Angry Joe / Joe Vargas / Jose Antonio Vargas / AngryJoeShow - Streamer, formerly made ANGRY REVIEWS, hates his fans


Joe's salty and whining that people are attacking him over an opinion.. What a fuckin' pussy.

Also, no Joe, you really aren't a reviewer. You are a clown infront of a camera who gets paid to act like a fuckin dumbass

Why hasn't anyone made a vid on this, yet - is my real question. I don't want to see Joe whine about BS; I want to, if I'm in the mood (of course) see someone else making fun of him for being a whiny shit. That actually makes it would-be bearable, honestly. I just hope the comments are from people as annoyed as I am here at how much of a nobody / has-been that he clearly is.
 

Joe's salty and whining that people are attacking him over an opinion.. What a fuckin' pussy.

Also, no Joe, you really aren't a reviewer. You are a clown infront of a camera who gets paid to act like a fuckin dumbass

Good reviewers don't sperg out on their fans if they don't agree with them.
It's totally fine if he didn't like the movie, but learn to take criticism for your views!
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LC0Ij1dUwI

Oh hey, he put a list ranking the worst to the best of the DCEU films.
Not even a minute and he's already basically saying "I'm right, you're wrong, deal with it!"
Some people will say he's joking, but for those that have watched him long enough know that he's mostly serious.
He also thinks he's a legit movie critic. How cute.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LC0Ij1dUwI

Oh hey, he put a list ranking the worst to the best of the DCEU films.
Not even a minute and he's already basically saying "I'm right, you're wrong, deal with it!"
Some people will say he's joking, but for those that have watched him long enough know that he's mostly serious.
He also thinks he's a legit movie critic. How cute.
Boy he is still sucking Suicide Squad's cock with passion and shitting on the people that didn't like it (also called moviegoers with actual taste). That's just embarrassing.
 
Not even a minute and he's already basically saying "I'm right, you're wrong, deal with it!"
Some people will say he's joking, but for those that have watched him long enough know that he's mostly serious.
He also thinks he's a legit movie critic. How cute.
That's the problem with anyone that portrays themselves as some character it seems, they never seem to realize that they're viewed mostly as entertainment. They act as themselves thinking that despite the fact they label themselves as a character that their audience's there primarily for informative content, with the character there just to present it. When of course what's actually happening is that a lot of their misinformation and stupid quirks are assumed to be a part of their character. The audience then assumes that it's a intentional part of their character, and it adds to what the audience perceives to be satire.

The Angry Reviews aren't bad for what they are, entertaining, as well as informative reviews to take the piss out of games. But from what I remember none of his takes were particularly unique, you could probably find genuine reviews that cover what he does in a quarter of the time, and then some. It's the comedy that you come for, but of course that's the element that actually takes effort, so when the laziest Pablo in all of Mexico needs to cut something, it just has to be the only reason you go to his channel. But of course he doesn't see his videos as just something funny, he sees it as this hyper informative review show where the people come to hear these great hot takes, thus he thinks that his opinion can stand on his own without the comedy.
 
I'm still surprised that Complaining Carmelo (or Madman Marco, Hothead Hernándo... whatever you wanna call him) is still around... but then again, I'm still not surprised either way.
 
Also, no Joe, you really aren't a reviewer. You are a clown infront of a camera who gets paid to act like a fuckin dumbass

Well... that really is 90% of "reviewers" on YouTube. So I think the real question to ask is, what specifications do you need to be a real reviewer? Is it just giving an opinion? Or only informed opinion? What makes one informed? And most importantly how does Joe NOT meet these specifications?
 
A few years ago, I used to enjoy his reviews as it was way harder to find reviews that weren't obvious paid shills like IGN. There was even a controversy were several YouTubers were caught using a certain tag to let the developers,and microsoft know they were shilling Forza 5 for money. Though I don't doubt there were others, his reviews were a breath of fresh air.

Nowadays, however, it's hard to find reviewers that don't shit on games, so without the comedy, there isn't much going in Joe's favor. Getting angry at his fans for wanting the content they liked in the first place was a really bad idea. Sad to see how his ego really went to his head.
 
Last edited:
A few years, I used to enjoy his reviews as it was way harder to find reviews that weren't obviously paid shills like IGN. There was even a controversy were several YouTubers were caught using a certain tag to let the developers microsoft know they were shilling Forza 5 for money. Though I don't doubt there were others, his reviews were a breath of fresh air.

Nowadays, however, it's hard to find reviewers that don't shit on games, so without the comedy, there isn't much going in Joe's favor. Getting angry to his fans for wanting the content they liked in the first place was a really bad idea. Sad to see how his ego really went to his head.
I used to like him, but I don’t take too many Youtube reviewers seriously anymore period. In addition to the paid shilling, a lot of them will say they like a game just purely because it’s faddish at the time. About a year ago it seemed like every retro style indie game was getting great reviews, even if they sucked.
 
I'm amazed that anyone watches his movie shit for anything but ironic reasons but I'm also amazed when people pre-order titles like "Fallout 76" or "Anthem." I guess the answer is a quote from H.L. Mencken (shortened): "“No one... has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses..."

Edit to avoid double post: it's also pathetic to me how he dresses all his little minions up in the ridiculous 'angry army' gear
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: TVB
I can't stand to look at the guy with his rolls of fat around his chin and his bearded attempt to cover it up. One thing that has become clear about most of the TGWTG crowd is that what was an act/character when they started... Is no longer an act. He really is as spergy and believes he is better than those that disagree with him as he "pretends" to be.

I will always compare them to the OG reviewer Rolfe. That avgn character, a complete act. Might still be a nerd/passionate about films, but it's all an act. Joe, Doug, Spoony, Linkara... Doesn't seem like an act, you get the sense that what you see as traits are the person themselves.
 
I saw Angry Joe and Geoff Keighley.

Time and time again Joe said he was trying to be "Diplomatic" but that wasn't what he needed to do. He needed to be and approach this "Professionally"
 
  • Like
Reactions: millais and TVB
I'm not as caught up to the Irritable Ignacio lore as others here but what was the deal with that blonde vaguely European girl that was in Joe's videos a couple years ago? I stopped watching Resentful Ramon around then and I never really understood what her deal was.
 
Am I insane to think his voice has become much more nasal and whiny

I'm still amazed that he's been doing this for years and years and still can't figure out not to yell into the mic and fuck up all the levels (you can still yell, you just lean back like an actual voice professional). But I guess that's what brings in the 'angry' views?
 
Back