I got rabies
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2018
Lots of text and sperging I guess.
Tl;dr instead of trying to pick a side I'm just gonna eat popcorn watching all this until something make actual sense because both sides seems r.etarded rn
I don't fucking know anymore. Back in January I thought it was hard to believe that Vic was a bad guy but then I read for hours about stuff he would have done. He seems like a huge diva and a cunt to con staff, that much seems true and believable when I read what people are saying. Con staff have nothing to gain from lying. To be fair, a couple of cons have shit planning, so who knows? Risembool Rangers (his fanclub) sounds shady too but there's not enough details on it and stories could be fake. Neil Kaplan saying getting Vic climbing on his shoulders for fun was rude and he didn't ask before seems legit too, although Neil should just have said he wasn't ready or comfortable for the idea back when it happened.
Then there's all the sexual allegations. This thing has been going on since the early 2000s with over a hundred stories about him being handsy. Surely some of them are real, right? Makes the whole thing believable. But unlike the stories about him being a cunt and a diva, the stories about sexual harassment mostly sound fishy, they're all similar. It's as if there was a tutorial out there on how to fabricate a story. That or they're all looking at the previously submitted stories and try to copy the homework but change it a little so nobody notices.
It irks me because yeah I wanna believe survivors and see justice delivered but how the fuck do I believe something that's fake? If Vic is truly guilty, making up fake stories is not helping at all. It would make the real stories less believable. Also I get that rape victims are silent because they feel completely destroyed, ashamed, scared, wary and get shitty self-esteem and lose confidence in themselves, but if you got kissed on the cheek and you feel uncomfortable, you only feel uncomfortable. You're not assaulted and penetrated, you don't need courage to say "umm you're getting too personal I'm not comfortable with kisses on my cheek or a hand around my waist".
It is entirely possible he could abuse his status and fame to put his hand under a skirt or grope a boob when no one's looking or when he is alone. Who is going to believe the victim? That's the kind of scenario that makes me think he could be guilty. But then nope, lots of fishy homework-copies of the same stories, and oh, let's drop this "only 6% of rape accusations are fake, I stand with the victims!" Since when do we believe those random statistics online? Also 6% doesn't mean that 6% of the allegations against him are fake, it means that 6% of every allegations against anyone are fake. Half of his allegations could be fake and be part of that 6%. All of it could be part of the 6%.
Then comes Monica and I don't believe her for a second. She does not come out to tell her story like a victim. She drops it like an argument against someone on twitter. "O-oh you don't believe the allegations against him?! W-well I'm one of his victims! Haha what do you have to say against that?!" It totally sounds like this to me. Don't even need to talk about her childish twitter crusade with homeland security, calling her lawyers or how she seemed to be pretty friendly with Vic back in December. She thinks she's a hero but she's playing martyr to get attention and she's undermining any actual victim out there.
Then there's all the sexual allegations. This thing has been going on since the early 2000s with over a hundred stories about him being handsy. Surely some of them are real, right? Makes the whole thing believable. But unlike the stories about him being a cunt and a diva, the stories about sexual harassment mostly sound fishy, they're all similar. It's as if there was a tutorial out there on how to fabricate a story. That or they're all looking at the previously submitted stories and try to copy the homework but change it a little so nobody notices.
It irks me because yeah I wanna believe survivors and see justice delivered but how the fuck do I believe something that's fake? If Vic is truly guilty, making up fake stories is not helping at all. It would make the real stories less believable. Also I get that rape victims are silent because they feel completely destroyed, ashamed, scared, wary and get shitty self-esteem and lose confidence in themselves, but if you got kissed on the cheek and you feel uncomfortable, you only feel uncomfortable. You're not assaulted and penetrated, you don't need courage to say "umm you're getting too personal I'm not comfortable with kisses on my cheek or a hand around my waist".
It is entirely possible he could abuse his status and fame to put his hand under a skirt or grope a boob when no one's looking or when he is alone. Who is going to believe the victim? That's the kind of scenario that makes me think he could be guilty. But then nope, lots of fishy homework-copies of the same stories, and oh, let's drop this "only 6% of rape accusations are fake, I stand with the victims!" Since when do we believe those random statistics online? Also 6% doesn't mean that 6% of the allegations against him are fake, it means that 6% of every allegations against anyone are fake. Half of his allegations could be fake and be part of that 6%. All of it could be part of the 6%.
Then comes Monica and I don't believe her for a second. She does not come out to tell her story like a victim. She drops it like an argument against someone on twitter. "O-oh you don't believe the allegations against him?! W-well I'm one of his victims! Haha what do you have to say against that?!" It totally sounds like this to me. Don't even need to talk about her childish twitter crusade with homeland security, calling her lawyers or how she seemed to be pretty friendly with Vic back in December. She thinks she's a hero but she's playing martyr to get attention and she's undermining any actual victim out there.
Tl;dr instead of trying to pick a side I'm just gonna eat popcorn watching all this until something make actual sense because both sides seems r.etarded rn
![:\](/styles/custom/emotes/svg/chris-confused.svg "Confused :\")
