Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

What is the fourth person doing? Beating their chest like a gorilla?
680941
 

"...Aren't allowed to transition," says what appears to be a 10-year-old Xirl of Color.

Why is it so hard for LaBelle to understand that yes, prepubescent children should not be allowed to make drastic life-altering decisions, and in fact, prepubescent children don't have the sexuality or the awareness to WANT a transitioning?
 

Okay, I am ignoramus here. But to my cis-addled shitlord knowledge having a hysterectomy as a trans man is the point of the transition, as the uterus and the menstruation is a source of gender dysphoria. There was several years ago a pregnant transman. Pregnancy was more out of necessity, and he described it as the darkest time of his life.

Source, I want a source for this, and it should be a law that is still in action and not some shit that isn't even active anymore.

Just go on the toilet, don't make a fuzz. Don't take selfies for instagram, don't creep on people and mind your own business. I am pretty certain most people don't mind, or if you are halfway passing won't even take a second look. And in Canada I am fairly certain they wouldn't even mind if the lady in question has a beard and rocks some amazing chest hair and a full baritone.

I am sure that there ARE laws against this sort of discrimination at work. And businesses would go through media hell and back if they pull this stunt.

How are there laws that exist for a century against transgender, if transgender is recognised hardly for eighty years or so? Before that everything was under the umbrella term transvestite. No matter if you were basically a drag queen, wore the clothes of the opposite gender as a kink or you were genuinely transgender. In Great Britain it was part of the anti homosexual law that was in action up until I think 1965.
 
How are there laws that exist for a century against transgender, if transgender is recognised hardly for eighty years or so? Before that everything was under the umbrella term transvestite. No matter if you were basically a drag queen, wore the clothes of the opposite gender as a kink or you were genuinely transgender. In Great Britain it was part of the anti homosexual law that was in action up until I think 1965.
I remember some French trans activists who explained that transgender surgery is highly regulated in France based on the principle of "Indisponibilité du corps humain" https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indisponibilité_du_corps_humain
I can't find a link to confirm it at this moment but they said it comes from Napoleonic era law against men who cut off their balls to evade army incorporation.
 
I remember some French trans activists who explained that transgender surgery is highly regulated in France based on the principle of "Indisponibilité du corps humain" https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indisponibilité_du_corps_humain
I can't find a link to confirm it at this moment but they said it comes from Napoleonic era law against men who cut off their balls to evade army incorporation.

As far as I can understand the Wikipedia entry (My French is shit), transition surgery is sometimes seen as mutilation. It would be interesting to know if someone has been prosecuted based on this law in recent years. To me, it looks like a relic law that sits in law books, no one needs it and it should be deleted. But that would be too much work.
 
Which modern country fires people for being a tranny? That sounds like lawsuits out the ass time to me.

A country that would fire someone for being a tranny sounds like the kind of country that could also throw you off a building for being a tranny, and at that point I think you have bigger problems to worry about.
 


Sigh.
Not in YOUR country, you uneducated cow.

1)
canadianimmigration.net said:
Canadians no longer need to undergo gender-reassignment surgery in order to change their federal citizenship documents, according to a new reform by Citizenship and Immigration Canada.

in fact

Transgender rights in Canada said:
As of August 31, 2018, Canadians can indicate that they do not identify as male or female on their passports.

2)

https://wiki.clicklaw.bc.ca said:
As a result of the 2005 federal Civil Marriage Act, gender is irrelevant in determining the ability of a couple to marry.

You actually have additional transition rights if you're married. Especially if you're a minor.

Transgender rights in Canada said:
Legal change of gender is accessible to minors; this requires the parents' or guardians' consent, although this can be waived by court order or if the minor is emancipated, married, or a parent.

3)
canadian-senate-passes-transgender-bathroom-bill said:
Dubbed the “bathroom bill” by its many critics who say it provides legal protection to an undefined group, Bill C-16 provides sweeping “protection” for transgender Canadians from both discrimation and “hate crimes.”

As the definition of transgender is open to interpretation, the bill will allow men who choose to define their gender as female to use women’s changing rooms, which critics say could embolden sexual predators.

4)
canadaemploymenthumanrightslaw.com/ said:
While such protections have been reversing south of the border, protections and recognition of trans-rights in Canada continue to increase. In June 2017, the federal government passed Bill C-16, which added “gender identity or expression” to the Canadian Human Rights Act, and to the hate crimes and sentencing provisions of the Criminal Code. Notably, every province and territory already had these protections in their respective Human Rights legislation, so this move by the feds closes the loop. Indeed, the pioneering Northwest Territories has had gender expression protections in place since 2002

Transgender issues have no impact at all on the determination of child support. If you are a parent or qualify as a stepparent within the meaning of the applicable legislation, child support will be payable or receivable. End of story.

Canadian employers are expected to making workplaces safe for trans-people. Areas to consider include:
  • Ensuring the availability of a safe and comfortable washroom;
  • Removing barriers with respect to employer forms or IDs that collect information on sex, and have only gender binary options (M or F);
  • Reviewing content of background checks to ensure they do not “out” employees who have undergone a gender transition;
  • Reviewing uniforms or dress codes policies, although by now, employers are hopefully aware that any sex-based difference in dress code must be legitimately linked to the requirements of the job. If this cannot be shown (it’s unlikely it can), then the dress code is discriminatory anyway.
In all circumstances employers need to be sensitive to their employees safety, and take care to not discriminate against employees who identify as non-binary.

Christ, learn to speak for yourself, Labelle. Talk about your country or be specific with your ignorant dredge.
Remember how the intersex people told you to stop speaking for them?
Learn your friggin lesson and stop spreading your own filth as facts
 
Which modern country fires people for being a tranny? That sounds like lawsuits out the ass time to me.

A country that would fire someone for being a tranny sounds like the kind of country that could also throw you off a building for being a tranny, and at that point I think you have bigger problems to worry about.

While I wouldn't approve of someone being fired for being a tranny, I imagine many, many people have been fired for acting like most trannies act.
 
While I wouldn't approve of someone being fired for being a tranny, I imagine many, many people have been fired for acting like most trannies act.
The absolute hiring "discrimination" classic.

We didn't fire you because you're trans/black/disabled/etc. We fired you because you're a massive cunt.

It just so happens that massive cunts fall back on any minority status they might have as a shield.
 
"...Aren't allowed to transition," says what appears to be a 10-year-old Xirl of Color.

Why is it so hard for LaBelle to understand that yes, prepubescent children should not be allowed to make drastic life-altering decisions, and in fact, prepubescent children don't have the sexuality or the awareness to WANT a transitioning?
If you can't vote, enlist, marry, enter a legal contract on your own, etc. Then why would you be allowed to do serious changes to your body? We don't let kids get body art done without parental permission, this is kicking it up a notch by a lot.
 
And how do you transition without being sterilized?
Where's the fetus going to gestate? Are you going to carry it in a box?
Source, I want a source for this, and it should be a law that is still in action and not some shit that isn't even active anymore.
It's a deceptive rewording of "you have to get sex reassignment surgery to have your gender marker changed". If you can live without a piece of paper saying you're male/female then you can pop out as many babies as you want.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back