🐱 People are mad about ‘Ghostbusters’ again

CatParty
https://www.dailydot.com/parsec/new-ghostbusters-sequel-backlash/

Director Jason Reitman revealed on Tuesday that he was called to direct and co-write an upcoming new Ghostbusters movie that follows the original 1984 film directed by his own father, Ivan Reitman, Entertainment Weekly reports. “Finally got the keys to the car,” Jason tweeted.

But before you can say “who ya gonna call?” the backlash percolated online.

In a few months, Sony Pictures plans to begin shooting the film slated for a summer 2020 release, with the older Reitman as producer this time.

“This is the next chapter in the original franchise. It is not a reboot. What happened in the ‘80s happened in the ‘80s, and this is set in the present day,” Jason told EW. “We have a lot of wonderful surprises and new characters for the audience to meet,” he continued.

It’s too early to tell who’s part of the cast, who will be the new characters, and what the plot will be about. However, it’s also highly unlikely the original actors like Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, and Ernie Hudson will star.

Meanwhile, Jason has reportedly “begun testing teenagers for four mystery roles,” according to sources, says Variety. Sources cited by the Hollywood Reporter even went so far as to say he’s looking to cast two boys and two girls. The project was supposedly so covert, the studio even used fake title “Rust City” to “keep the news under wraps until plans were ready to be unveiled,” Varietyadds.

One thing’s for sure, according to EW: It won’t be related to Sony Pictures’ 2016 all-female Ghostbusters reboot directed by Paul Feig, and which starred Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones, Kristen Wiig, and Melissa McCarthy.

Even with very little information about the new installment in the famous franchise, already, Tuesday’s announcement of a Ghostbusters “sequel” did not sit well with users on Twitter for different reasons.

For starters, a lot of people are disappointed the all-female reboot is not slated for a sequel.

upload_2019-1-16_8-6-52.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-9.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-21.png

What upsets some is how it appears that Ghostbusters’ producers are pandering to people (read: sexist males and other haters) who didn’t want the all-female reboot in the first place, and who will then consider this “winning”:

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-50.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-8-4.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-8-17.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-9-23.png


As to be expected, a lot are calling this reboot unnecessary, and even self-proclaimed fans of the entire Ghostbustersfranchise are among them. As @gracerandolph tweets, “So what if it’s in the same ‘universe’?! If new #Ghostbusters doesn’t star #BillMurray #DanAkroyd #ErnieHudson #SigourneyWeaver … nobody cares.”
The only apparent good news this time around: At least the backlash to the latest installment isn’t as sexist.

As a Ghostbusters fan since childhood, I’ll leave this here: “The Ghostbusters universe is big enough to hold a lot of different stories,” Reitman told EW. I daresay truly devoted fans will watch any iteration of this classic.
 

https://www.superherohype.com/news/...ers-teaser-for-jason-reitmans-new-film-debuts

Only a day after it was announced that Academy Award nominee Jason Reitman (Up in the Air, Juno) will be directing and co-writing a new Ghostbusters movie, the first teaser for the film has been released. Check out the haunting teaser below (via EW), which features the original Ecto-1!


“I’ve always thought of myself as the first Ghostbusters fan, when I was a 6-year-old visiting the set. I wanted to make a movie for all the other fans,” Reitman told the outlet. “This is the next chapter in the original franchise. It is not a reboot. What happened in the ‘80s happened in the ‘80s, and this is set in the present day.”

Sony Pictures will release the film in the summer of 2020 and are aiming to begin production later this year.

“We have a lot of wonderful surprises and new characters for the audience to meet,” Reitman said, not yet indicating if any of the cast members from the original films will appear. Reitman did indicate that the new movie will not pick up from where the previous Ghostbusters movie in 2016 ended.

It will be a passing of the torch both inside and out,” Ivan Reitman added. “It was a decision he had to come to himself. He worked really hard to be independent and developed a wonderful career on his own. So I was quite surprised when he came to me with Gil and said, ‘I know I’ve been saying for 10 years I’m the last person who should make a Ghostbusters movie, but…I have this idea.’ Literally, I was crying by the end of it, it was so emotional and funny.”

In addition to the new sequel, an animated Ghostbusters movie remains in development.
 
Sadly, yes. Creativity seems to have taken a back seat to trying to tard cum nostalgia out of Gen-X and Millennials.

This is Disney's major release schedule for 2018 and 2019 combined. Disney is literally the largest monopoly of studios and movie houses and has the widest resource pool available for talent and creativity.

There isn't a single new IP on here that hasn't been done before. Arguably, Artemis Fowl is an existing book series and not an original IP, they just bought the rights.

Fz46dTO.jpg


Much like the AAA gaming industry, New IP's are a rarity when the cash cow is nostalgic, familiar universes... seemingly no matter how badly they butcher them.

I remember a lot of advertising for the Nutcracker and the Four Realms, and then it completely disappeared. Was it actually released?

Edit: Nevermind, I found out why it disappeared
Budget:
$120,000,000 (estimated)
Opening Weekend USA:
$20,352,491, 4 November 2018, Wide Release
Gross USA:
$54,810,589, 14 January 2019
 
Reboot or sequel, there's a chance this movie will suck regardless of the genitalia of its actors. If they really wanted to do something with the license, they probably could of played safe and do an animated series.

For fuck's sake, just let the franchise rest.
Although this series reached its shelf-life after its second cartoon, some people can't let it rest when they gotta try and make money off of it while throwing in shit that will pander to whatever groups there are. The tweets bitching about this are laughable and eye-rolling since they pretty much make it sound like they're willing to make the series

I’ve only ever seen the first one. I enjoyed it as a standalone comedy, and I couldn’t figure out why anyone ever thought it should be a franchise.
Dollar signs for Hollywood businesses and producers. That's enough for them to try and get more than one film.

LMAO Bob is salty as fuck.
His salty ass tweet may as well be one of the best of the worst tweets one could find on a social media hugbox. Since his tweet is all part of some bitching about the movie having four males, the thought that they simply have four mystery roles without mentioning the sex of the characters flies high over their heads.
 
Tuesday’s announcement of a Ghostbusters “sequel” did not sit well with users on Twitter for different reasons.
So basically nobody of any real importance. Gotcha.

For starters, a lot of people are disappointed the all-female reboot is not slated for a sequel.
Imagine unironically liking Ghostbusters 2016.
What upsets some is how it appears that Ghostbusters’ producers are pandering to people (read: sexist males and other haters) who didn’t want the all-female reboot in the first place, and who will then consider this “winning”:
Read: faggots and cunts are assmad that this movie isn't pandering to them, and instead appeals to "sexist males and other haters".

Also...

>unironically quoting Bob Chipman.

The only apparent good news this time around: At least the backlash to the latest installment isn’t as sexist.
But of course. Because you could only hate Ghostbusters 2016 because you hate women. Obviously.

I’ve only ever seen the first one. I enjoyed it as a standalone comedy, and I couldn’t figure out why anyone ever thought it should be a franchise.
Because it made money.
 
I suddenly need a "Madea's Ghostbusters", directed by Tyler Perry, produced by Tyler Perry and starring Tyler Perry in my life.
Holy shit, I think you're onto something there. I would accept that, and I might even go to see it. Nobody would know what the fuck to make of it.

Of course, it would be terrible, but... eh
 
It's almost like everyone forgets about Ghostbusters II... with the original cast and everything...... which happened at a time when sequels like that were still novel.
And also sucked.

Trying to make Ghostbusters sequels was always trying to catch lightning in a bottle. It's even obvious in II that Bill Murray didn't want to be there. The whole film was also watered down to appeal to kids so they could sell toys and the then-imminent cartoon.
 
And also sucked.

Trying to make Ghostbusters sequels was always trying to catch lightning in a bottle. It's even obvious in II that Bill Murray didn't want to be there. The whole film was also watered down to appeal to kids so they could sell toys and the then-imminent cartoon.
You shut your whore mouth. He is Viggo the Carpathian. And give me pink slime, a dancing Statue of Liberty and some good ol Jackie Wilson any day.
 
Four teenagers you say? Sounds like Extreme Ghostbusters
View attachment 640922

Look at that D I V E R S I T Y.

2 boys and 2 girls? Well if it had to be any of them, the one in the black one is going to get gender-flipped. Hollywood loves black wimmins.

But for real though, holy shit that salt. Can we just make a new IP, or is my generation entirely devoid of creativity?

Extreme may have been diverse, but at least everyone was still a character first and not a transparent agenda-pusher.

I think it's one of the better entries into the GB franchise, to be honest.
 
And also sucked.

Trying to make Ghostbusters sequels was always trying to catch lightning in a bottle. It's even obvious in II that Bill Murray didn't want to be there. The whole film was also watered down to appeal to kids so they could sell toys and the then-imminent cartoon.

Hey, at least Ghostbusters 2 has this scene.

 
If that bit about them casting teenagers for (what I assume will be) the leading roles is true, then I get the feeling that they're going to go for a Stranger Things vibe. Shit, that was probably the elevator pitch that got this greenlit in the first place.

"It'll be Ghostbusters mixed with Stranger Things! Because that was a show that people talked about a lot two years ago!"
 
Extreme may have been diverse, but at least everyone was still a character first and not a transparent agenda-pusher.

I think it's one of the better entries into the GB franchise, to be honest.

If i remember correctly, i think there was a lot of banter between Eduardo and Garrett (the guy in the wheelchair), proving that he wasn't just a token character defined by a disability, like you said, the cast may be diverse, but i'm pretty sure if this cartoon aired today, it would trigger a lot of people, since the show made a couple of jokes about Garrett being in a wheelchair
 
Back