Zoosadist Joshua Hoffman / Kero the Wolf / Radiance / Hakan Yote / BestYotie / KeroYamimora / Yami the Wolf

Feeding live animals to dogs fits his MO. Joshua used to interact with a Twitter account who force fed their dogs live fish. There was a screencap in the Fear and Loathing in the Furry Fandom video. Does anyone know if the tweet was archived?
View attachment 605121

Well, I can't archive the tweets because his account is protected but I was able to see his replies to Stormysvore, but not theirs since their account is also protected. If I remember right, Stormysvore made RL vore content (citation needed.)

Stormysvore made a comment on their Twitter bio about 'no zoophiles and zoosadists welcome', which is denouncing Kero and Co I suppose.
IMG_20181201_203911_253.jpg


It's mostly useless, but there's some hypocritical statements.

IMG_20181201_203855_764.jpg IMG_20181201_203857_840.jpg IMG_20181201_203902_318.jpg IMG_20181201_203905_684.jpg IMG_20181201_203908_446.jpg IMG_20181201_203909_589.jpg
 
Ah ye you can definitely tell from the likes and responses that that account is just someone taking the piss

https://archive.is/kKN2h
Jesus Christ. If this really is Kero, he may actually have gone mad. After everything that happened, this guy says PUBLIC ALLY he's looking to adopt a beagle. Beagles are the most recognizable cute pupper on the planet, there will be someone who may try to straight up kill him.
Edit: Tis a troll, but still, if some nutter sees this and believes Kero might do it, we may have a dead dog fucker to laugh at soon.
 
Well, I can't archive the tweets because his account is protected but I was able to see his replies to Stormysvore, but not theirs since their account is also protected. If I remember right, Stormysvore made RL vore content (citation needed.)

Stormysvore made a comment on their Twitter bio about 'no zoophiles and zoosadists welcome', which is denouncing Kero and Co I suppose.
View attachment 605409

It's mostly useless, but there's some hypocritical statements.

View attachment 605404 View attachment 605405 View attachment 605406 View attachment 605407 View attachment 605408 View attachment 605410

Nothing says "I'm for animal rights" like making your dog swallow live mice and then shoving your dick down his throat.
 
i didn't see it mentioned in the OP, so my apologies if it has already been brought up in this thread elsewhere. kero also has a ferzu account (furry dating website) that has been active semi-recently (1 month ago)

https://www.ferzu.com/Member/Details/KerotheWolf (need an account to view, can't archive afaik)

WQRY9om.png
2.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png

not much there but i figured i'd post about it since it has been active not too long ago. didn't screenshot all his posts, most of them are just random.

edit: almost missed this caption on one of the images. two years old but ehh info.

image.png
 
Last edited:
The only raise for concern is whether or not anything will even happen to kero. Nothing has happened except for more humiliating info being publicised, and his reputation flowing ever more down the toilet, his reputation being destroyed is good, but not good enough, he has to be arrested for his accusations to finally be real to these degenerates, him being arrested nails the coffin, and proves to everyone who stuck with him that he was indeed, a dog fucker
 
The only raise for concern is whether or not anything will even happen to kero. Nothing has happened except for more humiliating info being publicised, and his reputation flowing ever more down the toilet, his reputation being destroyed is good, but not good enough, he has to be arrested for his accusations to finally be real to these degenerates, him being arrested nails the coffin, and proves to everyone who stuck with him that he was indeed, a dog fucker
It’s been stated numerous times before, but the legal system is anything but swift. SnakeThing is still going through the process currently, and I wouldn’t be shocked if Kero is somewhere in the early stages so far if there is something at all currently. If not, give it more time. It sometimes takes years for this shit to get even off the ground.
 
The deeper the rabbit hole goes with these sick fucks, the more and more I start wondering on what mental gymnastics do these sick fucks do with their claims that they "love animals"
The most common are:
- animals can consent or revoke consent at will (wrong)
a.) even if they cannot verbally consent, then ~body language~ is enough (wronnnggg)
- all animals are sexual beings the same way humans are (wrong, even if very few other species partake in "pleasure" sex, i.e. dolphins, doesn't make it permissible to fuck one)
a.) since the animal will respond physically to genital stimulation, then the animal obviously likes it !!!!11!!!1111
b.) because an animal at sexual maturity would be fucking other animals anyways, it's okay for them to fuck it too
c.) interspecies sexual contact happens in nature (what they fail to account for here is that it is often the product of stress or abnormal circumstances)
- fucking animals has no negative physical or psychological effects on the animal (covered extensively in ZSMT and Spink's thread that this is, indeed, wrong)
- animals are sapient and cognizant in the same way humans are (they misuse the word "sentient" in making this point, and also, wrong)
a.) denying this "fact" is "speciesism" and is a byproduct of humans placing animals lower on the ladder
- depriving animals of sex is detrimental to their health and abusive (um. wrong?)
- humans eat/hunt/work animals, so fucking them is okay (at this point I don't think I need to make notes that all this stuff is wrong, it's pretty obvious)
a.) eating/hunting/working is far more exploitative than fucking them, gaiz
b.) being crazy PETA offshoots makes them real animal welfare activists, so they're justified in fucking animals because they "do good" for them
- because ancient Greeks/Celts/Japanese/whatever did it too
- they have a "special bond" with the animal being molested that ~~~~~only they~~~~~~ can ever comprehend, have a dog/horse whisperer delusion
- sex is natural and the rest of the world are zoophobic puritans, just like the people who hate gays

A funny take related to a couple of these is "how do you know they DON'T want it?". By that logic... how do you know they DO? With an ounce of critical thinking and a basic moral compass, all of these justifications fall apart like wet newspaper.
 
Last edited:
a.) since the animal will respond physically to genital stimulation, then the animal obviously likes it !!!!11!!!1111
while all of their mental gymnastics are really stupid, this particular point that they make is REALLY stupid.

sexual arousal and orgasms are autonomic reflexes. it happens when the body responds to physical stimulation. Animals including humans can't control this very well.

at some point you've probably heard the odd-sounding-at-first-look factoid that a lot of rape victims orgasm during rape. That's because sexual arousal and orgasm are reflexes, not because the victim is enjoying themself.

imagine a human raping another human and then saying, "well, it's okay, they were aroused! they orgasmed! it's fine!" that would be super fucked up. It's the same with animals.
 
while all of their mental gymnastics are really stupid, this particular point that they make is REALLY stupid.

sexual arousal and orgasms are autonomic reflexes. it happens when the body responds to physical stimulation. Animals including humans can't control this very well.

at some point you've probably heard the odd-sounding-at-first-look factoid that a lot of rape victims orgasm during rape. That's because sexual arousal and orgasm are reflexes, not because the victim is enjoying themself.

imagine a human raping another human and then saying, "well, it's okay, they were aroused! they orgasmed! it's fine!" that would be super fucked up. It's the same with animals.
Especially fucked when you remember a vagina gets wet to protect itself more than anything. It's not evidence that she wanted it, it's an automatic response to external stimuli
 
The most common are:
- animals can consent or revoke consent at will (wrong)
a.) even if they cannot verbally consent, then ~body language~ is enough (wronnnggg)
This argument takes me back to the Jack Harkness Rules of "Can I Fuck It?" every time. If it cannot clearly, verbally, and with full understanding give consent, you don't have consent to fuck it.
 
The most common are:
- animals can consent or revoke consent at will (wrong)
a.) even if they cannot verbally consent, then ~body language~ is enough (wronnnggg)
- all animals are sexual beings the same way humans are (wrong, even if very few other species partake in "pleasure" sex, i.e. dolphins, doesn't make it permissible to fuck one)
a.) since the animal will respond physically to genital stimulation, then the animal obviously likes it !!!!11!!!1111
b.) because an animal at sexual maturity would be fucking other animals anyways, it's okay for them to fuck it too
c.) interspecies sexual contact happens in nature (what they fail to account for here is that it is often the product of stress or abnormal circumstances)
- fucking animals has no negative physical or psychological effects on the animal (covered extensively in ZSMT and Spink's thread that this is, indeed, wrong)
- animals are sapient and cognizant in the same way humans are (they misuse the word "sentient" in making this point, and also, wrong)
a.) denying this "fact" is "speciesism" and is a byproduct of humans placing animals lower on the ladder
- depriving animals of sex is detrimental to their health and abusive (um. wrong?)
- humans eat/hunt/work animals, so fucking them is okay (at this point I don't think I need to make notes that all this stuff is wrong, it's pretty obvious)
a.) eating/hunting/working is far more exploitative than fucking them, gaiz
b.) being crazy PETA offshoots makes them real animal welfare activists, so they're justified in fucking animals because they "do good" for them
- because ancient Greeks/Celts/Japanese/whatever did it too
- they have a "special bond" with the animal being molested that ~~~~~only they~~~~~~ can ever comprehend, have a dog/horse whisperer delusion
- sex is natural and the rest of the world are zoophobic puritans, just like the people who hate gays

A funny take related to a couple of these is "how do you know they DON'T want it?". By that logic... how do you know they DO? With an ounce of critical thinking and a basic moral compass, all of these justifications fall apart like wet newspaper.

Don't forget "it's okay because the dog is fucking me"
 
...........well I certainly chose an interesting time to check back on KF.

I'd like to offer the slimmest of silver linings to this abhorrent mess: several people have expressed shock & dismay that 1) Kero still has defenders/"fans" and 2) these fans are mostly young teens. If you perceive adolescents as Adults But Greasier, this paints a fucking grim picture of where society's headed.

However, you may recall that the fanbase for child abuse profiteers DaddyOFive were also mostly tweens/early teens. It's not that Kids These Days will grow up to be sociopathic garbage people, it's that they haven't finished neurologically developing. Over the last decade, multiple studies have shown that empathy isn't fully developed until the brain hits the mid-twenties.

So, we've got that going for us. Which is nice.
 
Back