Kamala Harris to run for president in 2020

(CNN)Kamala Harris announced Monday that she is running for president in 2020, arguing that the time has come to fight against what she views as the injustices of the past two years of the Trump presidency.

In a brief video from her campaign that was released on social media Monday morning at the same time she appeared on ABC's "Good Morning America," Harris called on her supporters to join with her to "claim our future."
"Justice. Decency. Equality. Freedom. Democracy. These aren't just words. They're the values we as Americans cherish. And they're all on the line now," Harris said in the video, teasing her official kickoff in her birthplace of Oakland next Sunday...
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/21/politics/kamala-harris-president-2020/index.html

It continues, with the CNN article praising her. Gag me with a spoon!
 
Its the economy, stupid!
I mentioned before that for all my boundless contempt for Bill Clinton as a person and as a president, he does know how to run a campaign and he does know how to win an election, and at the very fucking least he knows not to directly and openly insult people a campaign desperately needs to vote for him/not vote for the other guy.

The basic principle is trying to make as many people as humanly possible believe that voting for you will offer a tangible benefit to their lives and not take anything they like away, while reassuring everyone that you winning will not negatively impact them in the slightest in order to make people who dont necessarily support you be less interested in voting against you.
 
Last edited:
The only way forward I can really see is if they drop all this shit fast and focus entirely upon the basics economy/services/crime while openly disavowing the worst fringes of left wing batshittery so that Trump will find it less easy to pull the "look at these crazy fucktards on your team!" card, and for the love of jesus stop trying to make defending illegal immigration their flagship issue when literally every fucking demographic is opposed to it.

Running on the economy seems like a really hard sell when it's been doing gangbusters under Trump so far. I mean, you're right, that would be a hell of a lot better than whatever the fuck they're trying to do now, but I don't see how they could put together a platform that both appeals to anyone outside of the coasts, and doesn't boil down to being the Republican platform, but less so.

Also, they have to keep banging the illegal immigrant drum because otherwise how is their demographic prophecy going to come true?
 
Yeah, you guys bring up a good point with the economy at least right now (things can go wrong quickly in a year). Democrats have nothing to run on against Trump other than he's asshole, he's a stooge of Putin somehow, he tried to gut Obamacare, and he's xenophobic. That's pretty much it.
 
Yeah, you guys bring up a good point with the economy at least right now (things can go wrong quickly in a year). Democrats have nothing to run on against Trump other than he's asshole, he's a stooge of Putin somehow, he tried to gut Obamacare, and he's xenophobic. That's pretty much it.

The Dems just put THEE most corrupt and virulently Trump-hating member they have on the Finance Committee in the form of Auntie Maxine, and they assigned her two flunkie lapdogs that are brand noobs, and rabid anti-capitalists.

It's pretty clear that tanking the MAGA economy is a top Democrat priority.
 
Although to be fair the republicans had a clown car situation going on in 2016. Maybe the Dems saw that and thought hey if it worked for them...
Relatively speaking, but when you have only one normal person (Delaney) of the declared candidates so far, who doesn't have the seniority Biden, Bennet, or Brown have, leave it to the Democraps to turn it up a notch, especially with this literal curry nigger.

I mentioned before that for all my boundless contempt for Bill Clinton as a person and as a president, he does know how to run a campaign and he does know how to win an election, and at the very fucking least he knows not to directly and openly insult people a campaign desperately needs to vote for him/not vote for the other guy.

The basic principle is trying to make as many people as humanly possible believe that voting for you will offer a tangible benefit to their lives and not take anything they like away, while reassuring everyone that you winning will not negatively impact them in the slightest in order to make people who dont necessarily support you be less interested in voting against you.
Bill Clinton could have run the best campaign ever, but he still would have lost if it wasn't for H. Ross Perot.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Karl_der_Grosse
Another unlikable liberal menstrator (H/T London Women's Menstrator March). Maybe liberal feminism has ruined your ability to relate?

Look at the leading liberal democrat women, for example:
Hilary Clinton: Old, bitchy, disingenuous shrew
Kamala Harris: Younger, browner version of the above
Moochelle Obama: Horrible, meddling busybody that looks as if she's going to snap if approached; older, browner version of the above
Elizabeth Warren: Likable-looking grandma until she opens her mouth; 1/1024 brown version of the above
 
She's also a Hindu with low brand awareness.

Still, it's going to be funny watching all of these bitches snipe at each other in the primaries.

You're confusing Harris with the other half-Indian, Tulsi Gabbard. Harris attended a southern Baptist church as a kid and will undoubtedly lean on that to appeal to the black demographic.

I mentioned before that for all my boundless contempt for Bill Clinton as a person and as a president, he does know how to run a campaign and he does know how to win an election, and at the very fucking least he knows not to directly and openly insult people a campaign desperately needs to vote for him/not vote for the other guy.

The basic principle is trying to make as many people as humanly possible believe that voting for you will offer a tangible benefit to their lives and not take anything they like away, while reassuring everyone that you winning will not negatively impact them in the slightest in order to make people who dont necessarily support you be less interested in voting against you.

I keep shilling for it, but the funniest thing about Shattered, the first tell-all about Hillary's 2016 campaign, is Bill constantly telling all of her advisers that they're missing the potential of pandering to the economically insecure, only for everyone from Robby Mook to John Podesta to basically say "shut up old man, its not 1992 anymore" and then have Bill inevitably be proven right.
 
With this huge diversity of Democratic President nominees, it'll greatly divide what little chance the Democrats had into a huge mess. First you have Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren for the Native American Demographic, then you have Andrew Yang for the Asian Demographic, then you have Julian Castro (who shares the same last name with Fidel Castro. Makes me wonder if they are related.) for the Hispanic/Latino demographic. Then you have four white candidates to represent the majority of America. Now you have Kamala Harris for the African-American Demographic.

You know for a fact that someone somewhere will get so butt hurt that their candidate "didn't win," that they'll refuse to vote in the 2020 election.
 
The woke crowd, especially black women, don’t support Kamala Harris because...she’s a cop! They actually find her very problematic because she incarcerated a lot of “innocent” black men and didn’t do anything to stop that while a DA in SF.

Every single democrat candidate that has announced is hated by the woke crowd. I don’t see what Democrats will do to overcome that unless they tell the identity politics group to fuck off.
 
Yeah, you guys bring up a good point with the economy at least right now (things can go wrong quickly in a year). Democrats have nothing to run on against Trump other than he's asshole, he's a stooge of Putin somehow, he tried to gut Obamacare, and he's xenophobic. That's pretty much it.

There’s plenty to criticize about Trump. He’s been repealing/ignoring environmental protection laws, has severely strained our diplomatic relationships with other countries, he hires unqualified people to his cabinet, etc. In general, Republican politicians seem to have devolved into a party of corporate cocksuckers who keep covering for the major fuck ups of corporations. The net neutrality debacle is a big example of this.

Democrats have a lot to go on, but they keep focusing on the wrong issues (like illegal immigration, holy shit stop harping on that).
 
There’s plenty to criticize about Trump. He’s been repealing/ignoring environmental protection laws, has severely strained our diplomatic relationships with other countries, he hires unqualified people to his cabinet, etc. In general, Republican politicians seem to have devolved into a party of corporate cocksuckers who keep covering for the major fuck ups of corporations. The net neutrality debacle is a big example of this.

Democrats have a lot to go on, but they keep focusing on the wrong issues (like illegal immigration, holy shit stop harping on that).

Sure, but how are they going to get people to rally behind that? That's the problem. Only a handful of people are going to rally around the repeal of environmental protection laws, the left in general doesn't care about what happens outside the US, and very few regular folk keep track of Trump's cabinet picks. Politically speaking, that is nothing.
 
The woke crowd, especially black women, don’t support Kamala Harris because...she’s a cop! They actually find her very problematic because she incarcerated a lot of “innocent” black men and didn’t do anything to stop that while a DA in SF.

Every single democrat candidate that has announced is hated by the woke crowd. I don’t see what Democrats will do to overcome that unless they tell the identity politics group to fuck off.

Most people outside of CA aren't aware of Harris' tenure as a DA, and if they think she's their future the DNC/Media will absolutely cover that history up.

When have facts and logic stopped socialists and the "woke" crowd?
From what I've seen of the intellectually consistent woke types, AOC is considered obvious controlled opposition. Most of them point to her internship with Ted Kennedy to say she's not actually going to reform anything in the DNC.
 
The Left never seems to understand what to do in order to beat Blumpf. In such a divisive political landscape, their best course of action would be to stop radicalizing and at least try to appeal to the average American voter.

What do they do instead? Push more intersectional oppression nonsense and continue to die on the hill of illegal immigration. That is the issue that cost them 2016 and it will be the issue that costs them 2020.

If they played their cards right, the Democrats could actually be a threat to secure a 2020 presidency. However, their refusal to appeal to on-the-fence voters will cost them greatly.
 
has severely strained our diplomatic relationships with other countries
Such as? Hey, remember when Obama destabilized the ME even further and caused the migrant crisis?
he hires unqualified people to his cabinet,
As opposed to the shitshow that is the entire Democratic party?
Republican politicians seem to have devolved into a party of corporate cocksuckers
This claim is laughable given that most major corporations in the US are progressives and wouldn't be seen dead endorsing Trump (and have actively opposed him). Do you live under a rock?
who keep covering for the major fuck ups of corporations. The net neutrality debacle is a big example of this.
You mean the "net neutrality" that massive corporations like Conde Nast, Google, Facebook and twitter all vocally opposed?
 
Back