Random Tumblr posts

deargod.JPG

Dear Lord in heaven

BUT THEN
Capture.JPG


AND IT GOT EVEN WORSE
Capture 2.JPG
 
https://purge-anti-antis.tumblr.com

I don't need to repost anything of this person blog that so paranoid of what people jack off to(mainly women) and fiction in general.
This reads like one of those “trans mlm” Tumblrinas who’s projecting so hard she spontaneously grew a dick that plays PowerPoint presentations whenever she mentally madturbates to the thought that she’s sticking it to those damn dirty shippers.

Normally I hate how Tumblr/SJW feminists have turned this phrase to mean “anyone I disagree with” but if there was anything that could be called internalized misogyny, it would be this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Feline Darkmage
The tumblr Lesbian Loop. "More lesbian characters should be femme and butch is a stereotype and if you disagree you're homophobic" clashing with "More lesbian characters should be butch as the majority of lesbians are butch and its more representative and making them femme is becoming a stereotype of its own in the media and if you disagree you're homophobic." Both cancelling each other out.

Tumblr will never be happy, ever.
 
To be fair, anyone that wants to be like Holden Caulfield is probably a massive tool.

True, but I've never seen anyone (at least in my lifetime) want to be a Holden Caulfield. Maybe they can relate to their struggles, but I've never seen someone try to BE them. Maybe someone out there does...and then maybe they learn about how huge of a dick they would be.

The point I'm trying to make is that liking a """"problematic"""" character doesn't automatically make you a tool. That line of thinking is just as ridiculous as saying all fiction = reality. We can sympathize with certain characters, but that doesn't make you a bad person.
 
True, but I've never seen anyone (at least in my lifetime) want to be a Holden Caulfield. Maybe they can relate to their struggles, but I've never seen someone try to BE them. Maybe someone out there does...and then maybe they learn about how huge of a dick they would be.

The point I'm trying to make is that liking a """"problematic"""" character doesn't automatically make you a tool. That line of thinking is just as ridiculous as saying all fiction = reality. We can sympathize with certain characters, but that doesn't make you a bad person.

Mark David Chapman wanted to be Holden Caulfield, didn't he?
 
Mark David Chapman wanted to be Holden Caulfield, didn't he?

He also thought he was Moses and Jesus at different times. He was nuts.

Still, anyone who thinks Holden Caulfield is to be emulated is probably an asshole themselves, because Holden Caulfield was an asshole.
 
:late:but does anyone know what 'war' they are 'fleeing from'?
cause as far as i'm aware, there are a grand total of 0 (zero) active conflicts in the americas right now.
I think it's mostly because of poverty and gang/cartel violence, not so much nation vs. nation conflict. They might be conflating Central Americans with Muslim migrants, which demonstrates how misinformed their politics are.
 
View attachment 623408

I've seen woman worship Bonnie and Clyde..you know..criminals, but if a man like a piece of fictional work it must mean he's a piece of crap, I guess. Double Standard much?
Oh yes because no woman has ever had the hots for some fictional antagonistic bad boy character that would be ill-advised to associate with in real life, right?
 
Proof using big words doesn't make you smart.
Yeah man I felt like I was reading a schizophrenic word salad
ETA:
Capture.JPG


Bet miss r/iamverysmart wouldn't do the same for a man who killed his abusive girlfriend because they'd see it as "excessive force". Like the poor bastard on reddit whose psycho wife murdered his children.
 
Last edited:
Back