Disaster Twitter bans misgendering and deadnaming in pro-trans move - The troon ride never ends

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/11/23/twitter-misgendering-deadnaming-trans/
Twitter has prohibited misgendering and deadnaming on its platform in an effort to curtail anti-trans abuse.

The social media company has changed its rules to ban the practices and has warned that any user who deliberately targets a trans person in these ways may face permanent suspension.

These offensive techniques—which involve using the wrong gender to refer to a trans person or a trans person’s old name—are often used on Twitter to insult and erase trans people’s identities and right to exist.

In Twitter’s updated terms of service, the company states: “We prohibit targeting individuals with repeated slurs, tropes or other content that intends to dehumanise, degrade or reinforce negative or harmful stereotypes about a protected category.

“This includes targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”

The move, which was made in late October but only broadly noticed on the platform on Friday (November 23), also involved adding a section in which Twitter acknowledges that LGBT+ people suffer abuse online more than most.

“We recognise that if people experience abuse on Twitter, it can jeopardise their ability to express themselves,” the paragraph begins.

“Research has shown that some groups of people are disproportionately targeted with abuse online.

“This includes; women, people of colour, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual individuals, marginalised and historically underrepresented communities,” it continues.

“For those who identity [sic] with multiple underrepresented groups, abuse may be more common, more severe in nature and have a higher impact on those targeted.”

The social media giant has also created a new section of its terms of service, called “Consequences,” in which explains the actions it is pledging to take against offenders.

Twitter has promised to permanently suspend any account which either breaks the rules too many times or is “engaging primarily in abusive behaviour.”

Users who are “deemed to have shared a violent threat” will also be banned from the platform, the company has stated.

Many Twitter users have praised the change, which they hope will lead to more abusive accounts being suspended or banned completely.

One tweeted: “nb deadnaming and misgendering are now prohibited on Twitter. which is very good news!”

Another said: “Excellent news everyone: Twitter has finally updated their TOS such that misgendering/deadnaming a trans person is against the site’s rules. Happy hunting.”

“I was skeptical (because it’s twitter) but yeah, the TOS is pretty clear. Repeated misgendering and/or deadnaming is specifically listed. Excellent,” tweeted yet another fan of the policy shift.

However, there was also hesitancy from many who doubted that the changes in Twitter’s terms of service would be enforced when abusive users were reported.

One such user wrote: “Good start. We’ll have to see if reporting is meaningful or the policy enforced.”

Another tweeted: “like they’ll ever enforce it seriously.”

And a different user commented: “apparently twitter updated its rules to specify that targeted deadnaming and misgendering of trans people isnt allowed but im calling it now that they wont enforce this rule.”
Somebody ought to tell Jack that 1984 wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual
 
Y'know, I just want to say something right now.

We were fucking right all along.

Women started saying predators were already infiltrating this movement, that a lot of them were seriously fucked-up perverts who only wanted to be women to wear a skinsuit made of them, that men would use this to harass and assault and rape women, and that these activists were a lot closer to "men's rights" in terms of their priorities than anything that would have been recognizable as a leftist cause 10 years ago.

Every attempt to put brakes on this train has failed. When women said, ok, but could we keep some gatekeeping on this shit, so that obvious perverts wouldn't use it to create plausibly deniable peeping scenarios?, that was transphobia. Perverts would be caught and dealt with, and besides, men can assault or peep even without using trans as an excuse, so why would anyone go to the trouble?

When something like Yaniv happens, all the shit anyone ever said about how abuses of the new system would be halted and punished is revealed as complete puffery. There couldn't be a more obviously avaricious, loophole-seeking, low-effort, depraved human being trying to take advantage of self-identification, misgendering, and deadnaming rules. But tech companies, media outlets, all of them kowtow to an abomination of a man who's such a caricature he could have been a viable false flag for the TERF cause.

I don't believe in conspiracies and I don't think transgender shit is one. But I literally don't think debauched, twisted men could have come up with a better way to openly leer at women, then cry about it if they're called out, even if they'd been formally conspiring. People have just been so eager to be on the "right side of history" that they've turned off their critical faculties.
 
People have just been so eager to be on the "right side of history" that they've turned off their critical faculties.
And by extension, ironically enough, let the oppressors win.

We’ve culturally beaten ourselves back to square one, and the consequences of doing so are well-deserved.
 
Square one? What history books have you been reading? Deserve? From who? On whose behalf? I deserve no punishment for something I pushed against from the get go.

Look, normal people have some amount of attachment to any given activist group, and the LBGTQRPPT one has been cheating by adding more and more groups they're being activists for. Because you're either an evil nazi trump supporter or a sane person, you're stuck either giving lip service to the trans nonsense, or being a trump supporting cross burning islamophobe.

Normal people also don't think much about shit like this. It's a team sport, they don't care if the ball crossed the foul line, they want their side to win.

Although it appears that way, normal people don't generally recognize a dude in a dress swinging his dick around to be a woman. The more they push based on that assumption the more normal people are going to say "Wait a second, WHAT? This is what I've been agreeing with?!?"
 
1.png


So Jack, will you be falling on your sword now?
 
Back