Inactive Deeker - The Diaperman Devoted to Diaperboys

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
CalmMyTits said:
I would report this to DA, but at this point I wouldn't even bother. I've filed reports on pieces of "art" that are blatant violations of the rules several years ago yet these pieces of "art" still remain, so I have the feeling that reporting Deeker would be a futile effort. DeviantART now really lives up to its name nowadays... though now it should be DEVIANTart, instead of the other way around.
Click to expand...

DA seems to give exactly two shits about underage protagonists. Case in point, Bleedman. He literally drew a picture of three characters that are supposed to be ten or twelve, and he drew them as such, dressed up in Playboy Bunny costumes. And it made it to the front page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sixuglymidgets
wVb8kn6.png
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, Meowthkip and Watermelon1337
Piga Dgrifm said:
View attachment 9614
Click to expand...

But... but... I don't even... ugh. So they just stay at home shitting themselves for life while their sisters mock them? What if they want to get married and have a normal life and all that? What if the sisters want the same? I don't think they'd want a creepy middle aged man in a diaper around their children. That would give a new meaning to the term "funny uncle"
 
  • Optimistic
  • Horrifying
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, Mr. Awesome Man, Duke Nukem and 1 other person
Seeing as how Deeker thinks that all boys (even if they're men) should "sublimate" their sexuality into their diapers, not women, theoretically no one has children. I use the term "sublimate" very loosely since I think it's supposed to have a positive connotation, and this sure as hell ain't positive.

For all the thought and effort he seems to put into this, he hasn't really thought it through completely.

Also, there's still not enough :cryblood: in the multiverse for this.

Someone could ask him about reproduction, I suppose, but I sure as hell am not that someone. The mere knowledge that this guy exists is distressing enough, the thought of attempting to contact him directly makes my flesh crawl.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, Trombonista, Mr. Awesome Man and 2 others
Bridechu said:
DA seems to give exactly two shits about underage protagonists. Case in point, Bleedman. He literally drew a picture of three characters that are supposed to be ten or twelve, and he drew them as such, dressed up in Playboy Bunny costumes. And it made it to the front page.
Click to expand...

It's not just that, I've reported plenty of other stuff like for example, art theft. FREAKING ART THEFT THAT IS STILL UP. I've also reported some disturbing images of underage characters in explicitly sexual situations from other people on DA and that shit is still up as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sixuglymidgets
MarineTrainedTard said:
Seeing as how Deeker thinks that all boys (even if they're men) should "sublimate" their sexuality into their diapers, not women, theoretically no one has children.
Click to expand...

No, no, he's got this all figured out! This is a few paragraphs down from the section where he claims that he's not describing a cult:
Deeker's Cult Manifesto said:
In the Deekerverse, a select group of boys live their lives such that they are completely indulgent of their diapers (...) The reason I say that the Deekerverse only applies to “select boys” is because I recognize that if all boys went around in diapers all the time then they would not be recognized as being different or special from the ordinary boys. Only an arbitrarily small percentage of boys and their Sisters in the Deekerverse are recognized as Deekerians by their continuous devotion to their diapers. The rest of the world sees them as freaks, but they do not care.
Click to expand...

The last sentence, at least, is quite true.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista
Randall Fragg said:
No, that looks so bad it's funny. There is nothing funny about Reeker, only eternal, unrelenting horror.
Click to expand...

It's actually a really creepy, unsettling movie. I mean, it is from the 70's and therefore a bit cheesy, but I would recommend it.

Captain Pronin said:
That movie was both tragic and terrifying at the same time.

inb4 late
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: sixuglymidgets and Jaimas
You know, I used to have a DA account, but I never really used it. I was going to suggest being the forum's undercover operative and feeding you info about his exploits on the site, but I've realized that its a stupid idea, and not really worth it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: sixuglymidgets, Adamska and Meowthkip
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back