty clear. Repeated misgendering and/or deadnaming is specifically listed. Excellent,” tweeted yet another fan of the policy shift.

However, there was also hesitancy from many who doubted that the changes in Twitter’s terms of service would be enforced when abusive users were reported.

One such user wrote: “Good start. We’ll have to see if reporting is meaningful or the policy enforced.”

Another tweeted: “like they’ll ever enforce it seriously.”

And a different user commented: “apparently twitter updated its rules to specify that targeted deadnaming and misgendering of trans people isnt allowed but im calling it now that they wont enforce this rule.”
Somebody ought to tell Jack that 1984 wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual
 
A judge recently ruled that the POTUS twitter is not allowed to block anyone. It's being used as a notification system for official government shit...things are getting blurry.

It's kind of the public square now. If you get banned across major platforms for using a deadline you can't really be heard online.

I want to see them ban Trump for deadnaming some shitty troon sex criminal. Then I want to see Trump buy it and fire all these cocksuckers.
 
CALL ME A PRETTY DAINTY PRINCESS WOMAN OR BE BANNED FROM TWEEETER!
jake-alley-secretgamergirl-jpg.188235

77oBvt3.png

aN6Coyb.png
Wu would have to admit to being trans, Jake would have to admit to being Jake (which is his legal name not a dead name) and Phil doesn’t really use twitter. So all of them say “yes this is a good move” but can’t actually protect themselves. Twitter will just say “ok prove it, scan an ID and submit name change papers” like Facebook does already
 
If you're not savvy enough to instantly know someone's gender identity through their Twitter account then you must be a fucking dehumanizing Nazi Russian bot bigot who should be banned anyway.
honestly it generally is pretty easy to tell real women from fake women on twitter. look for clues like anime avatars, a bio that says they're a software developer, and mentioning they sell sex pics.
 
Wu would have to admit to being trans, Jake would have to admit to being Jake (which is his legal name not a dead name) and Phil doesn’t really use twitter. So all of them say “yes this is a good move” but can’t actually protect themselves. Twitter will just say “ok prove it, scan an ID and submit name change papers” like Facebook does already

They won't do that, they'll just believe anything a troon says. Also troons are obsessed with those blue checkmarks so have already doxed themselves to Nazi Jack.
 
Twitter will just say “ok prove it, scan an ID and submit name change papers” like Facebook does already

It's what Twitter does already in respect of doxing. The woke crowd has complained about it at length in the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alec Benson Leary
A judge recently ruled that the POTUS twitter is not allowed to block anyone. It's being used as a notification system for official government shit...things are getting blurry.

It's kind of the public square now. If you get banned across major platforms for using a deadline you can't really be heard online.
still not seeing where its the government enforcing a no deadname policy in this case.

gotta be honest, i dont see the problem from twitters standpoint, and if i ran twitter, i would probably ban a lot of the people deadnaming, too. not because of personal philosophy, but it makes more sense from a business standpoint.

think about it. why do people deadname? it pisses off trannies and gives ammo for other people that are in slapfights with trannies. basically it just creates a bunch of grief, is probably a source of a few percentage points of reports they receive daily, and pisses off a pool of users and their allies. same thing with misgendering. Let's be honest here, that's why its done in most cases and even in cases where its a genuine effort to inform about "abusive men in dresses", the outcomes the same.

there really isn't a good reason for twitter, a publicly traded company to not have such a policy and it is silly to insinuate that the government is involved.
 
This is probably not going to happen, but "Drumpf" would fall under harassing based on protected category of national origin. Any use of "Drumpf" on twitter should result in a ban. It is a form of targeted harassment.
any form of harassment toward anyone other than troons is a-ok. maybe racism against black people is bad, but if that black person made fun of troons then it's okay.
 
there really isn't a good reason for twitter, a publicly traded company to not have such a policy and it is silly to insinuate that the government is involved.

Other than that if every other shitty little group of 0.1% or less of the population just throws a fit about their own hobbyhorses to force the other 99.9% to kowtow to their bullshit, twitter is just going to end up a hive of genderspecials and other shitbags and be openly hostile to normal people who don't want to navigate that minefield.

Oh no, shitposters will have to take 5 extra minutes to register a new account.

Most of those accounts just get ignored because unless you've verified with a cell phone the account is in some weird status. Your hardcore safe spacers already just autoblock anyone with fewer than whatever number of tweets or followers.

Troons who don't are just going out of their way to find shit to be offended by.
 
gotta be honest, i dont see the problem from twitters standpoint, and if i ran twitter, i would probably ban a lot of the people deadnaming, too. not because of personal philosophy, but it makes more sense from a business standpoint.

From a business standpoint the only relevant question is whether they will gain or lose users as a result of this policy. While the woke crowd want a platform on which only other woke people have a voice, that's unlikely to be a viable business model (Twitter only turned a profit for the first time last year) in the longer term.
 
[faget writing faget thing]
Twitter's policies are becoming unworkable as a global platform. Eventually it will crush itself under its own weight. Twitter protecting certain groups more than others will only lead to more complaints and more actions to quell any ability to do anything on the platform. Twitter cannot extend specific protections that one group asked for without doing it for other groups. A footsball club has @redskins, which violates policy. You could argue that Mormon porn sites and anti-Scientology groups also violate the policy. What does Twitter do in these situations? Does it say "go jump in a lake" to the Mormons and Scientologies while banning people for mocking trannies or insulting the prophet? Where does Twitter step in to stop legal speech that is not actually harmful to anyone?
 
Back