Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[RumblyTumbly]

But don't lefties hate the military?

Wouldn't they want trangenders to not enlist?

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

In the military, it's important that the soldiers on the ground are able to quickly and effectively analyze their surroundings and situation to determine the best course of action.

People who can't even get the most basic "Things are what they are, not what you say they are" into their heads obviously aren't going to be very effective at getting to the truth of what's going on. And the military seeing a smirking civilian and murdering him would be bad, and as we know, smirks are like 25 murders to these people.

 

[Hatoful Dandy]

So they WANT to have troons sent into countries where the concept of trans acceptance is blasphemous? They'd find out that gravity is NOT their ally should any of them get captured...

 

[JambledUpWords]

So banning trans from the military is a step towards genocide? That doesn’t make any sense. If anything, being in the military makes you more likely get killed. If you’re trans, the suicide rate is high enough already. They don’t let people in the military with high anxiety either. What makes trans so special?

 

[IslamicContentental Belt]

I never did hear a good excuse as to why Trump pulled more than a quarter of the Hispanic vote, though.

I assume that a lot of people of Hispanic descent who are productive, hard working, English speaking, assimilated citizens are tired of getting lumped in with these parasitic drains who are here illegally?

Edit: I didn't read far enough up the thread. I'm late as fuck and will take my clocks.

 

[Diabolic diabetic]

Why would the military let in people know for having 40% of their casualties come from friendly fire?

 

[Puddleduck]

I don't get the "trannies have been serving since the Revolutionary war" thing ... surely back then, they wouldn't have HRT etc so they were effectively just men with long hair and issues?

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

You can't leave out the meltdown either.
View attachment 645915 View attachment 645916 View attachment 645917 View attachment 645918 View attachment 645920 View attachment 645921 View attachment 645922 View attachment 645923 View attachment 645924 View attachment 645925 View attachment 645926

>Trans people have been serving in the military since the Revolutionary War

Man watching them twist themselves into pretzels trying to find their pet demographic in every era of history is always hilarious.

 

[PT 522]

It's fucking ridiculous that people think this is happening just because everyone in the supreme court thinks "trannies r stinky" and there's no reasoning behind it other than that.

 

[8777BB5]

>Trans people have been serving in the military since the Revolutionary War

Man watching them twist themselves into pretzels trying to find their pet demographic in every era of history is always hilarious.

As I told my stupid coworker this morning Deborah Samson wasn’t trans; she just wore men’s clothes because that was the only way she could fight

 

[Adamska]

I don't get the "trannies have been serving since the Revolutionary war" thing ... surely back then, they wouldn't have HRT etc so they were effectively just men with long hair and issues?

>Trans people have been serving in the military since the Revolutionary War

Man watching them twist themselves into pretzels trying to find their pet demographic in every era of history is always hilarious.

I get the feeling these imbeciles are desperately using cases where women disguised themselves as men so they can fight for their country and just calling them trans because of the dress-up routine needed in order for the disguise to work. Kind of like how spergs like to claim random genius scientists as spergs so they can pretend that their mastery of Pokemon, Harry Potter, and Sonic means they're a supergenius too.

Either that or they're making it up to give themselves something to scream about. It's pathetic either way.

 

[OttoWest]

The trans movement laid the groundwork for this kind of decision back in 2013 with their push to reclassify gender identity disorder, a recognized mental illness, with gender dysphoria, which is not considered a mental disorder, in the DSM-V. By turning troonery from a mental health issue into a medical one— and one they demand be treated medically (hormones and surgery)— they effectively screwed themselves in the long term for a short term victory. Either your disorder is mental or it’s physical, you can’t have both.

Next will be the insurance companies.

 

[Tanner Glass]

I don't get the "trannies have been serving since the Revolutionary war" thing ... surely back then, they wouldn't have HRT etc so they were effectively just men with long hair and issues?

It's because they're trying to instill a revisionist history and assume that most people won't bother looking into it.

Deborah Samson wasn't trans, Marsha Johnson wasn't trans, and Sylvia Rivera wasn't trans.

Bruce Jenner wasn't trans when he was an Olympic icon, Bradley Manning wasn't trans when he committed high treason.

There aren't any actual trans heroes so you have to make them up any way you can, and this is just one particular tactic they use to try and normalize it. It's really kind of just a new spin on book burning, by drowning out facts.

Like just compare the revisions from Marsha Johnson's wikipedia pages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marsha_P._Johnson&diff=844301734&oldid=844281160 - June 2018 correctly cites him as a drag queen (which he explicitly identified as in an interview).

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marsha_P._Johnson&diff=805367081&oldid=805366795 - You have to go back to 2017 to find a small section clarifying that Johnson expressly never identified as trans (Despite the first assumption that "Transgender" has existed since the revolutionary war and as someone in that community would probably know what that word means)

If you look now, he's cited as a transgender hero and activist - despite that not being true. Most "normies" aren't going to pull a Kiwi Farms and flip though a few years of wikipedia revisions to watch the tranny-washing happen in real time and he is no longer alive to clarify.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

It's because they're trying to instill a revisionist history and assume that most people won't bother looking into it.

Deborah Samson wasn't trans, Marsha Johnson wasn't trans, and Sylvia Rivera wasn't trans.

Bruce Jenner wasn't trans when he was an Olympic icon, Bradley Manning wasn't trans when he committed high treason.

There aren't any actual trans heroes so you have to make them up any way you can, and this is just one particular tactic they use to try and normalize it. It's really kind of just a new spin on book burning, by drowning out facts.

Like just compare the revisions from Marsha Johnson's wikipedia pages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marsha_P._Johnson&diff=844301734&oldid=844281160 - June 2018 correctly cites him as a drag queen (which he explicitly identified as in an interview).

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marsha_P._Johnson&diff=805367081&oldid=805366795 - You have to go back to 2017 to find a small section clarifying that Johnson expressly never identified as trans (Despite the first assumption that "Transgender" has existed since the revolutionary war and as someone in that community would probably know what that word means)

If you look now, he's cited as a transgender hero and activist - despite that not being true. Most "normies" aren't going to pull a Kiwi Farms and flip though a few years of wikipedia revisions to watch the tranny-washing happen in real time and he is no longer alive to clarify.

It's actually kind of funny, there's historical evidence of homosexuality, there's always stories of flamboyant men and of the eternal bachelors living together never finding women, basically stuff that all but says "these people are gay men" while there's never such stuff for transgenderism.

 

[Sissy Galvez]

It's actually kind of funny, there's historical evidence of homosexuality, there's always stories of flamboyant men and of the eternal bachelors living together never finding women, basically stuff that all but says "these people are gay men" while there's never such stuff for transgenderism.

Didn’t you hear? The Nazis burned the trans history books at the gender institute in Germany! It was the real reason behind WWII.

 

[IV 445]

So banning trans from the military is a step towards genocide? That doesn’t make any sense. If anything, being in the military makes you more likely get killed. If you’re trans, the suicide rate is high enough already. They don’t let people in the military with high anxiety either. What makes trans so special?

This is pretty dark but,

 

[Vorhtbame]

But don't lefties hate the military?

Wouldn't they want trangenders to not enlist?

It's not about being babykilling imperialist genocide monsters; it's about being told "no". And if the last few years have taught us anything about TDS types, the only word that really triggers them is "no".

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

It's not about being babykilling imperialist genocide monsters; it's about being told "no". And if the last few years have taught us anything about TDS types, the only word that really triggers them is "no".

Also under the old system it basically worked like a scam. Trans people could sign up for the military knowing that their transitioning would keep them from being deployed, so they'd get some cushy stateside do-nothing job while the government paid for their treatments, and tossed some college money on top of that. By the time you're finished transitioning, the original length of time you signed up for is done, you don't re-up, and you walk away having effectively bilked the armed forces.

To add on to being told "no", they're furious that one of their avenues of money for nothing has been cut off.

 

[captkrisma]

Also under the old system it basically worked like a scam. Trans people could sign up for the military knowing that their transitioning would keep them from being deployed, so they'd get some cushy stateside do-nothing job while the government paid for their treatments, and tossed some college money on top of that. By the time you're finished transitioning, the original length of time you signed up for is done, you don't re-up, and you walk away having effectively bilked the armed forces.

To add on to being told "no", they're furious that one of their avenues of money for nothing has been cut off.

Another thing to add is that former Sec Def Mattis actually laid out the groundwork for the mass banning of trannies. Mattis pushed out a order to commanders to chapter out anyone who was on non-deployable status for more than 6 months. However, recovery time from any physical profile is the length of the profile or 90 days, whichever comes first. This means that someone going through gender reassignment surgery had to have all surgeries completed and at least be doing PT and attempting to get back in the fight after three months of profile.

Tl;dr: There's no way a troon can have all the necessary surgeries and be back to work within three months.

 

[1Tonka_Truck]

>Trans people have been serving in the military since the Revolutionary War

Man watching them twist themselves into pretzels trying to find their pet demographic in every era of history is always hilarious.

There was a flamboyantly gay Prussian involved in forming the revolutionary army. When I say flamboyant, Liberace took notes.