Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

It's a shame that none of them have said "yes" just to get the creep on the table with the family jewels out in the open for a good hard punch.

It's strange to me that this idiot hasn't considered that maybe he shouldn't be trying to force women to fondle his balls because of what women are traditionally taught to do to an aggressive man's balls.
Spoken like a man. Perhaps it's because women don't typically punch men or grind their jewels. Imagine the lawsuits. Men would be killing even more women for shit like this. Women get killed for much less.

Edit: deleted redundancy.
Also how is any of this autistic, Stock? Or is that your stock response for anything you can't understand?
 
Last edited:
It's a shame that none of them have said "yes" just to get the creep on the table with the family jewels out in the open for a good hard punch.

It's strange to me that this idiot hasn't considered that maybe he shouldn't be trying to force women to fondle his balls because of what women are traditionally taught to do to an aggressive man's balls.
Strange you haven’t considered that they’re getting exactly what lots of women get...revenge-punished for telling a man “no.”
 
It's a shame that none of them have said "yes" just to get the creep on the table with the family jewels out in the open for a good hard punch.

It's strange to me that this idiot hasn't considered that maybe he shouldn't be trying to force women to fondle his balls because of what women are traditionally taught to do to an aggressive man's balls.

It doesn't even take a punch. Just give him what he's asking for. The thing about malpractice lawsuits is that you need to have reasonably deep pockets for the injured party to get a payout.

I'd sure like to see evidence of all the terribly transphobic things that Canadian (or generally western) trannies are experiencing. (Insanely SJW Canada is one of the most trans friendly countries in the world and trannies from all over flock there thinking they'll get less hassle.) There's little evidence of the vast number of murders they claim, certainly not by anyone who understands biology anyhow.

There's almost no evidence of suicide; the majority of the studies on it have been debunked. As for street and other public harassment, a lot of trans say they enjoy being catcalled and find it arousing. IF these terrible things were really happening, there'd be a massive outcry.

Why do the legals who hear/defend cases like this not do any actual research into the background of transcult and realise what a pack of lies and depravity it really is? Why are they so sure that all these transtropes are based on real events? Who are the bagmen bringing cash for legals, charities, gov agencies and the like? Without a steady flow of $$$, what is the purpose of bowing down to the transbible? Surely there's better ways for officials to look cool though why they'd need to is baffling.

Edit: formatting

Going by how people react to obvious troons in public, I'd guess that the vast majority ignore them. Most people who have a problem with troons for one reason or another are still, on some level, afraid of them (either because of the crazy, murderous tranny stereotype or because of the crazy, socially vindictive tranny reality) and so leave them be. You have to have little to lose to go after them hard in public, which also explains why some of the few credible instances of harassment of troons were perpetrated by mentally ill homeless men or general low-lifes who probably already have a rap sheet a mile long. And I'm talking about the U.S. here; I can imagine Canadians being even more disinterested in harassing anyone.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Spoken like a man. Perhaps it's because women don't typically punch men or grind their jewels. Imagine the lawsuits. Men would be killing even more women for shit like this. Women get killed for much less.

Edit: deleted redundancy.
Also how is any of this autistic, Stock? Or is that your stock response for anything you can't understand?
It's autistic because you're bringing the exact same rhetoric, wording and all, straight from r/GC to here. Whenever a thread gets infested by people who didn't originally come to this site to laugh at lolcows, that thread turns into an autistic mess. I saw it in the Dylan Hafertepen thread, I saw it in the zoosadist threads, and I have a suspicion it's going to happen to this thread too. Sometimes it's good to be reminded of how your wording looks from an outsider's perspective, because as it stands your original post reads like an excerpt from the people we catalogue in the TERF thread. Next time someone gives you a rating that offends you, don't edit your post afterwards to snark at them, woman up and @ them.
 
Spoken like a man. Perhaps it's because women don't typically punch men or grind their jewels. Imagine the lawsuits. Men would be killing even more women for shit like this. Women get killed for much less.

Edit: deleted redundancy.
Also how is any of this autistic, Stock? Or is that your stock response for anything you can't understand?

Oof, a lot to unpack here.

Okay, first of all your post is autistic because anyone who isn't autistic can immediately see that @moocow wasn't seriously suggesting a reasonable course of action for the stylists involved. It is not reasonable to respond to a transgender woman's request that you wax his scrotum in your salon by pretending that you're willing to do it to get him naked and spreadeagled on your waxing table before randomly and violently assaulting his testicles unprovoked. That's insane and only a completely autistic person would take that literally instead of immediately seeing that moocow is simply expressing the very relatable desire that Yaniv was in pain because he's a piece of shit who deserves to be in pain.

Your post is autistic because after taking something overly literally, you then go into bitter ruminations on how women would be murdered and sued for luring somebody into a position of defenselessness and then punching them in the balls without provocation. Men as a class oppress women as a class in hundreds of different ways, but not being permitted to randomly assault men in the genitals without fear of consequences is not a patriarchal system of oppression. As far as I know there's no societal epidemic of women being deadass strangled to death in public businessfronts for luring men onto waxing tables and then surprise-attacking them in the balls. That's retarded. If anybody did that then they're an insane person who deserves to get the absolute shit kicked out of them. If you're forced into a physical struggle with a man larger and stronger than you, then you should absolutely go for his eyes, throat and testicles. You should fight and scream and bite and claw and gouge and use literally any advantage and exploit any weakness you can find. But having sour grapes that you can't just randomly do that unprovoked to men who annoy you because you're afraid of getting murdered for it is an insane autistic mindset.

Your post is autistic because you accuse moocow of 'speaking like a man' when their sex isn't listed and everything about their profile suggests to me that it's a female poster. I could be wrong on this but regardless, it is incredibly poor form here to dismiss people out of hand based on their identity, and doubly so when it's just things you assume about their identity. We are a diverse and accepting forum for all kinds of people, and if you have to fall back on telling people they're wrong because they're male, female, white, black, communist, nazi, racist or libcuck, especially when you don't know for sure, you look like an autist who can't interact with people because you just crawled out of an insulated safe space where the only excuse for discourse is people mindlessly head-bobbing along in agreement with each other as they figuratively slide their throats up and down on each other's cocks. That kind of shit might fly in /r/gendercritical where it's a female radical feminist space and all the males are happy to let you treat them like unwanted subhumans because they know they're intruding somewhere they're not entirely welcome, it might fly in r9k where women are definitively not welcome and not wanted greeted with screeching choruses of 'gtfo roastie' and put up with it because they know they'll still be bombarded with uncontested male orbiting, it might fly in /pol/ and Something Awful where certain opinions are orthodox and other opinions are heresy, but everyone is welcome here. You don't win any points with us relying on that tired identitarian shit.

And finally your post is autistic because you did possibly the most cancerous thing possible and edited it to ask why you're getting downvoted. This is not reddit. Downvotes won't collapse your post or drop you to the bottom of the page. Downvotes don't matter here. Opinions and groupthink are not enforced by staff or by the dictate of the mob. No matter what you think, no matter who you are, some people here will agree with you and some people will disagree with you. You don't have to defend your viewpoints to them, nor do you have to hide them from us if you realise they're unpopular. Unpopular opinions are what make Kiwi Farms so beautiful and unique, and we love and cherish the unpopular opinions of all our little children, including yours. But if you're going to bring that reddit shit here and get all fussed about downvotes, people are going to let you know that you no longer have to live your life as a slave to the system, yearning for the pozload, cowering from the negrate. At the time of posting this I have well over seven thousand negrates. It doesn't matter a bit. This is not reddit and there are plenty of cautionary examples of what happens to people who take their upboats too seriously here. Welcome to Kiwi Farms.
 
That’s the one.

And yes, absolutely- it’s the same all the way down. Whether it’s in a relationship or using the court system. It’s very interesting to look at TRA behaviour through this lens. I can’t remember where I saw it but I did see one bit of work looking at the overlap between personality disorders and transgender presentation. They made quite a clear distinction between classic gender dysphoria (generally not displaying these patterns) and the rest of the stonewall umbrella (mad as a box of frogs.)

You see the same thought patterns as cluster B disorders; all or nothing thinking plus a fragile sense of self, for example. I think that’s where the ‘you're Literally murdering me with your words wahhhhh’ stuff comes from. Then add in the suicide threats - again a classic control method (if you leave me, I’ll kill myself.)

It’s worth saying that one reason (among many) that women are alarmed at TRA behaviours is that a lot of women have seen these exact patterns before, in violent or abusive relationships. Coercive control, preventing women from having any private space, manipulation of words, gaslighting, etc. Once you’ve seen it, it stands out like a beacon.

People with gender dysphoria aside, a large proportion of men with AGP are screaming examples of cluster B/abusive pattern behaviour.
 
That’s the one.

And yes, absolutely- it’s the same all the way down. Whether it’s in a relationship or using the court system. It’s very interesting to look at TRA behaviour through this lens. I can’t remember where I saw it but I did see one bit of work looking at the overlap between personality disorders and transgender presentation. They made quite a clear distinction between classic gender dysphoria (generally not displaying these patterns) and the rest of the stonewall umbrella (mad as a box of frogs.)

You see the same thought patterns as cluster B disorders; all or nothing thinking plus a fragile sense of self, for example. I think that’s where the ‘you're Literally murdering me with your words wahhhhh’ stuff comes from. Then add in the suicide threats - again a classic control method (if you leave me, I’ll kill myself.)

It’s worth saying that one reason (among many) that women are alarmed at TRA behaviours is that a lot of women have seen these exact patterns before, in violent or abusive relationships. Coercive control, preventing women from having any private space, manipulation of words, gaslighting, etc. Once you’ve seen it, it stands out like a beacon.

People with gender dysphoria aside, a large proportion of men with AGP are screaming examples of cluster B/abusive pattern behaviour.

They've found links between transgenders and autism (this is likely disproportionately AGP transtrender types), and I wouldn't be surprised if they link it to said cluster B disorders. The similarities are stunning.
 
It doesn't even take a punch. Just give him what he's asking for. The thing about malpractice lawsuits is that you need to have reasonably deep pockets for the injured party to get a payout.



Going by how people react to obvious troons in public, I'd guess that the vast majority ignore them. Most people who have a problem with troons for one reason or another are still, on some level, afraid of them (either because of the crazy, murderous tranny stereotype or because of the crazy, socially vindictive tranny reality) and so leave them be. You have to have little to lose to go after them hard in public, which also explains why some of the few credible instances of harassment of troons were perpetrated by mentally ill homeless men or general low-lifes who probably already have a rap sheet a mile long. And I'm talking about the U.S. here; I can imagine Canadians being even more disinterested in harassing anyone.


People aren't afraid of trannies, they're disgusted by them.
 
People aren't afraid of trannies, they're disgusted by them.

There's that too, but even when the feeling is more disgust than fear, I think most people still would rather avoid the person who disgusts them than tangle with them.

It's like, when I see a homeless guy who's obviously shit his pants (and I have seen this a few times), I'm disgusted by that, but I'm also giving him a wide berth, avoiding eye contact, and doing whatever else is necessary not to draw his attention to me.
 
They've found links between transgenders and autism (this is likely disproportionately AGP transtrender types), and I wouldn't be surprised if they link it to said cluster B disorders. The similarities are stunning.
Autistic kids are statistically more likely to be abused and BPD is a response to abuse.
It's also known that people who have autism are highly likely to have people in their family with schizophrenia and OCD.
 
Yaniv is using a lawyer to send cease and desist threats to service providers around my company, but not directly to it. I'll say more when I know more.

Because he knows you'll tell him to see you in a real court, which he's too much a coward to enter and he's too cheap to pay for, so he's hoping to put secondary pressure on people who provide service for you to force you to back down.

This jackass is taking notes from Vordrak, only it's even more pathetic coming from some sick fuck obsessed with tampons and creeping on women in the ladies room.
 
Because he knows you'll tell him to see you in a real court, which he's too much a coward to enter and he's too cheap to pay for, so he's hoping to put secondary pressure on people who provide service for you to force you to back down.

Exactly. His strategy relies on targets of his blackmail feeling too socially pressured to stand up to him, state publically what he's doing, and weather the heat. Yaniv is doing this by trooning out and making anyone who says "no" into a horrible transphobe. David D'Amato did this by hiring straight men from poor, conservative areas to film gay porn and then threaten to tell their families when they wouldn't do what he wanted. It's a transparent strategy if you know it's coming- a PR release saying "hey, this looney toon is going to talk crazy shit" gets ahead of it completely- which is why he's not going for Null directly.
 
The Kiwi Farms' Museum of Yaniv Pedo Prattling is an existential threat for Jonathan.

For years, he's played an exhibitionist's game of forcing his fetishes on people, like on Facebook, and then hiding the evidence by taking down his own dirt and forcing sites to take down people's reactions to it, freeing him to repeat the cycle.

If he can't force takedowns here, he can't manipulate reality by hiding his perversions while still practicing them - and there's nothing whatsoever to Jonathan other than his perversions.
 
Back