That's not what I've been seeing. Since you showed up here, it's been your own words and actions in this thread that have been your worst enemy. All that's been done on this end is reporting and commenting on the things that you've been doing. Your own words are condemning you - your blog, your posts on other forums, everything you've done on this thread, that's all that's being worked from. You're asking us to stop hitting you, but all this time, it's been you punching yourself in your own plaque-ridden grin.
Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend
- Thread starter RequiredName
- Start date
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
You know it's bad when accidentally reading that as "plague-ridden grin" still applies.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
I think they would ignore the typewriters and start arguing about who was the real TJ and who was the smartest and all that until they all died of hunger from forgetting to eat. Or it might turn into the most narcissistic orgy that ever happened.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
TJ 5473: You do not have any proof of being the real &/or original TJ Church, which you can't prove because if you weren't here then I would still be here.
TJ 50624: The only thing I've proved (which I did not even have to attempt to do) was that I'm more intelligent &/or literate than you are. You cannot prove to me anything because it's already been shown that you aren't as smart as me.
TJ 265: I don't have to show anything because you both have already proven that you aren't anywhere as intelligent as I am, & you should both realize that your levels of intelligence will never reach my level &/or IQ.
- Joined
- May 20, 2014
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Anyone want some pizza? I sure as hell won't be eating dinner tonight after picturing that.
Mr. X
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
We'd only get endless variations of the same boasts we've had from the beginning. The difference is that by random chance one of them might seem coherent.
Also I nominate Piñata Head as another nickname for our favorite bovine.
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I want candy, not a shower of cerebrospinal fluid, thanks.
oh god that would be the lube in the orgy why did I think of that
(stop up-voting this post, you're only going to encourage me)
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
From now on, I'm just gonna call him "Dummy".
Mr. X
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
I just realized something important, namely that Joe Cracker is smarter than TJ, and it shows via one simple fact: Joe has stopped posting in his thread while TJ keeps going.
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
That is the single worst use of a semicolon I've ever read.
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2013
Hmmm.... ya might have a small point here, because if we look at the aforementioned formula-
And your statement
You know what? TJ's right- we haven't done too much because-
1a.) TJ has already proven himself to be a terrible writer
1b.) TJ has already proven himself to have no grasp on reality or logic
1c.) TJ has already proven himself to have no actual working knowledge on human sexuality
1d.) TJ has already proven himself to have the argumentative skills of a sixth grader
Therefore, we really haven't 'identified' anything, per se- we've mostly pointed out the elephant in the room.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2014
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2013
but let's not forget we haven't proven anything about TJ
it's all basically true tho
it's all basically true tho
D
DN 420
Guest
kiwifarms.net
remember that one time you wanted this thread deleted
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
good times, man. good times.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2014
remeber that one time this thread was basically dead until TJ brought it to life like Jesus did Lazarus
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2014
Well, let me respond to the latest slew of writing...
1] Mr. X, you have yet to prove or note either inability, & never will in my case, as the problem is not my inability to prove my intelligence or converse like a rational human being. Rather, it is the vast majority of you who possess the inability (or perhaps simply refusal, due to the fact that doing so would hurt-if-not-end your cause) to do so.
2] Fool, I may be the one who needs to prove something, & it may seem to you that I have failed to do so, but that is not the fault of me, but of the people who have failed to comprehend my multiple repeated showings & explanations of proof. Some would respond to that statement by saying the need to prove it still lies with me. However, there would be no need of myself to prove my intelligence to prove said intelligence to any of you if this thread had not begun (as has been noted repeated times in the thread) with people claiming that I was not a person (& therefore certainly not an intelligent person), so the person(s) needing to prove statements is not me, but the posters of the original statements, which (as again has been posted repeatedly) are the only reason I ever came here.
(Also, I am not trying to "put on" any "zinger" or hurt you at all... But the fact you admit it takes you that long to figure out what I am saying proves the issue is with those trying to understand something they never knew to be untrue, not with the person repeatedly stating & proving its truthfulness.)
3] Dravite, what I have said has been the same things over & over. However, that is largely due to 2 basic reasons: Your inability to understand these things, & their continuing to be the truth & never be unproven. You're largely reporting on the things I write, but most of that has consisted of quoting my mistakes in spelling & punctuation, which is then followed by at least one poster claiming it as evidence of my stupidity (or the like). The mistakes have been made, & I would never attempt to claim otherwise. However, as I have sometimes then gone on to return the favor, it can be seen that many of you have made the same/similar mistakes, so using mine to prove idiocy only does the same to yourselves, which is a seemingly-never-ending line, & does not prove any intellectual superiority can be claimed by anyone.
(Also, before anyone says it, I am not claiming that any one of you has claimed intellectual superiority over me, though it has been implied by the quoting & mocking of my mistakes, claim of fluency in multiple languages, etc.)
4] Absinthe, I have already written it in this post, but I shall again if need be: It is not that I am "really bad at proving things". It is either you (as a group/majority, not individually) that has a problem with comprehension, or that you are simply pretending to. (I suspect it may be the latter, as admitting it if you ever became convinced/agreed with me would lead to the ending of this ongoing thread/discussion.)
5] Bucharest, neither of us have proven me to be or have any of those things. Also, there is no "elephant in the room", because elephants are said to never forget, whereas you all make sure you can't be said/thought to have forgotten anything, as you repeatedly claim to be constantly unaware of the facts when they are presented &/or proven.
1] Mr. X, you have yet to prove or note either inability, & never will in my case, as the problem is not my inability to prove my intelligence or converse like a rational human being. Rather, it is the vast majority of you who possess the inability (or perhaps simply refusal, due to the fact that doing so would hurt-if-not-end your cause) to do so.
2] Fool, I may be the one who needs to prove something, & it may seem to you that I have failed to do so, but that is not the fault of me, but of the people who have failed to comprehend my multiple repeated showings & explanations of proof. Some would respond to that statement by saying the need to prove it still lies with me. However, there would be no need of myself to prove my intelligence to prove said intelligence to any of you if this thread had not begun (as has been noted repeated times in the thread) with people claiming that I was not a person (& therefore certainly not an intelligent person), so the person(s) needing to prove statements is not me, but the posters of the original statements, which (as again has been posted repeatedly) are the only reason I ever came here.
(Also, I am not trying to "put on" any "zinger" or hurt you at all... But the fact you admit it takes you that long to figure out what I am saying proves the issue is with those trying to understand something they never knew to be untrue, not with the person repeatedly stating & proving its truthfulness.)
3] Dravite, what I have said has been the same things over & over. However, that is largely due to 2 basic reasons: Your inability to understand these things, & their continuing to be the truth & never be unproven. You're largely reporting on the things I write, but most of that has consisted of quoting my mistakes in spelling & punctuation, which is then followed by at least one poster claiming it as evidence of my stupidity (or the like). The mistakes have been made, & I would never attempt to claim otherwise. However, as I have sometimes then gone on to return the favor, it can be seen that many of you have made the same/similar mistakes, so using mine to prove idiocy only does the same to yourselves, which is a seemingly-never-ending line, & does not prove any intellectual superiority can be claimed by anyone.
(Also, before anyone says it, I am not claiming that any one of you has claimed intellectual superiority over me, though it has been implied by the quoting & mocking of my mistakes, claim of fluency in multiple languages, etc.)
4] Absinthe, I have already written it in this post, but I shall again if need be: It is not that I am "really bad at proving things". It is either you (as a group/majority, not individually) that has a problem with comprehension, or that you are simply pretending to. (I suspect it may be the latter, as admitting it if you ever became convinced/agreed with me would lead to the ending of this ongoing thread/discussion.)
5] Bucharest, neither of us have proven me to be or have any of those things. Also, there is no "elephant in the room", because elephants are said to never forget, whereas you all make sure you can't be said/thought to have forgotten anything, as you repeatedly claim to be constantly unaware of the facts when they are presented &/or proven.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
@Cowlick I'm pretty sure someone with your above average iq would be able to figure out how to tag users in a post
Mr. X
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
So you respond to my statement that you can't interact like a rational human being by failing to interact like a rational human being. You really are a special kind of stupid.