- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
My hot take of the day: Edward is a palette swap of Philthy Phil, even has the exact insane delusions of leadership and non-stop gun posing photos. 
Discuss.
Discuss.
Emily Gorcenski / Edward J. Gorcenski - Basically John Rambo and BJ Blazkowicz combined but as a tranny antifa (trantifa?)
- Thread starter Deezy
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2018
Gain access to TERF spaces? The TERFs are already quite cautious after they got doxed by some crazy cat lady.
https://twitter.com/theonlysprout/status/1017420590486048768
Also James Billingham/Block Bot (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/mac-harrison-kilgoresprout.19251/page-4 https://kiwifarms.net/threads/block-bot.19878/) already does dox TERFs, as do a bunch of other troons.
The problem with doxing terfs, that Edward doesn't seem to grasp, is that it's not actually illegal to think that he is not a woman (ok maybe in Canada?).
So you dox the TERFs, and then what? murder them?
J
JB 236
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Dox TERF, post on Twitter, get followers to attempt to ruin career/life
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
Oh god, these twitter threats remind me of Sam Ambreen at her craziest. Makes sense, both are pro trans, antifa and hate Glinner.
I bet he's just an internet tough guy who won't do shit in real life and acts like this only on twitter.
I bet he's just an internet tough guy who won't do shit in real life and acts like this only on twitter.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2013
Charlottsville? What is wrong with that area? Dud someone spite the water 30 years ago?
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
It’s not that women are terrified of transwomen, Ed, you pillock. It’s that what you want will make all spaces mixed sex. And no one wants that, definitely not women, probably not any decent man.
The only people who do want that are exactly the ones we don’t want in our toilets, prisons, changing rooms, showers, refuges etc. Most decent blokes would die of embarrassment and claw their way out to the door apologising profusely if they found themselves in the ladies loos.
So yes, this is what women and feminists have been getting annoyed about. It’s fascinating that they hate mumsnet so much. Because mumsnet is a place where women talk about woman stuff. Breastfeeding, periods, relationships etc. They HATE that. Literally every thread about domestic violence you get some MRA whining what about the men. They can’t bear to let women have their own space to talk. They are desperate to shut down mumsnet.
Threads which offer up connections between players are mass reported from twitter and specific users reported en masse. Three deletions on the feminist board and they ban you. They want to stop us speaking to each other.
So here we go again. Ed coming to dox us all. I’m so sick of these aggressive, nasty men.
The only people who do want that are exactly the ones we don’t want in our toilets, prisons, changing rooms, showers, refuges etc. Most decent blokes would die of embarrassment and claw their way out to the door apologising profusely if they found themselves in the ladies loos.
So yes, this is what women and feminists have been getting annoyed about. It’s fascinating that they hate mumsnet so much. Because mumsnet is a place where women talk about woman stuff. Breastfeeding, periods, relationships etc. They HATE that. Literally every thread about domestic violence you get some MRA whining what about the men. They can’t bear to let women have their own space to talk. They are desperate to shut down mumsnet.
Threads which offer up connections between players are mass reported from twitter and specific users reported en masse. Three deletions on the feminist board and they ban you. They want to stop us speaking to each other.
So here we go again. Ed coming to dox us all. I’m so sick of these aggressive, nasty men.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2016
This person's behavior is going to earn him a pistio whip to the teeth with all of this posturing .
And Lead Data Scientist is just a title at one organization, he is not a leading data scientist with a voice etc .
What a maroon.
And Lead Data Scientist is just a title at one organization, he is not a leading data scientist with a voice etc .
What a maroon.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2016
lol these nuts are so interchangeable that I didn't even recognize it until I checked back at the first page and saw I had made a post at the start of the thread
I don't know but if you actually visit there you would be confused. It seems a lot more like Portland than you would expect in Virginia.
I don't know but if you actually visit there you would be confused. It seems a lot more like Portland than you would expect in Virginia.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
this thread by "Emily" about 'how to take out the terfs' going around today. in fact, saw the thread on twitter & found this thread here within a minute of each other.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1087785050857504769.html
There’s a playbook for undermining movements that works particularly well when those movements aren’t rooted in reason but in exclusion and mutuality. This playbook works for fascist groups, but also works for reflexive patriotism, hateful religiosity, and other movements.
The important thing to remember is you cannot debate in good faith with someone who will not debate in good faith. You cannot win on those terms.
Any debate is for the benefit of the unaffiliated external observer, so you have to frame the matter in the appropriate context, and that context should be tailored to the virtue centers of the audience. Exclusion and bigotry vs inclusion and civil rights.
Even still, you’re really not in a high-efficiency activity here. You’re far better off doing direct outreach.
Beyond that, there are a number of tools at your disposal. First, you recognize that their sense of identity is unity-focused, so your goal should be to sow distrust among the in-group to factionalize and divide.
Identifying and pressuring existing stress fractures is key. Frame the internal divisions and try to make them appear even larger.
Undermining trust also can take direct forms. I’ll leave it to your imagination here.
Next, remove the pillars of support of the movement. This means engaging with the things they rely on most heavily. This is hard, because this feels like an uphill battle.
If they rely on the media, you find inroads with the media. If they rely on the state, you (carefully and wisely) use the state. Turn their best tools against them. Undermining the trust in their foundations further exacerbates the internal divisions.
Then, shape their message as much ado about nothing. Seal off newcomers joining them because they look like zealots waging a very serious war against an absurd opponent.
While you do this, deny all forms of comfort. Undermine the sense of security in the spaces they feel most comfortable. Again, it’s left to your imagination here.
Each of these things will come with a pushback that will lead to a backlash. Don’t let that surprise you. Predict it and preempt it.
This allows you to start shaping the narrative of your choosing. Do not react. No story about your movement should come as a surprise. Preact. You should always have a response plan.
Finally, leave them in a state of perpetual uncertainty. Make sure they never have any confidence in what you know or what you’re about to do next. Always hold a promise of a bigger backlash against them. This takes time but they’ll learn after a few blows to be more cautious.
If they think you’ve got nothing, always have something. If you have something, make them think you’ve got nothing.
This is precisely the playbook that was implemented after UTR to good success. The effects weren’t immediate but they only took about 7 months to effectively neutralize several key alt right movements and leaders.
TWP was a great example; when The Night of the Wrong Wives went down, there was already a lawsuit, preexisting criminal charges, and extreme internal pressure and divisiveness. Days later, their Discord got published.
What was quite possibly the fastest growing alt right movement after UTR was obliterated. A few people tried to take charge but not seriously. A few spinoff attempts had no success. Several members reached out to me personally saying they quit activism. One came out as trans.
A similar thing is happening to the Proud Boys now. They’re not gone, but NYC indictments hurt them, then the report of the FBI classification and several disfavorable (to them) media stories caused a leadership crisis.
Fascistic movements think that unification around their identity is what makes them strong, but it’s not. It makes them weak.
While cringing a bit by even brining this up, this is precisely how Russia exploited American identitarianism to manipulate our democracy.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1087785050857504769.html
There’s a playbook for undermining movements that works particularly well when those movements aren’t rooted in reason but in exclusion and mutuality. This playbook works for fascist groups, but also works for reflexive patriotism, hateful religiosity, and other movements.
The important thing to remember is you cannot debate in good faith with someone who will not debate in good faith. You cannot win on those terms.
Any debate is for the benefit of the unaffiliated external observer, so you have to frame the matter in the appropriate context, and that context should be tailored to the virtue centers of the audience. Exclusion and bigotry vs inclusion and civil rights.
Even still, you’re really not in a high-efficiency activity here. You’re far better off doing direct outreach.
Beyond that, there are a number of tools at your disposal. First, you recognize that their sense of identity is unity-focused, so your goal should be to sow distrust among the in-group to factionalize and divide.
Identifying and pressuring existing stress fractures is key. Frame the internal divisions and try to make them appear even larger.
Undermining trust also can take direct forms. I’ll leave it to your imagination here.
Next, remove the pillars of support of the movement. This means engaging with the things they rely on most heavily. This is hard, because this feels like an uphill battle.
If they rely on the media, you find inroads with the media. If they rely on the state, you (carefully and wisely) use the state. Turn their best tools against them. Undermining the trust in their foundations further exacerbates the internal divisions.
Then, shape their message as much ado about nothing. Seal off newcomers joining them because they look like zealots waging a very serious war against an absurd opponent.
While you do this, deny all forms of comfort. Undermine the sense of security in the spaces they feel most comfortable. Again, it’s left to your imagination here.
Each of these things will come with a pushback that will lead to a backlash. Don’t let that surprise you. Predict it and preempt it.
This allows you to start shaping the narrative of your choosing. Do not react. No story about your movement should come as a surprise. Preact. You should always have a response plan.
Finally, leave them in a state of perpetual uncertainty. Make sure they never have any confidence in what you know or what you’re about to do next. Always hold a promise of a bigger backlash against them. This takes time but they’ll learn after a few blows to be more cautious.
If they think you’ve got nothing, always have something. If you have something, make them think you’ve got nothing.
This is precisely the playbook that was implemented after UTR to good success. The effects weren’t immediate but they only took about 7 months to effectively neutralize several key alt right movements and leaders.
TWP was a great example; when The Night of the Wrong Wives went down, there was already a lawsuit, preexisting criminal charges, and extreme internal pressure and divisiveness. Days later, their Discord got published.
What was quite possibly the fastest growing alt right movement after UTR was obliterated. A few people tried to take charge but not seriously. A few spinoff attempts had no success. Several members reached out to me personally saying they quit activism. One came out as trans.
A similar thing is happening to the Proud Boys now. They’re not gone, but NYC indictments hurt them, then the report of the FBI classification and several disfavorable (to them) media stories caused a leadership crisis.
Fascistic movements think that unification around their identity is what makes them strong, but it’s not. It makes them weak.
While cringing a bit by even brining this up, this is precisely how Russia exploited American identitarianism to manipulate our democracy.
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
IKR? When I read that all I could think was how awesome it would have been if that guy had replied with the 'Navy SEALs' copypasta instead. But of course, that wouldn't have fit in Twatter. Still, it was a pretty righteous reply.
My first viewing of this particular aspect of the Rat King, and man oh man does this mangina ever ring the Sam Ambreen bell HARD. NAZIS!! WHITE SUPREMISTS!!! NEO-NAZIS!! TERFS!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
Sometimes I think the Internet was a massive mistake. Even from the beginnings once it escaped DARPA and opened up to universities, UseNet groups became infested with sick fucks and political idealogues as early as the late 70s/early 80's. Nowadays it's the same shit, but with full motion video to go along with the text rants.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2018
Someone should tell "her" that the general public doesn't look down upon "TERFs" like they do with neo-nazis. The big advantage that Antifa has is that they can claim that they are fighting an ideology which most people already find distasteful. So it holds real weight when they dox people on the alt-right because it means they will likely face real consequences (losing their job, support from their friends and family, and so on).
But TERFs? The average person hasn't even heard that word before, and if they were told what it means they would at worst think they were misguided. It's like they've forgotten that people outside of their far-left Twitter echo chamber aren't concerned about the same things.
- Joined
- May 12, 2016
We are so deep into social justice that a forum for moms to talk about their husbands and gossip is being compared to secretive fascist movements that plan to engage in actual violence. Edward is utterly detached from reality.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2015
If you have to repeatedly talk about how much of a badass you are, then you're not a badass.
- Joined
- May 24, 2014
i love how this guy posts dozens of tweets detailing how he'll join women's spaces to harm women, in order to show that transwomen deserve access to women's spaces.
troons have got to be the dumbest fucking people ever
troons have got to be the dumbest fucking people ever
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
@GenderCop Don't forget to archive; I'm not sure threadreader does. Better safe than sorry!
http://archive.li/kQ0Ef
Looking through his ranting, he claims that fascists are unified around a single identity, but what does that make him and his tranny movement? He attacks groups based on identity while at the same time identifying with a group that defines itself by their identity as troons. He fits every definition he tries to apply to the "Alt-right."
He's a bloody hypocrite. But that's a badge of honor for him, isn't it?
CIA Nigger
Not a fed, just a random object on the street.
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 15, 2017
Ed doesn't get there's a difference between a dying revival of a failed political ideology that most people either hate or don't care about, and a catch all term for anyone critical of the trans movement.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
What the fuck are they putting in the water?
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
We have though. We have several threads on delusional, violent, misogynistic, mentally-ill men in dresses.
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
Maybe for humanity at large, but not for us. Where would we get our entertainment without Twitter?
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
By going downtown to the bus station and watching the mentally-ill homeless fight each other on who gets to sit by the vending machine next.