Furry Fandom and Drama General

Furry Youtuber gets into drama:
Essentially he made a video defending
lolicon and cub porn and it was so shitty it lead to a negative response and him pulling the video and making this apology almost immediately.
 
Last edited:
Furry Youtuber gets into drama:
Essentially he made a video defending
lolicon and cub porn and it was so shitty it lead to a negative response and him pulling the video and making this apology almost immediately.

Well would you look at that
ab.png
It's almost as if nonces attract more nonces
 
Furry Youtuber gets into drama:
Essentially he made a video defending
lolicon and cub porn and it was so shitty it lead to a negative response and him pulling the video and making this apology almost immediately.
I watched the original video before he took it down. His points summed up to that Loli, Shorta, and Cub porn was okay because it was fictional but he would murder you if you touched a real child. It was basically the whole usual argument summed up in one though he then went on to say drawn child porn was legal in the united states. I wonder what his thoughts would have been if someone pointed out Shadman (A person he said made good points on this argument and linked a video too) drew porn of an actual child. Beyond Shadman he also shouted out Korthorix and a video he did.
In this video the idiot thought his video would get praise and he got devastated when people got rightfully pissed off.

Edit:
Looked at his inkubunny favorites, he's really into Sonic
Screenshot (43).png
 
Last edited:
Well here is his statement on cub porn and lolicon:
View attachment 644786

They always use that as a scapegoat: "It's fictional, thus it won't happen in real life!"
Sure, people with no humane compass that jack it to underaged shit may not be a pedo, but I'm saying there's a good hundredfold chance that they may be one in intention.
And association, they always forget about the power of association, no one in their sane mind would rep that behavior.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Catch Your Breath
My philosophy on it: it’s not worth crucifying someone over that shit unless it’s like shadman where he drew a real kid, is realistically depicted, or is violent. However, I’d keep an eye on them for liking or drawing that shit and a hand on the phone ready to call the FBI if you see something suspicious.
 
Last edited:
An FA artist with almost 18k watchers posted a journal announcing that they'll be drawing new content including incest, graphic rape and bestiality going forward in the new year and it's starting to be discussed a bit over on Twitter.

Journal in question and the current comments:

screencapture-furaffinity-net-journal-9021625-2019-01-21-12_00_24.png screencapture-furaffinity-net-journal-9021625-2019-01-21-12_03_59.png
https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/9021625/
http://archive.li/8XOyK

Twitter thread, and apparently the artist's spouse is an "incest illustrator":

Screen Shot 2019-01-21 at 12.15.38 PM.png Screen Shot 2019-01-21 at 12.21.17 PM.png hm.jpg Screen Shot 2019-01-21 at 12.23.50 PM.png
https://twitter.com/Smatterbrain/status/1087378440163155968
http://archive.li/q1yhZ
 
Here's someone I didn't see around here. She goes by Maude-draws on deviantart and is of course a degenerate furfag and the thing with her is that she likes to blame everyone who doesn't like the degenerate shit she is into all "SJW TUMBLR MEANIES >:< Desu" and can be a total fucking weeb and thinks the entirety of the internet is okay with her pedo loving shit cause she likes to brag about he "Neopet forum days" like she's some kind of internet vet/expert. And loves to bring it up anytime she gets on Deviantart, Tumblr, Inkbunny and all the other sites she has been a part of.
meet_the_artist__by_maudedraws_dbhdb9k-fullview.jpg

She lacks any self awareness on how stupid her logic is and her will opinions never hold in a real debate.
Plus she claims to be oh so "Morally superior UwU" and SMRT but she can't even be bothered to do a simple grammar check of her god damn spelling.
auoceu.png

and her ability to understand things really show in her work aswell Ex. this journal {archive}
This shit would never hold out in a actual argument about critical thinking. Cause obviously if you get off to Taboo subject like babies being raped any normal person would look at you like a psycho and not let you near your children. What does she possibly mean b y this anyway? Even if you do like such degenerate things why share it online with other equally degenerate people? Yeah you might find some people who won't do it but this is the internet fuck nugget it ain't sunshine and rainbows where people understand the difference between reality and fiction.
qzvctd.png
She is naive at worst but what do I expect from someone who literally thinks like a child and RP cub porn on F-list. (and yes she rps cub shit.) That's where this character comes in
22708675@400-1487897559.jpg
Though I don't know where to find where she said she rp'd as this little girl on F-list but I remember it was somewhere on her old Tumblr is where she said it.

Remember if you say drawing naked little boys being raped that means you are a big ol' meany "SJW" and you are not as evolved and smrt and open minded as she is.

So TL;DR she blames everyone of being a moral fag and and complains non-stop at any chance she gets and that she's been on the "Interwebs for a long time" I.E. having Neopets experience for some dumb ass reason.
She is basically this.
85e.jpg

But if you go to her Inkbunny you can probably see more fur faggotry but as of now I don't even want to look anymore. I got her pegged as much of I can. Basically she made herself a safe place for her degeneracy and crumbles when people challenge her logic. Though her old Tumblr is gone cause of the Tumblr purge and I didn't take the effort to screen cap everything.
 
An FA artist with almost 18k watchers posted a journal announcing that they'll be drawing new content including incest, graphic rape and bestiality going forward in the new year and it's starting to be discussed a bit over on Twitter.

Journal in question and the current comments:

View attachment 644945 View attachment 644947
https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/9021625/
http://archive.li/8XOyK

Twitter thread, and apparently the artist's spouse is an "incest illustrator":

View attachment 644952 View attachment 644957 View attachment 644962 View attachment 644960
https://twitter.com/Smatterbrain/status/1087378440163155968
http://archive.li/q1yhZ
This is nothing new at all to the furry fandom and they're acting like this one individual must be singled out and shamed until they're excommunicated. They're just going to make a martyr of them.

I don't know about you, but I don't personally recall a time when a furry fucked their sister, much less murdered someone and then fucked their eviscerated gut pile because they thought it was "normal". Nobody should give a damn unless its a situation like either PK-- Pkrussl or PurpleKecleon, both using their jobs to get access to kids, or animals, abuse victims, etc, or try to spin a pity party for themselves like Kittery. Having the wrong fetish doesn't make someone dangerous, being an unstable self-centered prick with no respect for life does.

The people going on these violent crusades against them are the cows to me. How much of a dumb sack of bricks do you have to be that you can't tell the difference between a drawing and real life? Nothing they use to back themselves up ever shows causation. They're pseudo-intellectuals deliberately misrepresenting scientific data to push a narrative of purity, and most of the time the very same people have their own fucked up kinks in the skeleton closet as well. Imagine what they must think of themselves if they really believed what they preach is true.
Does smatterbrain not know how common and normal rape fetishes are? Especially among women?
I'm sure they know, they just don't care. Humans and especially women may have been using art as a means of exploring transgressive fantasies since the dawn of time, but it PALES in the face of...a confirmed false story from tumblr that was actually meant to smear bronies? And a clinically insane man trying to copy a loli comic by posing as a fucking radiation inspector. Okay.
:thinking:Really makes ya think.
 
This is nothing new at all to the furry fandom and they're acting like this one individual must be singled out and shamed until they're excommunicated. They're just going to make a martyr of them.

I don't know about you, but I don't personally recall a time when a furry fucked their sister, much less murdered someone and then fucked their eviscerated gut pile because they thought it was "normal". Nobody should give a damn unless its a situation like either PK-- Pkrussl or PurpleKecleon, both using their jobs to get access to kids, or animals, abuse victims, etc, or try to spin a pity party for themselves like Kittery. Having the wrong fetish doesn't make someone dangerous, being an unstable self-centered prick with no respect for life does.

The people going on these violent crusades against them are the cows to me. How much of a dumb sack of bricks do you have to be that you can't tell the difference between a drawing and real life? Nothing they use to back themselves up ever shows causation. They're pseudo-intellectuals deliberately misrepresenting scientific data to push a narrative of purity, and most of the time the very same people have their own fucked up kinks in the skeleton closet as well. Imagine what they must think of themselves if they really believed what they preach is true.

If you're sexually attracted to children, drawings or otherwise, you have a problem.

Whether or not "scientific data" (of which you've cited none) defends jerking off to lolis/cubs/toddlers/children/whatever shouldn't matter in this context—wanting to clean up this content in a community filled to the brim with actual sexual predators.

This position is so confusing. Is it trollshielding when someone makes the implication "I cum to kids but at least I'm not PK"?
 
If you're sexually attracted to children, drawings or otherwise, you have a problem.

Whether or not "scientific data" (of which you've cited none) defends jerking off to lolis/cubs/toddlers/children/whatever shouldn't matter in this context—wanting to clean up this content in a community filled to the brim with actual sexual predators.

This position is so confusing. Is it trollshielding when someone makes the implication "I cum to kids but at least I'm not PK"?
There is a problem with sexual predators in the community but that's because people refuse to kick them the fuck out. How long has Growly been allowed to be here? The man who raped a 14 year old boy in his hotel and took pictures of it with his friend? And already reoffended by grooming kids on FurAffinity? Why has he not been blacklisted from every site and con in existence? Why doesn't every furry know his name to avoid? Why does Dogpatch support reintroducing these people to society? We have a problem not because we have problematic porn but because they know this fandom is a safe-haven for scumbags and as we've found out far more concerned with looking moral than actually protecting the community from proven dangerous individuals.
 
We have a problem not because we have problematic porn but because they know this fandom is a safe-haven for scumbags

You've got this mixed up.

We have problematic porn because this fandom is a safe-haven for scumbags. Eliminate the latter and the former will wither.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mildly_miffed_69
You've got this mixed up.

We have problematic porn because this fandom is a safe-haven for scumbags. Eliminate the latter and the former will wither.
Do you really think that they would leave simply because there wasn't porn to their liking? This is one of the only communities where they're able to get away with such predatory behavior and not be ejected. You don't leave a party just because you don't like the hors d'ourvres.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Frogasm
Do you really think that they would leave simply because there wasn't porn to their liking? This is one of the only communities where they're able to get away with such predatory behavior and not be ejected. You don't leave a party just because you don't like the hors d'ourvres.

I think you've got former and latter confused. In example, if there were no ABDL fetishists in the fandom, we wouldn't be seeing ABDL porn.
 
Do you really think that they would leave simply because there wasn't porn to their liking? This is one of the only communities where they're able to get away with such predatory behavior and not be ejected. You don't leave a party just because you don't like the hors d'ourvres.

I think you misread: eliminate the safe-space and the porn dwindles due to decreased interest from parties who relied on the safe space to congregate

it's funny, I found it refreshing how KF furries at least demonized the kiddie diddlers despite being exceptional degenerates... didn't expect to see an apologist here, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised
 
Back