Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
A humble maxim for anyone who wishes to use their art as a vehicle for social politics: Before something can be brilliant, it must first be competent.*

*Courtesy of Glen Berger, co-writer of Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark
 
This really is fascinating to me because Brianna is so obsessed with her social media presence, with being seen the victim AND the victor, that she -
  1. won't verify anything that is sent to her if it paints her in any kind of flattering light
  2. won't listen to anyone who tries to tell her something might be false
  3. won't remove anything even if it was proven false (this tweet is still up as of this writing)

Reddit said it best, I think:
View attachment 10706


I tend to believe people who send me emails, because (a.) who would send unsolicited lies as emails? kind of sad and (b.) who really cares? I'm not basing a career off of it.

Wu posted a tweet. Boy I bet she feels totally ridiculous at this epic ruse.

What's next? Do they call her up and shout :julay:
 
That's great, because I am a prince in my home country of Niger and I need your help!

Brianna did nothing more than post a tweet. This whole incident took about 5 seconds out of her life, while the writing involved epic troll probably took much more time than that.

If you want a valid metaphor: weens wrote her a fake Nigerian 419 letter, Brianna posted it on twitter and weens cried out that they are still the masters of the ebbic trollin'. Brilliant.
 
I tend to believe people who send me emails, because (a.) who would send unsolicited lies as emails? kind of sad and (b.) who really cares? I'm not basing a career off of it.

Wu posted a tweet. Boy I bet she feels totally ridiculous at this epic ruse.

What's next? Do they call her up and shout :julay:

a) most of the people who troll lolcows successfully and unsuccessfully
b) her entire career is based on the marketing of the product known as Brianna Wu, who is also self-described as the prominent figure in Feminism, Truth, and Vidya Games. Her job is to post hundreds of tweets every day and write missives on tumblr. It is incredibly difficult to market yourself to any company when you are proven repeatedly to be an unstable liar who will say anything ridiculous as long as it brings attention, even if it isn't real.

And I think they call up and yell "CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASH!"
 
Brianna did nothing more than post a tweet. This whole incident took about 5 seconds out of her life, while the writing involved epic troll probably took much more time than that.

If you want a valid metaphor: weens wrote her a fake Nigerian 419 letter, Brianna posted it on twitter and weens cried out that they are still the masters of the ebbic trollin'. Brilliant.

It also damaged her credibility (something that she doesn't have much of at this point) and called into question the validity of the emails she had published. Since her life revolves around twitter and social media, this is actually a big deal, since it further exposes what a shady and untrustworthy person she is.

I don't think its any 'lol so epic troll', I just think it is simply another blunder in a list that stretches on and on at this point.
 
http://spacekatgal.tumblr.com/post/104932045643/why-revolution-60s-body-proportions-are-changing
So apparently her game is coming to the PC, and the body proportions of the characters in the game may change
Cxeyb4z.png
On closer inspection, I see Christopher Hart books. Surely explains a lot.
 
Part 2, because there's more.

https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/544009477679493120
WATCH OUT FOR THESE SLANDEROUS MOCKERIES
TJ3Xa1E.png
https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/544011103660171264
srs bsns
8BOBQqm.png
https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/544012844975792128
Gaming journalism
bnGKJYw.png
https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/544014872401682432
Brianna Wu: Victim of TERRORISM GamerGate being oppressed due to being a software engineer and using money from her family
8d3FVJj.png
I also forgot to mention that she also has a Reddit account (http://www.reddit.com/user/spacekatgal). Here's my favorite post from her for now, USI in action:
http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2jylzd/re_twitter_and_false_accounts/cljgr6l

IKUJyrX.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Smutley

The point of academic writing is to "fend off critique from other academics"? Why do you think they would have critiques? Is it maybe because there's something to critique, and the "other academics" are the experts in that field who are precisely the people who should be giving you critiques?

This is why she dropped out of college to become an e-feminist. She doesn't have to think out her arguments, she can just say whatever she wants and if there's a flaw in her logic, then too bad, it's feminism so my arguments are sacred. It's like Anita Sarkeesian saying that weak female characters are "damsels in distress" and strong ones are "trying too hard", etc. It's a flow chart where there's no exit other than "totally sexist", and they don't understand that this makes their argument meaningless.

Also, feminism in games: LEONNNNN
 
Wonder what the second to last tweet was about... probably herself because ego but it'd be hilarious if she meant Anita "I'm not a gamer" Sarkeesian or Zoe "Code theif" Quinn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: José Mourinho
Academia must really be in a bad shape, if Anita Sarkeesian represents it. Even if you block out all the bullshit she tries to sell. Just take a look at her "master thesis". If she represents academia, handsome fellows like this represent medical science:

SnakeOil.jpg


Also:

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back