- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
The Verita report into the Challenor/Green Party horror is due out today.
Aimee Challenor / Ashton Lucas David Challenor / Aimee Knight - Failed politician, adult baby, son of an adult baby rapist, furry, brony: the troon that killed Reddit.
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
Actual investigation or whitewash, what do we think? Given how woke the Greenies are, I'm guessing the latter because trans people good and orange man bad.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
Here’s the version they’ve released.
https://www.greenparty.org.uk/asset...3eij7Ho7aI8MC7lPyq59cJgEYWwOokgkQmg3aWGMMuuKY
Remember this was due out last november and so it’s likely it’s been redacted, or altered, in response to people having seen it and objected.
Hopefully the full original will be leaked .
https://www.greenparty.org.uk/asset...3eij7Ho7aI8MC7lPyq59cJgEYWwOokgkQmg3aWGMMuuKY
Remember this was due out last november and so it’s likely it’s been redacted, or altered, in response to people having seen it and objected.
Hopefully the full original will be leaked .
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2018
Aimee's Tweet yesterday. Note the mention of a 'ruling made'
Actual report is attached
Actual report is attached
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
First impressions from a quick skim:
1. The threads on here and on mumsnet were far more detailed. Clearly I’m in the wrong industry, if that’s what passes for investigation. I wonder how much this cost? Is it just a summary of a longer report?
2. Aimee gets let off the hook - lots of sentences that seem to have been added in to excuse their behaviour (difficult point of life etc.)
3. I can’t see a ruling
4. Toothless.
1. The threads on here and on mumsnet were far more detailed. Clearly I’m in the wrong industry, if that’s what passes for investigation. I wonder how much this cost? Is it just a summary of a longer report?
2. Aimee gets let off the hook - lots of sentences that seem to have been added in to excuse their behaviour (difficult point of life etc.)
3. I can’t see a ruling
4. Toothless.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
They're whitewashing their own actions in regard to this child molester. It will satisfy nobody and anyone who doesn't want to support sex predators or be associated with them should dump this shitty party.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
It doesn’t even ask (maybe that wasn’t the remit) the important questions.
Why was Aimee allowed to have such influence without challenge?
To what extent were the challenor’s actions allowed simply because they were trans/trans allied?
What are the wider implications for this web of influence - remember similar people are having HUGE influence in Uk politics. Aimee is involved with stonewall, who are going into schools and promoting this shit. Jess ‘blog full of child abuse images and knob pictures’ Bradley has been advising government. Jane fae (proponent of extreme porn and younger actors in it) has been advising the girl guides on safeguardingand ‘trans inclusion.’ Some very unsavoury people are having huge influence in Uk politics with NO due diligence being done. The entire web needs exposing.
Jess, Aimee and others are involved with TELI (is there a thread on that? I’m new here...) which is basically a legal lobby group set up to create legal precedents to further the TRA agenda.
The Challenor case links into a LOT of other people and organisations. Ffs there’s even an academic linked to TELI (prof dunne at Bristol uni) who is arguing for lowering the age ‘trans lids’ Can have gender recognition. Which basically is allowing v young children to consent to affirmative treatment. Which of course opens the door to lowering the age of consent.
This is paedophilic infiltration of the establishment in plain view. It’s like the PIE scandal in the 70s. None of this even benefits the small number of old school transsexuals who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria and generally accepted as not being part of the TRA beast. It’s a nightmare.
Why was Aimee allowed to have such influence without challenge?
To what extent were the challenor’s actions allowed simply because they were trans/trans allied?
What are the wider implications for this web of influence - remember similar people are having HUGE influence in Uk politics. Aimee is involved with stonewall, who are going into schools and promoting this shit. Jess ‘blog full of child abuse images and knob pictures’ Bradley has been advising government. Jane fae (proponent of extreme porn and younger actors in it) has been advising the girl guides on safeguardingand ‘trans inclusion.’ Some very unsavoury people are having huge influence in Uk politics with NO due diligence being done. The entire web needs exposing.
Jess, Aimee and others are involved with TELI (is there a thread on that? I’m new here...) which is basically a legal lobby group set up to create legal precedents to further the TRA agenda.
The Challenor case links into a LOT of other people and organisations. Ffs there’s even an academic linked to TELI (prof dunne at Bristol uni) who is arguing for lowering the age ‘trans lids’ Can have gender recognition. Which basically is allowing v young children to consent to affirmative treatment. Which of course opens the door to lowering the age of consent.
This is paedophilic infiltration of the establishment in plain view. It’s like the PIE scandal in the 70s. None of this even benefits the small number of old school transsexuals who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria and generally accepted as not being part of the TRA beast. It’s a nightmare.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2018
Re 1. I think the attachment here is the exec summary only. The full report is available to party members only.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
Yes it is just the executive summary. Let’s hope someone leaks the rest. Both the initial version and the changes made after review.
This rat king has paws in high places.
This rat king has paws in high places.
Nutty Spunk Gibbon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2018
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
If autism's a big enough disability that it will excuse misconduct whenever you're stressed, perhaps autists should be kept out of all party positions, since they are frequently stressful.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2018
I suspect those perennial dafties, The Greens, saw appointing a Troon as ticking all the boxes, and didn't think for one second about things like aptitude and ability.
Nutty Spunk Gibbon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2018
How ableist of you!/sarc
Honestly though if you're supposedly competent enough to represent an entire minority for a national political party and run for the deputy leadership, you should be competent enough to follow basic safeguarding procedures.
As much as he's obviously a sperg, blaming his autism for this is cowardly as hell, it has nothing to do with autism and everything to do with him being in a toxic relationship with his deviant father who probably abused him so hard he inherited his nappie fetish.
I almost feel sorry for him until I remember how much of a fat duplicitous furry fuck he is.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
Hiding behind autism as well as transgenderism. How nauseating.
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2018
Quick summary:
3.11 suggests police should inform the Green Party about Daddy, but doesn't raise the question of whether the police were in fact aware of Daddy's involvement with the green party
3.13 says 'tina challenor's involvement in the party was minimal', however she was a party candidate! that is surely more than minimal.
3.15 says Aimee found out about the charges from his family, and Aimee did not ask for details. what does 'details' mean? Are we to presume that Aimee knew the identity of the victim and that she was raped by Aimee's Daddy? But the 'details' in terms of doing it in a nappy or whatever are missing? It should be made clear if Aimee knew these two basic facts, why are they being vague? And WHEN did Aimee know? As per the FB caps in the op, Aimee apparently knew in October 2015.
3.16 "Aimee told us that the fact David Challenor had been released on bail was a significant factor in how she perceived the seriousness of the charges as she took it to mean that he was not a threat to society." lol. he had been charged with raping an actual child. There is not much to 'perceive' here.
3.17-3.22 Essentially Aimee is a senior figure in the Green Party & sends a serious safeguarding issue by FB message and does not make clear that the subject of the message is also a member of the Green Party so instead elicits sympathy because the tone of the message is 'my Daddy is a rapist', not 'green party member David Challenor is a rapist'
They refuse to condemn Aimee for firstly failing to adequately communicate the information, and then subsequently giving him an even bigger role within Aimee's Green work.
3.25 "Aimee apologised for appointing David Challenor as her election agent. Doing so was a clear error of judgement." Lol.
3.30 "Aimee Challenor told us that at the time of the events discussed in this report, she was trying to build her relationship with her father and that this explains the actions she took to involve him in the party" = 'My daddy was a child rapist so I blanked & disbelieved the victim, and tried to build relations with Daddy'
3.32 "Aimee does not appear to have considered that it was odd that no-one in the party had come back to her to ask her further details – she simply assumed that no response meant everything was okay." - Aimee was the only one who was aware Daddy was a Green member, and sought to further involve him in the Green Party even after these charges.
3.33 "Reporting restrictions were imposed on 7 November 2016, two days after Aimee Challenor had told Matt Hawkins and Coventry Pride about the charges. Aimee told us that this prevented her from telling more people about the charge" - haha this is a pathetic excuse.
3.37 "Matt Hawkins told us he regrets not asking Aimee Challenor for more details of the charges, and not asking if David Challenor was a member of the party." - tbh there's no reason to assume he was? But maybe Aimee's autism means he assumes everyone else knows the things he knows.
3.42-3.47 Finally gets around to blaming Aimee for everything, but hedges bets a bit by saying party could provide more training for young politicians, and blames Aimee's spergism.
3.50 "we do not understand how she could have had the good judgement to inform officials in the party about the charges that her father faced, but the poor judgement not to make sure that all relevant information was included." - 'We think Aimee is a manipulative liar, but we can't say that outright'
'we accept that Aimee chose not to seek further information about the charges her father faced, but we do not understand why she did not recognise that this was a mistake.' - lol. Aimee knew everything. Dumb-dumbs should read KiwiFarms.
----
----
These dox have just appeared on Twitter, this being court papers from Aimee Challenor trying to silence Andy Healey, and the statement in support of this from Claire Phipps, Chair of the Green Party Executive till November 2017.
The dox are dated April 2017 and were released by Andy himself. https://twitter.com/djandyhealey/status/1083483340685144067
The question is who funded this injunction?
The first page defines acronyms, including 'TERF' and cites two 'non-binary members' of the Green Party in support.
The third page cites a tweet from Aimee 'Blocked another TERF SWERF twitter user. Goodbye @djandyhealey Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Cunt.'. Claire said she offered sympathy to Aimee but 'could never truly understand what it's like' [to be a tranny, the most persecuted minority on earth] to receive 'tweets that invalidate ones identity as a transwoman'. Claire told Aimee to lock down his social media, stop swearing publicly and apologise.' Aimee's reply was 'I'll only apologise if he asks for an apology, and I can't apologise publicly on Twitter, where I insulted him, because I've blocked him' [so unblock him then, dude] 'I may make a complaint about him'
Subsequently Aimee & his LGBTIQ Greens group ganged up to make a complaint against Andy about 'transphobic abuse'
Aimee added 'Andy is being a pain on twitter again' [but I thought you had him blocked, Aimee]
Claire decided that the solution to Andy triggering Aimee, in order to put forward a 'Transwomen are women' motion at the party conference. When this motion was passed, Andy Tweeted 'Gpconf had a choice of pandering to delusions or seeking truth'. This triggered Aimee, hard, and Aimee & the Green Party ended up in court to silence party members criticising their tranny policies.
3.11 suggests police should inform the Green Party about Daddy, but doesn't raise the question of whether the police were in fact aware of Daddy's involvement with the green party
3.13 says 'tina challenor's involvement in the party was minimal', however she was a party candidate! that is surely more than minimal.
3.15 says Aimee found out about the charges from his family, and Aimee did not ask for details. what does 'details' mean? Are we to presume that Aimee knew the identity of the victim and that she was raped by Aimee's Daddy? But the 'details' in terms of doing it in a nappy or whatever are missing? It should be made clear if Aimee knew these two basic facts, why are they being vague? And WHEN did Aimee know? As per the FB caps in the op, Aimee apparently knew in October 2015.
3.16 "Aimee told us that the fact David Challenor had been released on bail was a significant factor in how she perceived the seriousness of the charges as she took it to mean that he was not a threat to society." lol. he had been charged with raping an actual child. There is not much to 'perceive' here.
3.17-3.22 Essentially Aimee is a senior figure in the Green Party & sends a serious safeguarding issue by FB message and does not make clear that the subject of the message is also a member of the Green Party so instead elicits sympathy because the tone of the message is 'my Daddy is a rapist', not 'green party member David Challenor is a rapist'
They refuse to condemn Aimee for firstly failing to adequately communicate the information, and then subsequently giving him an even bigger role within Aimee's Green work.
3.25 "Aimee apologised for appointing David Challenor as her election agent. Doing so was a clear error of judgement." Lol.
3.30 "Aimee Challenor told us that at the time of the events discussed in this report, she was trying to build her relationship with her father and that this explains the actions she took to involve him in the party" = 'My daddy was a child rapist so I blanked & disbelieved the victim, and tried to build relations with Daddy'
3.32 "Aimee does not appear to have considered that it was odd that no-one in the party had come back to her to ask her further details – she simply assumed that no response meant everything was okay." - Aimee was the only one who was aware Daddy was a Green member, and sought to further involve him in the Green Party even after these charges.
3.33 "Reporting restrictions were imposed on 7 November 2016, two days after Aimee Challenor had told Matt Hawkins and Coventry Pride about the charges. Aimee told us that this prevented her from telling more people about the charge" - haha this is a pathetic excuse.
3.37 "Matt Hawkins told us he regrets not asking Aimee Challenor for more details of the charges, and not asking if David Challenor was a member of the party." - tbh there's no reason to assume he was? But maybe Aimee's autism means he assumes everyone else knows the things he knows.
3.42-3.47 Finally gets around to blaming Aimee for everything, but hedges bets a bit by saying party could provide more training for young politicians, and blames Aimee's spergism.
3.50 "we do not understand how she could have had the good judgement to inform officials in the party about the charges that her father faced, but the poor judgement not to make sure that all relevant information was included." - 'We think Aimee is a manipulative liar, but we can't say that outright'
'we accept that Aimee chose not to seek further information about the charges her father faced, but we do not understand why she did not recognise that this was a mistake.' - lol. Aimee knew everything. Dumb-dumbs should read KiwiFarms.
----
----
These dox have just appeared on Twitter, this being court papers from Aimee Challenor trying to silence Andy Healey, and the statement in support of this from Claire Phipps, Chair of the Green Party Executive till November 2017.
The dox are dated April 2017 and were released by Andy himself. https://twitter.com/djandyhealey/status/1083483340685144067
The question is who funded this injunction?
The first page defines acronyms, including 'TERF' and cites two 'non-binary members' of the Green Party in support.
The third page cites a tweet from Aimee 'Blocked another TERF SWERF twitter user. Goodbye @djandyhealey Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Cunt.'. Claire said she offered sympathy to Aimee but 'could never truly understand what it's like' [to be a tranny, the most persecuted minority on earth] to receive 'tweets that invalidate ones identity as a transwoman'. Claire told Aimee to lock down his social media, stop swearing publicly and apologise.' Aimee's reply was 'I'll only apologise if he asks for an apology, and I can't apologise publicly on Twitter, where I insulted him, because I've blocked him' [so unblock him then, dude] 'I may make a complaint about him'
Subsequently Aimee & his LGBTIQ Greens group ganged up to make a complaint against Andy about 'transphobic abuse'
Aimee added 'Andy is being a pain on twitter again' [but I thought you had him blocked, Aimee]
Claire decided that the solution to Andy triggering Aimee, in order to put forward a 'Transwomen are women' motion at the party conference. When this motion was passed, Andy Tweeted 'Gpconf had a choice of pandering to delusions or seeking truth'. This triggered Aimee, hard, and Aimee & the Green Party ended up in court to silence party members criticising their tranny policies.
Last edited:
accenttepid
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2019
I don't know why anyone would want to read 80 pages about this, but here you go.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2018
This was Ashton/Aimee back in 2013 when he went with his parents to he Royal Courts of Justice to try to pursuade a judge that he should be allowed back home.
And a special bonus pic if I can get the fucking thing to work. Ashton when he went to protest at companies who avoid tax. Quite the rebel in his camp and V mask. Effect somewhat spoiled by being there with his Ma.
And a special bonus pic if I can get the fucking thing to work. Ashton when he went to protest at companies who avoid tax. Quite the rebel in his camp and V mask. Effect somewhat spoiled by being there with his Ma.
Attachments
Last edited:
Nutty Spunk Gibbon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...TomEtQJ6eC9EvHIEhzUHMo9J283O3R11RegcLlriQn9-k The Guardian has done a write up.
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2019
Didn't one of the half siblings that where pre-Challenor also "transition"? Munchausen Mama?
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
The only thing sadder than him being called a 'rising star of the Greens party' is that it looks like it's actually true.
When that's your calibre of rising star, you really shouldn't be standing candidates of any kind.