Furry Fandom and Drama General

These are furries. Some of them are the reason why the 6-2-1 rule even exists, not that it matters.

There's a reason furcons have AIDS screening available now.

Maybe if furries weren't a bunch of disgusting, unhygienic, bug-spreading degenerates this wouldn't happen.

Should round them all up, tag them, and give them their shots.
 
There's a reason furcons have AIDS screening available now.

Maybe if furries weren't a bunch of disgusting, unhygienic, bug-spreading degenerates this wouldn't happen.

Should round them all up, tag them, and give them their shots.

theres no shot for aids, but "donald trump" is apparently working on a cure.

the only problem is that once aids infects a cell, it basically kills and convert it, thats why its deadly because it acts like cancer but a virus.

i sware the more I read about AIDS it looks lab manufacturered, there is no fucking way that it occurred naturally.

pozzers and bug chasers are notorious for knowing how to make the aids virus more contractable and more deadly as thats there entire culture is infecting people, maybe the fed goverment should talk to those people since they seem to be bioterroist extraordinaires.
 
The way laws are so fucked up in the UK I reckon Corey needs a carry permit for a butter knife. :lol:

heres a nice hint, there probably real because hes a pedophile dog fucker and needs to "defend his rights"
 
Discord has banned cub porn following the media attention regarding their previous stance on it.
http://archive.li/WIjge http://archive.fo/ogIqf

Changing policy on cub porn

Over the past couple of weeks, posts have appeared inquiring about Discord’s stance on a niche area of NSFW policy, which is cub porn. A screenshot of an email we sent about a year ago in February 2018 has garnered significant commentary and criticism about our policy.

As our Community Guidelines state, the following immediately results in account deletion:

Sharing content related to minors that is sexually suggestive or violent. Do not share or post links to images that depict minors or underage individuals engaged in violent, sexually suggestive, pornographic, shameful, or otherwise inappropriate situations.
Furthermore, the following will lead to content removal and a warning (or ban depending on the severity):

Sharing illustrated or digitally altered pornography which depicts minors (such as lolicon or shotacon).
One major reason this policy is in place on Discord is because there is a federal law in the United States against the sexualized images of minors, which includes cartoons and drawings. You can see this distinction in action on Google Images which does not show results for lolicon but does show results for cub porn.

Discord’s current policy is that anything human or humanoid is forbidden (including anthropomorphized characters). This includes most cub pornography.

While this is already more restrictive than what the law requires, we’ve received feedback that we’re not comprehensive enough here. As of today, we’re changing our policy to ban all cub porn. This means the sexualization of minor ban now extends to non-humanoid animals and mythological creatures as long as they appear to be underage. We’re adding “cub” to the list of categories, after lolicon and shotacon, to our Community Guidelines to clarify that this content is not allowed on Discord.
 
there is a federal law in the United States against the sexualized images of minors, which includes cartoons and drawings
I have heard this before but never seen anyone actually show laws against drawings/cartoons of child porn and I have never heard of a US conviction for it. Can anyone give source for this?

I know there was a supreme court case related to this kind of issue (had to google to remember the name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition) where if I am understanding right, it was found that congress couldn't make the drawings illegal... but I am no expert in this area.

basically I've heard both sides claiming different things on the legality
 
I have heard this before but never seen anyone actually show laws against drawings/cartoons of child porn and I have never heard of a US conviction for it. Can anyone give source for this?

I know there was a supreme court case related to this kind of issue (had to google to remember the name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition) where if I am understanding right, it was found that congress couldn't make the drawings illegal... but I am no expert in this area.

basically I've heard both sides claiming different things on the legality

free speech does not apply when your intentionally drawing children or child like depictions, or if it falls under obscenity laws.
 
The first amendment does not protect "obscene" speech. The jury has to find it 'obscene' in order to find you guilty, but many states have laws regarding drawn porn of children. It only has to be found obscene. Which any juror would say child porn is. I suspect the only way you're going to be charged with this is if you're already suspected of being a potential/future threat towards children, whether it be furry cub or human child porn. I see it as something to add on to charges so that you serve a longer sentence.
"After grappling with the obscenity problem in many cases during the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Supreme Court laid out “basic guidelines” for jurors in obscenity cases in its 1973 decision Miller v. California. These include:

  • Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
  • Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law.
  • Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value."
The federal PROTECT Act basically covers this if state laws don't. Was upheld in U.S. v. Schales, 546 F.3d 965 - 2008. You won't be charged with child porn but you'll still be imprisoned for violating this Act. It's basically a "I know it when I see it" thing... You have that niggling feeling when something is drawn with the intention of sparking arousal versus content that is trying to paint a statement... Bobby, that image of a crying cub being raped by a giant human isn't making a statement; it's fodder for you to jerk off to. Inkbunny members really tried to debate with me saying that their stash of cub porn wouldn't be seen as obscene lmfao. Let me catch my son with loli/shota/cub on their computer. Ain't no son of mine. Also inb4 Guest cub defenders swarm ("wE'Re nOT pEdoPHiLeS!!!!").
 
Last edited:
d354f814bfcc9412ffdedea1bfdc2a8d.png

implying Japanese people won't think you're a weirdo as well
 
Back