- Joined
- May 20, 2016
After Michelle Obama's disasterous school lunches idea, I think a lot of people know what it's like to go hungry because of modern day Democrats' inability to compromise, shutdown or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow Trump can now counter those penguins with his own N-Word pass!
It is an honor to call you MY NIGGA.
Ain't none of you going to starve. They're giving you extra now so you'll have some to save for later.
A lot of them are virtually incapable of that, though. Years of dependency have taught them that living literally paycheck to paycheck (or handout to handout) is the way to do it.
Same thing with all these government workers who claim they don't have a dollar in the bank. If it's true, it's because they realized they had the ultimate job security and decided to not bother saving up any buffer whatsoever in the event that they ever had a big expensive event or lost their job, like normal people try to do. They relied on their never-lose-it job with insane benefits and couldn't even bother to save a hundo here and there in case of something like this. Cry me a river that now they have to live with some uncertainty like the rest of us.
That's not really a bad thing, right?
They don't want to be soldiers who happen to be transgender, they want to be Transgenders In The Military, Suck It Haters We Are Fabulous Gimme The Asspats. And that's at best.Most troons are demonstrably more the type to be spitting on returning soldiers than to ever voluntarily want to fight side by side with them, why should they care about this? Hell, they should be happy that this just means less of them and more cishets are going to die and come back physically and/or mentally mangled
They don't want to be soldiers who happen to be transgender, they want to be Transgenders In The Military, Suck It Haters We Are Fabulous Gimme The Asspats. And that's at best.
That's not really a bad thing, right?
The main reason this is being done is to make the military more effective and cost less, for example if they are deployed into combat there could be a problem delivering their required meds (something similar happened with ADHD meds in the past) which could be more of problem to the trans soldier themselves them the military, there is the cost of transitioning as well which could make them undemployable for some time after the treatment, some can become undemployable because of the meds they take, the military also isn't really obligated to take you in because you have some sort of mental illness, but most importanty, this a pretty new issue thats just hard to work with right now, it was rushed it and was made a thing without really think about it like nothing could go wrong.That's not really a bad thing, right?
The main reason this is being done is to make the military more effective and cost less, for example if they are deployed into combat there could be a problem delivering their required meds (something similar happened with ADHD meds in the past) which could be more of problem to the trans soldier themselves them the military, there is the cost of transitioning as well which could make them undemployable for some time after the treatment, some can become undemployable because of the meds they take, the military also isn't really obligated to take you in because you have some sort of mental illness, but most importanty, this a pretty new issue thats just hard to work with right now, it was rushed it and was made a thing without really think about it like nothing could go wrong.
"The Pentagon was forced to allow transgender applicants to join the military on January 1, 2018, after a federal judge ruled that the military had to allow transgender recruits to join."
This isn't a complete ban either btw
"As always, we treat all transgender persons with respect and dignity. DoD's proposed policy is NOT a ban on service by transgender persons. It is critical that DoD be permitted to implement personnel policies that it determines are necessary to ensure the most lethal and combat effective fighting force in the world. DoD's proposed policy is based on professional military judgment and will ensure that the U.S. Armed Forces remain the most lethal and combat effective fighting force in the world," Lt. Col. Carla Gleason, a Pentagon spokesperson, told CNN."