- Joined
- Apr 15, 2014
Is that Russel Greer in that profile pic? Who’s dummy account is that?
(Watching commies and anarchists turn on each other is hilarious)
Jason Unruhe & Maoist Rebel News
- Thread starter Smutley
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
(Watching commies and anarchists turn on each other is hilarious)
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
Almost takes you back to the Spanish Civil War.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2017
This is like in all the far right circles where they purity spiral and accuse each other of not being white enough. But in this case accusing each other of being Imperialists.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
There is absolutely nothing socialist about Iran. It went from an absolute monarchy which crushed communists to a theocratic dictatorship led by a Holocaust denier which also crushes communists. There hasn't been much hope for socialism there since Mossadegh in the 1950s.
Hux
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 10, 2018
TL;DW: a Communist party in California with troon members blew party funds on hookers and said troons hosted orgies after each meeting. Female party members didn't like the idea of fucking a troon, who then predictably got pissed at them and called them terfs, the dumbassery of the party being so great that it ended up disbanding after all the female party members left
If anyone realizes that IdPol is a massive crock of shit, that's a sure fire sign that they're not a complete fucking idiot
But then again this dude is a Maoist at the end of the day, so that just means he still remains a massive fucking idiot
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
At the end of the day he's just another person raised to hate his host nation, and based on his idolization of strong man regimes simply long for a authoritarian rule that he can be a part off
Also holy fucking shit. That whole deal with the California Communist party is too good to be true. See this is what happens when you let fetishists climb to the top of the "progressive stack".
Maybe troons are part of a megacorporate plan to cripple leftism
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
Jim Profit is Jason's Half-Brother and even though he's the only person to get personally banned by Moot he still gets laid more than Jason.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
Jason could've been a NazBol McVeigh
Him with Spencer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7817&v=XFRb8yEo5Bg
At 37 minutes in Jason has thus far crashed and burned hard. Spencer rightfully calls Jason out on how he's only able to debate through rhetoric, which is true. (Jason never uses facts, he thinks he doesn't need to, all he needs to do is back his opponents into a corner; this time it doesn't work, because Dickie - unlike Roo - can actually read and present a decent argument).
When you get at 1:38:00 mark Spencer and Striker are proving they are not only cultured and well-read but eloquent, whereas all Roo can do is parrot the same arguments he's made ad nauseam in his videos. Spencer was even asked about his fiction book preferences; I doubt Roo has read anything on the past five years aside from snippets of articles on Marxist econ.
1:52:00ish, Dick mocks Jason's moralism.
In this "debate", Spencer claims that the Bolshevik Revolution was financed by Wall Street because of the NEP. Than Jason starts talking about the NEP. Than Spencer says that the NEP was unnecessary and the Five year Plans were better and the NEP was just free cash for capital.
Richard Spencer literally out-lefts Jason.
Edit 1/14:
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2014
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
Even the creator has moved on to make a semi-parody of Star Trek.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2018
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
His love of family guy tickles me. It's like if Slavoj Zizek was a devotee of the fonz.
Proposal: if you lose a debate to Richard Spencer or Eric Striker (a pair of fruity mongoloids whose minds are steadily going to the AIDS they've given each other), you shouldn't be legally allowed to argue on the internet for a while after that, just like you shouldn't be allowed to drive a car for a while if you get a DUI.
View attachment 620236
Jason could've been a NazBol McVeigh
Him with Spencer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7817&v=XFRb8yEo5Bg
At 37 minutes in Jason has thus far crashed and burned hard. Spencer rightfully calls Jason out on how he's only able to debate through rhetoric, which is true. (Jason never uses facts, he thinks he doesn't need to, all he needs to do is back his opponents into a corner; this time it doesn't work, because Dickie - unlike Roo - can actually read and present a decent argument).
When you get at 1:38:00 mark Spencer and Striker are proving they are not only cultured and well-read but eloquent, whereas all Roo can do is parrot the same arguments he's made ad nauseam in his videos. Spencer was even asked about his fiction book preferences; I doubt Roo has read anything on the past five years aside from snippets of articles on Marxist econ.
1:52:00ish, Dick mocks Jason's moralism.
In this "debate", Spencer claims that the Bolshevik Revolution was financed by Wall Street because of the NEP. Than Jason starts talking about the NEP. Than Spencer says that the NEP was unnecessary and the Five year Plans were better and the NEP was just free cash for capital.
Richard Spencer literally out-lefts Jason.
Edit 1/14:
Proposal: if you lose a debate to Richard Spencer or Eric Striker (a pair of fruity mongoloids whose minds are steadily going to the AIDS they've given each other), you shouldn't be legally allowed to argue on the internet for a while after that, just like you shouldn't be allowed to drive a car for a while if you get a DUI.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
Just an insight... Maoism isn't even popular in China. He's simply regarded and held up like a God for being the founder of PRC, much like the Founding Fathers of the States. China isn't even communist, their party is communist only in name and for historical reasons. China is a populist dictatorship, also coined as "Chinese style socialism".
I can't understand all these westerners being so into Mao. Do they not know how horrifying it was? One gets executed publicly for simply shattering a plate with Mao's face on it under the rules of "anti-revolution (反革命罪)". Owning and keeping chickens for food is considered capitalist and punishable, let alone the fangled electronics these faggots use to post their utterly moronic shit online.
The stuff written about in Orwell, being citizens selling each others out for the state to gain shekelz and inhabitants living in constant fear of wrongthink is rampant under Mao's rule. One must hide secrets from their family in fear of being outed, because guess what? If you don't out someone for "plotting anti-revolutionary acts", you get the same punishment. The term anti-revolution is looser than the TOS of kikebook and Jewtube. The rulers are able to punish any act under that label. It's not getting banned from a gay social media site, it's getting banned from life.
Hey fatty, you're too fat to be a Maoist revolutionary. Also I censored the Oriental Pearl Radio & TV Tower (Pearl Tower of Shanghai) in the back because he doesn't deserve to have it. The reflectivity of his potato forehead though. Did he polish it?
One extra thing, the Nazis and Communists did have some amazing posters. Something these post-mordernist faggot revolutionary LaRpeRs cannot reproduce because they lack talent and a brain.
I can't understand all these westerners being so into Mao. Do they not know how horrifying it was? One gets executed publicly for simply shattering a plate with Mao's face on it under the rules of "anti-revolution (反革命罪)". Owning and keeping chickens for food is considered capitalist and punishable, let alone the fangled electronics these faggots use to post their utterly moronic shit online.
The stuff written about in Orwell, being citizens selling each others out for the state to gain shekelz and inhabitants living in constant fear of wrongthink is rampant under Mao's rule. One must hide secrets from their family in fear of being outed, because guess what? If you don't out someone for "plotting anti-revolutionary acts", you get the same punishment. The term anti-revolution is looser than the TOS of kikebook and Jewtube. The rulers are able to punish any act under that label. It's not getting banned from a gay social media site, it's getting banned from life.
Hey fatty, you're too fat to be a Maoist revolutionary. Also I censored the Oriental Pearl Radio & TV Tower (Pearl Tower of Shanghai) in the back because he doesn't deserve to have it. The reflectivity of his potato forehead though. Did he polish it?
One extra thing, the Nazis and Communists did have some amazing posters. Something these post-mordernist faggot revolutionary LaRpeRs cannot reproduce because they lack talent and a brain.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2018
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2019
Most of the sparrowfuckers I've seen online consider themselves to be "Marxist-Leninist-Maoists". It's the perfect dialectical synthesis of being an edgy radlib, because you can tack on some extra tenets to a more popular tendency and, as a result, subscribe to an ideology that has literally never been tried (you see the same thing with all the different branches of anarchism).
In this respect, I think they're very similar to Neoreactionaries; they think that it's okay to suppress other people's speech because they think they're loyal revolutionaries who will never end up against the wall. Of course, when you fanatically and uncritically promote an ideology like in Maoist China, people become obsessed with purity, and even the smallest mistakes can get you thrown in the pig-iron furnace...
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
I this sense I really have to give it to the NRx. Being monarchists, their ideology is far less dependent on ideological purity from a practical standpoint, as evidenced by the extensive history of monarchies with relative freedom in contrast with the totalitarian Maoist/Bolshevik ideolocracy.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2018
Troons truly are exceptional, then they wonder why everyone hates them. 
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2018
This is Alternate history Sargon where he wears red shirts instead of black. Got it.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
Maoism third worldism and NRx are pretty similar, history-wise. They were both dead gay ideologies popular exclusively among the spergiest, most mentally-ill corners of the internet, and collapsed around 2010 when the 6 paranoid shutin bloggers/forum trolls who believed in them all had meltdowns and doxxed each other.
Uphold Antianime-Wahlbergist-Macarthurist thought.
Is this ugly maoist duckling finally becoming a beautiful nazbol swan? Come to the dark side jason, we have stewie griffin funko pops.
Last edited: